This study aims to highlight the theory-method relationship, as well as some problems strongly intertwined with the methodological. It is also intended to show how conceptualizations inspired by Piagetian and dynamic systems, for example, go hand in hand with methodologies that are close to them and from which they can be approached. Methodologically, a microgenetic approach is chosen in a singular version, which recovers the spirit conceived in the Geneva School from a cultural and idiographic perspective. Assuming development as change implies taking into account the temporality of the processes, for which we will rely on treatments, some already known (MIN-MAX) and others relatively new (Phase Spaces), which allow us to represent and understand in a more detailed way how change occurs in time, in this case, in the process of understanding the visual metaphor in children from 3 to 4 years of age.
ChaudharyN.SriramS. (2022). Musings about metaphors and models: The need to put psychology together again. Integr. Psych. Behav, 56(1), 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09575-8
7.
ColstonH. L. (2020). Figurative language development/acquisition research: Status and ways forward. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.002
8.
De la RosaA. (2010). Emergencia de la Comprensión de la Metáfora visual. Cali Colombia: Tesis de doctorado. Universidad del Valle.
9.
EcoU. (2009). Cultura y semiótica. Madrid: Círculo de Bellas Artes.
10.
FlynnE.SieglerR. (2007). Measuring change: Current trends and future directions in microgenetic research. Infant and Child Development, 16(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.502
11.
FossaP.CortésC.MolinaM. E.BarrosM.MarcottiC. M.SproveraI.NovoaJ. T. (2022). Microgenetic analysis of thought trajectories: A mixed design. Integr. Psych. Behav, 56(3), 630–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-021-09633-9
12.
GibbsR. W.JrColstonH. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press.
13.
GinzburgC. (1989). Indicios: Raíces de un paradigma de inferencias indiciales (pp. 138–175). Barcelona: IndiciosGedisa.
14.
GottliebG.WahlstenD.LickliterR. (1998). The significance of biology for human development: A developmental psychobiological systems view. In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 233–273). John Wiley & Sons.
15.
Groupeμ (1993). Tratado del signo visual. Ediciones Cátedra. Signo e imagen.
16.
HaynesS.BlaineD.MeyerK. (1995). Dynamical models for psychological assessment: Phase space functions. Psychological Assessment, 7(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.1.17
17.
InhelderB.CéllerierG. (1992). Les cheminements de découvert de l´enfant Recherches sur la microgenèse cognitives. Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé (Suiza).
18.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. The MIT Press.
19.
KullaseppK.MarsicoG. (2021). Identity at the borders and between the borders. Springer.
20.
MarkmanE.WasowJ.HansenM. (2003). Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners. Cognitive Psychology, 47(3), 241–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00034-3
21.
MarsicoG. (2011). The “non-cuttable” space in between: Context, boundaries and their natural fluidity. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9164-9
22.
MarsicoG. (2013). Moving between the social spaces: Conditions for boundaries crossing. In MarsicoG.KomatsuK.IannacconeA. (Eds), Crossing boundaries. Intercontextual dynamics between family and school (pp. 361–374). Information Age Publishing.
23.
MillerP.CoyleT. (1999). Developmental change: Lessons from microgenesis. In ScholnickE.NelsonK.Gelman yMillarS.P. H. (Eds), Conceptual development: Paget's legacy (pp. 209–239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
MolenaarP .C. MLernerR. M.NewellK.M.EnP.C.MMolenaarR. M.LernerNewellK. M. (2014). Developmental systems theory and methodologyHandbook developmental systems theory & methodology (pp. 3–18). Guilford Press.
25.
MounoudP. (2000). Le développement cognitif selon piaget. Structures et point de vue. En: O. Houdé, y C. Meljac (comps). Presses Universitaires de France.
26.
OssaJ. C.CudinaJ. N. (2023). Farewell to variables in studies of developmental psychology. Notes on a critical and conceptual debate. In J. Valsiner (Ed), Farewell to variables (pp. 75–110). Information Age Publishing.
Puche-NavarroR. (2001). Mutaciones, metáforas y humor visual en el niño. In RosasR. (Ed), La mente reconsiderada. En homenaje a Angel Rivière (pp. 181–202). Santiago, Chile: Psykhe.
29.
Puche-NavarroR. (2003). El niño que piensa y vuelve a pensar. Colombia: Artes Gráficas del Valle Editores.
30.
Puche-NavarroR. (2009). ¿Es La mente no lineal?Colombia: Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle.
31.
Puche-NavarroR. (2012). Modeling iconic literacy: The dynamic models for complex cultural objects. In ValsinerJ. (Ed), The oxford handbook of culture psychology (pp. 303–315). Oxford University Press.
32.
Puche-NavarroR. (2017). Estudios de desarrollo cognitivo: Antes y después del encuentro con los sistemas dinámicos. (Eds), El desarrollo cognitivo se reorganiza. Emergencia, Cambio autorregulación y metáforas visuales. (pp. 11–31). California Edit.
33.
Puche-NavarroR. (2022). En busca del método microgenético (Sometido a publicación).
34.
Puche-NavarroR.Cerchiaro-CeballosE.De la RosaA.MontesJ. A.OssaJ. C. (2017a). El desarrollo cognitivo se reorganiza. Emergencia, Cambio autorregulación y metáforas visuales. Editorial Bonaventuriana. Programa editorial UAO. California Edit.
35.
Puche-NavarroR.Cerchiaro-CeballosE.OssaJ. C. (2017b). Emergencia del cambio: Dos casos ilustrativos desde los sistemas dinámicos no linealesEl desarrollo cognitivo se reorganiza. Emergencia, cambio autorregulación y metáforas visualesEditorial bonaventuriana. Programa editorial UAO (pp. 35–62). California Edit.
36.
Puche-NavarroR.OssaJ. C. (2006). ¿Qué hay de nuevo en el método microgenético? Más allá de las estrategias y más acá del funcionamiento cognitivo del sujeto. Summa Psicológica, 13(2), 117–137.
37.
Puche-NavarroR.OssaJ. C.Cerchiaro-CeballosE. (2020). Más allá de la redescripción y más cerca de la emergencia: El caso del descubrimiento de mecanismos en dispositivos en niños pequeños. En: R. Puche-navarro (Comp.). La certeza de la emergencia. Reflexiones sobre una ciencia del desarrollo (pp. 75–121). Editorial Bonaventuriana. California-Edit.
38.
RicoeurP. (1980). La metáfora viva. Trad. por Agustín Neira. Madrid: Ediciones Europa.
39.
SalvatoreS.ValsinerJ. (2010). Idiographic opposition between the general and the unique : Overcoming the nomothetic versus 20: 817. Theory Psychology Aprendizaje, 27(2), 147–155.
40.
SieglerR. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In DamonW.LernerR. M.SeriesKuhnD.SieglerR. S. (Eds), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed. pp. 464–510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
UrbanJ. B.OsgoodN.OkamotoJ.MabryP.LichK. H.EnP. C. MMolenaarR. M.LernerNewellK. M. (2014). Developmental systems science: Extending developmental science with systems science methodologies. In Handbook developmental systems theory & methodology (pp. 95–125). Guilford Press.
44.
ValsinerJ. (1999). I create you to control me: A glimpse into basic processes of semiotic mediation. Human Development, 42(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000022606
ValsinerJ. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.
47.
ValsinerJ. (2017). From Methodology to Methods in human psychology. Springer.
48.
VelicerW. F.BabbinS. F.PalumboB. (2014). Idiographic applications: Issues of ergodicity and generalizability. In MolenaarP.LernerR.NewellK. (Eds), Handbook of relational developmental systems theory and methodology (pp. 425–441). New York: Guilford Publications.
49.
WitheringtonD. C.BoomJ. (2019). Conceptualizing the dynamics of development in the 21st century: Process, (inter) action, and complexity. Human Development, 63(63), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1159/000504097
50.
ZagariaA.AndoA.ZennaroA. (2020). Psychology: A giant with feet of clay. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(3), 521–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09524-5
51.
ZgonnikovA.LubashevskyI. (2014). Extended phase space description of human-controlled systems dynamics. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2014(3), 033J02. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptu034
52.
ZittounT. (2021). Thinking with the rain. The trajectory of a metaphor in vygotsky’s theoretical development. Integr. Psych. Behav, 55(4), 749–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-021-09646-4
FischerK. W.BidellT. R. (2006). Dynamic development of action, thought, and emotion. In LernerR. M.DamonW. (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: (6th ed.). Wiley.
