Manifestations of wisdom in ancient China: An analysis of the Zhinang Quanji

Abstract

This study aims to use summarizing content analysis and descriptive analysis to examine features related to wisdom in Zhinang Quanji, a collection of classical Chinese wisdom stories by 17th-century writer Feng Menglong, so as to investigate the real-life manifestations of wisdom of ancient Chinese. The results are as follows: (1) the wisdom of ancient Chinese is mainly manifested in 20 different kinds of events. Among these, the following are the five instances of wisdom that appear most frequently: (a) act resourcefully and calmly as the situation demands to deal with emergencies; (b) assist those in a higher position (especially through admonishment or remonstration); (c) take note of even the finest detail and wisely settle disputes; (d) when in bureaucratic circles, clearly analyze the situation and plan far ahead; and (e) on the battlefield, ascertain the mentality of the enemy force, take them by surprise, and overcome them. (2) A total of 932 wise characters are included in Zhinang Quanji. Here, several characteristics are commonly found, including dominant maleness, numerical minority of persons aged under 18 and above 60, and predominance of characters who possess human wisdom. The current findings can provide a useful framework for understanding the manifestation of wisdom in concrete life contexts, thus helping us to better understand and grasp the meaning and nature of wisdom.

Keywords

wisdom ancient Chinese wisdom manifestation of wisdom summarizing content analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aczel

Palfi

Kekecs

(2015). What is stupid? People’s conception of unintelligent behavior. Intelligence, 53, 51–58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.010

Ardelt

(2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25(3), 275–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027503025003004

Ardelt

(2009). How similar are wise men and women? A comparison across two age cohorts. Research in Human Development, 6(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902779354

Baltes

P. B.

Staudinger

U. M.

(2000). Wisdom. A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.122

Bangen

K. J.

Meeks

T. W.

Jeste

D. V.

(2013). Defining and assessing wisdom: A review of the literature. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(12), 1254–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.020

Edmondson

Woerner

M. H.

(2019). Sociocultural foundations of wisdom. In Sternberg

R. J.

Glück

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 40–68). Cambridge University Press.

Fang

H. X.

(2012). The art of compilation of Zhinang. Seeker, (5), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.16059/j.cnki.cn43-1008/c.2012.05.011.

Feng

M. L.

(2007). Zhinang Quanji. Chinese Book Bureau.

C. Z.

(2012). The compilation and criticize of Zhinang. Jiangsu Social Sciences, (4), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-8671.2012.04.029.

10.

Glück

Strasser

Bluck

(2009). Gender differences in implicit theories of wisdom. Research in Human Development, 6(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902779370

11.

Grossmann

(2017). Wisdom in context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616672066

12.

Grossmann

Kross

(2014). Exploring Solomon’s paradox: Self-distancing eliminates the self-other asymmetry in wise reasoning about close relationships in younger and older adults. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1571–1580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535400

13.

Grossmann

Varnum

M. E.

Park

D. C.

Kitayama

Nisbett

R. E.

(2010). Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(16), 7246–7250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001715107

14.

Grossmann

Weststrate

Ardelt

Brienza

Dong

Ferrari

Fournier

C. S.

Nusbaum

Vervaeke

(2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917

15.

Hooge

I. E. D.

Verlegh

P. W. J.

Tzioti

S. C.

(2013). Emotions in advice taking: The roles of agency and valence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1801

16.

Jang

J. Y.

Feng

(2017). The effects of gain- and loss- framed advice messages on recipients’ responses to advice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17706961

17.

Jeste

D. V.

Lee

E. E.

(2019). The emerging empirical science of wisdom: Definition, measurement, neurobiology, longevity, and interventions. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 27(3), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000205

18.

Johnson

H. H.

Johnson

M. D.

(2017). Influence of event characteristics on assessing credibility and advice-taking. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(1), 89–103. http://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2016-0146

19.

Kagan

(2009). The three cultures: Natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press.

20.

Kahn

A. R.

(2005). A way to wisdom: The next step. Revision, 28(1), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.3200/revn.28.1.42-4

21.

Lee

P. C.

(2012). Li Zhi, confucianism and the virtue of desire. State University of New York Press.

22.

H. Q.

Wang

F. Y.

(2019). Real-time measurement of wise personality cognition: Evidence from mouse tracking. Current Psychology, 38(6), 1748–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9732-3

23.

J. G.

Jin

English

A. S.

(2021). Collectivism predicts mask use during COVID-19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(23), e2021793118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021793118

24.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557

25.

Maslow

B. G.

(1971). The farther reaches of human nature. The Viking Press.

26.

Mayring

(2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.

27.

Mickler

Staudinger

U. M.

(2008). Personal wisdom: Validation and age-related differences of a performance measure. Psychology & Aging, 23(4), 787. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013928

28.

Plaks

(2003). The ambivalence of creation: Debates concerning innovation and artifice in early China. Common Knowledge, 9(1), 164–165. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-9-1-164-a

29.

Rader

C. A.

Larrick

R. P.

Soll

J. B.

(2017). Advice as a form of social influence: Informational motives and the consequences for accuracy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(8), e12329. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12329

30.

Shields

G. S.

Sazma

M. A.

Yonelinas

A. P.

(2016). The effects of acute stress on core executive functions: A meta-analysis and comparison with cortisol. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 68, 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.038

31.

Sima

(2011). Shiji [Records of the grand historian]. Chinese Book Bureau.

32.

Sima

(2013). Zizhi Tongjian [Comprehensive mirror to aid in government]. Chinese Book Bureau.

33.

Staudinger

U. M.

Glück

(2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131659

34.

Stephens

D. J.

(2017). Realism and conventionalism in later Mohist semantics. Dao, 16(4), 521–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-017-9575-5

35.

Sternberg

R. J.

(1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.4.347

36.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2003). WICS as a model of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 109-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813032000163807

37.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2004). Why smart people can be so foolish. European Psychologist, 9(3), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.9.3.145

38.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2018). Wisdom, foolishness, and toxicity in human development. Research in Human Development, 15(3-4), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2018.1491216.

39.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2019a). Four ways to conceive of wisdom: Wisdom as a function of person, situation, person/situation interaction, or action. Journal of Value Inquiry, 53(3), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-019-09708-2.

40.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2019b). Why people often prefer wise guys to guys who are wise: An augmented balance theory of the production and reception of wisdom. In Sternberg

R. J.

Glück

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 162–181). Cambridge University Press.

41.

Thomas

M. L.

Bangen

K. J.

Ardelt

Jeste

D. V.

(2015). Development of a 12-item abbreviated three-dimensional wisdom scale (3d-ws-12): Item selection and psychometric properties. Assessment, 24(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115595714

42.

Thomas

M. L.

Bangen

K. J.

Palmer

B. W.

Sirkin

Avanzino

J. A.

Depp

C. A.

Glorioso

Daly

R. E.

Jeste

D. V.

(2019). A new scale for assessing wisdom based on common domains and a neurobiological model: The San Diego wisdom scale (SD-wise). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 108, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.09.005

43.

Tuo Tuo . (1977). Songshi [The history of Song dynasty]. Chinese Book Bureau.

44.

Tzini

Jain

(2018). The role of anticipated regret in advice taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2048

45.

Tzioti

S. C.

Wierenga

van Osselaer

S. M. J.

(2014). The effect of intuitive advice justification on advice taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1790

46.

Wang

Y. L.

Wang

F. Y.

(2018). Older and wiser? The relationship between wisdom and age among adults. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00107

47.

Wang

S. Y.

Wong

Y. J.

Yeh

K. H.

Wang

(2018). What makes a meaningful life? Examining the effects of interpersonal harmony, dialectical coping, and nonattachment. Asian Journal of Psychology, 21(3), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12212

48.

Wang

F. Y.

Zheng

(2014). Theoretical exploration and applied researches of wisdom psychology. Shanghai Education Publishing House.

49.

Webster

J. D.

(2003). An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Journal of Adult Development, 10(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020782619051

50.

Webster

J. D.

(2010). Wisdom and positive psychosocial values in young adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 17(2), 70–80.

51.

Webster

J. D.

Westerhof

G. J.

Bohlmeijer

E. T.

(2014). Wisdom and mental health across the lifespan. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs121

52.

Weststrate

N. M.

Ferrari

Ardelt

(2016). The many faces of wisdom: An investigation of cultural-historical wisdom exemplars reveals practical, philosophical, and benevolent prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216638075

53.

Weststrate

N. M.

Glück

(2017). Hard-earned wisdom: Exploratory processing of difficult life experience is positively associated with wisdom. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 800–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000286

54.

Yang

S. Y.

(2008). A process view of wisdom. Journal of Adult Development, 15(2), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-008-9037-8

55.

Yang

S. Y.

(2016). Exploring wisdom in the Confucian tradition: Wisdom as manifested by Fan Zhongyan. New Ideas in Psychology, 41, 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.11.001

56.

Zhou

Kim

Rui

(2019). Chivalrous idealist and pragmatic strategist: The influence of Mohist values on Ma Yun’s leadership in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 25(2), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2018.1548546