The enactment of the Water Services Bill into Irish law on December 28, 2014, was met with strong opposition from the Irish public, manifesting in local and national demonstrations. This social movement provided an ideal case to examine interactions between protesters and police in different contexts. Ethnographic observations and randomly sampled interviews took place before, and during, seven national demonstrations in Dublin, Ireland. Simultaneously, urban ethnographic research yielded in-depth observational and interview data at local protests in another Irish city. Data from both national and local protests are examined in light of classical and contemporary sociocultural psychological conceptualizations of the crowd. The elaborated social identity model offers most explanatory power to comprehend the observed and reported events between police and protesters in this cultural context during an unprecedented economic recovery following recession. No evidence is found to support classical conceptualizations of the crowd. I describe the consequences of this analysis for conceptualizing police–protester interactions to generate peaceful assembly in liberal democracies.
AllportF. (1924). Social psychology. Houghton Mifflin.
2.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
3.
CanettiE. (1984). Crowds and power. Macmillan.
4.
CornishF. (2012). Collectives may protest: But how do authorities respond. In Culture and social change: Transforming society through the power of ideas (pp. 30–52). Information Age Publishing.
5.
DavidaiS. (2018). Why do Americans believe in economic mobility? economic inequality, external attributions of wealth and poverty, and the belief in economic mobility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 138-148.
6.
DavisN. Z. (1978). The rites of violence: Religious riot in sixteenth century France. Past and Present, 59, 51-91.
7.
DenzinN. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88.
8.
DienerE. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In PaulusP. B (Ed.), Psychology of group influence. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum, 209-242.
9.
DruryJ. (2020). Recent developments in the psychology of crowds and collective behaviour. Current Opinion in Psychology. 35, 12-16.
10.
DavidaiS.GilovichT. (2015). Building a more mobile America-one income quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 60-71.
11.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 579-604.
12.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35-58.
13.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 707-725.
14.
DurrheimK.FosterD. (1999). Technologies of social control: Crowd management in liberal democracy. Economy and Society, 28(1), 56-74.
15.
DruryJ.ReicherS. D (2018). The conservative crowd? How participation in collective events transforms participants’ understandings of collective action. The Psychology of Radical Social Change: From Rage to Revolution, 11–28.
16.
DruryJ.ReicherS.StottC. (2003). Transforming the boundaries of collective identity: from the ‘local’ anti-road campaign to ‘global’ resistance?. Social Movement Studies, 2(2), 191-212.
17.
FrankR. (2013). Falling behind: how rising inequality harms the middle class (Vol. 4), University of California Press.
18.
FreudS. (1940). The theory of the instincts. An outline of psychoanalysis, The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, 23, 148-151.
19.
FestingerL.PepitoneA.NewcombT. (1952). Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382-389.
20.
GeertzC. (1973). Interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
21.
HagertyS.NortonM. (2018). Perceptions of inequality shape preferences for redistribution. Current Anthropology, 59(6), 779.
22.
HammackP. L. (2011). Narrative and the politics of identity: The cultural psychology of Israeli and Palestinian youth. Oxford University Press.
23.
HochschildA. R. (2018). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. The New Press.
24.
Le BonG. (1903). The crowd: A study of the popular mind (4th imprinting). T. Fisher Unwin. (Originally published: Psychologie des foules.1895.
25.
LewinK. (2014). Psychological ecology (1943). In The people, place, and space reader (1st ed.). Routledge. 51-55.
26.
MoghaddamF. M. (2018). Mutual radicalization: How groups and nations drive each other to extremes. American Psychological Association.
27.
MoscoviciS. (1986). The discovery of the masses. In Changing conceptions of crowd mind and behavior (pp. 5-25), Springer.
28.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
29.
PowerS. A. (2015). To understand the Eurozone crisis, consider culture. Chicago Booth Review, 63–65.
30.
PowerS. A. (2016). A violent past but a peaceful present: The cultural psychology of an Irish recession. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22(1), 60-66.
31.
PowerS. A. (2017). From the elites to the streets: The psychology of democracy and economic inequality. University of Chicago.
32.
PowerS. A. (2018a). The deprivation-protest paradox: how the perception of unfair economic inequality leads to civic unrest. Current Anthropology59(6), 765–789.
33.
PowerS. A. (2018b). Economic inequality and the rise of civic discontent: Remembering and deprivation in the Republic of Ireland. In WagonerBMoghaddamFValsinerJ (Eds.), The psychology of radical social change: from rage to revolution (pp. 29-53), Cambridge University Press.
34.
PowerS. A. (2018c). Remembering and imagining in human development: Fairness and social movements in Ireland. In de Saint-LaurentCObradovicSCarriereK (Eds.). Imagining collective futures: perspectives from social, cultural and political psychology (pp. 221-235), Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
PowerS. A. (2018d). Actual democracy and a United Europe of States: A case study of austerity and protest in the Republic of Ireland. In WagonerBBrescóIGlaveanuV (Eds.), The road to actualized democracy: a psychological perspective (pp. 147–164). Information Age Publishing.
36.
PowerS. A. (2020). Why a richer world will have more civic discontent: The infinity theory of social movements. Review of General Psychology, 24(2), 118-133.
37.
PowerS. A.NussbaumD. (2014). The fightin’ Irish? Not when it comes to recession and austerity. The Guardian.
38.
PowerS. A.NussbaumD. (2016). ‘You reap what you sow:’ the psychology of the Irish austerity protests. The Guardian.
39.
PowerS. A.VelezG. (2020). The MOVE framework: Meanings, observations, viewpoints, and experiences in processes of social change. Review of General Psychology, 24(4), 321-334. doi:10.1177/1089268020915841
40.
PowerS. A.VelezG.QadafiA.TennantJ. (2018). The SAGE model of social psychological research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(3), 359-372.
41.
Prentice-DunnS.RogersR. W. (1989). Deindividuation and the self-regulation of behaviorLawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42.
ReddyW. M. (1977). The textile trade and the language of the crowd at Rouen 1752-1871. Past and Present, 74, 62-89.
43.
ReicherS. D. (1984). The St. Pauls riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1-21.
44.
ReicherS. D. (1987). Crowd behaviour as social action. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, 10, 89-104.
45.
ReicherS. D. (1996). 'The battle of westminster': Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 115-134.
46.
ReicherS. (2017). “La beauté est dans la rue”: Four reasons (or perhaps five) to study crowds. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 593-605.
47.
ReicherS.PotterJ. (1985). Psychological theory as intergroup perspective: A comparative analysis of “scientific” and “lay” accounts of crowd events. Human Relations, 38(2), 167-189.
48.
ReicherS. D.StottC. (2011). Mad mobs and English men? Myths and realities of the 2011 riots. Constable & Robinson.
49.
ReicherS.StottC.CroninP.AdangO. (2004). An integrated approach to crowd psychology and public order policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 27(4), 558-572.
50.
ReicherS.StottC.DruryJ.AdangO.CroninP.LivingstoneA. (2007). Knowledge-based public order policing: principles and practice. Policing, 1(4), 403-415.
51.
ShwederR. A (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Harvard University Press.
52.
ShwederR. A. (1996). Quanta and qualia: What is the “object” of ethnographic method?. In JessorR.ColbyA.ShwederR. A. (Eds) Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 175-182). University of Chicago Press.
53.
ShwederR. A. (1997). The surprise of ethnography. Ethos, 25(2), 152-163.
54.
ShwederR. A. (2003). Why do men barbecue?: Recipes for cultural psychology. Harvard University Press.
55.
ShwederR. A. (2008). After just schools: Conflicting varieties of liberal hope. In MinnowM.ShwederR.A.MarkusH. (Eds.), Just schools: pursuing equality in societies of difference. Russell Sage Foundation Press.
56.
ShwederR. A. (2010). Donald Campbell’s doubt: Cultural difference or failure of communication?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 109.
57.
StottC.HutchisonP.DruryJ. (2001). 'Hooligans' abroad? Inter-group dynamics, social identity and participation in collective 'disorder' at the 1998 world cup finals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 359-384.
58.
StottC.RadburnM. (2020). Understanding crowd conflict: Social context, psychology and policing. Current opinion in psychology, 75, 76-80.
59.
StottC.ReicherS. (1998a). Crowd action as intergroup process: Introducing the police perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 509-529.
60.
StottC.ReicherS. (1998b). How conflict escalates: The inter-group dynamics of collective football crowd `violence'. Sociology, 32(2), 353-377.
61.
StottC.ReicherS. (2011). Mad mobs and Englishmen?: Myths and realities of the 2011 riots. UK: Hachette.
62.
TajfelH. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
63.
ThompsonE. P. (1971). The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past and Present, 50, 76-136.
64.
TylerT. (2011). Procedural justice shapes evaluations of income inequality: Commentary on norton and ariely (2011). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 15-16.
65.
Van GinnekenJ. (1992). Crowds, psychology, and politics, 1871-1899. Cambridge University Press.
66.
WagonerB.MoghaddamF. M.ValsinerJ. (Eds.). (2018). The psychology of radical social change: From rage to revolution. Cambridge University Press.
67.
WarrenZ. J.PowerS. A. (2015). It's contagious: Rethinking a metaphor dialogically. Culture & Psychology, 21(3), 359-379.
68.
ZimbardoP. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska press.
