We focus on the notion of borders to explore how mobility and immobility in the city affect the relationship between human development and urban culture. We define borders as a relational space made of territoriality, representations and different possibilities of mobility and immobility. Drawing on research in the favelas of Rio de Janeiro, we suggest a systematic approach to the analysis of borders and identify the socio-institutional, spatial and symbolic elements that make them more or less porous and thus more or less amenable to human mobility. We highlight the association between porosity in city borders and human development and illustrate the model contrasting two favela communities in Rio de Janeiro. We show that participation in the socio-cultural environment by favela grassroots organisations increases the porosity of internal city borders and contributes to the development of self, communities and the city. To focus on borders, their different elements and levels of porosity means to address simultaneously the psychosocial and cultural layers of urban spaces and the novel ways through which grassroots social actors develop themselves through participation and semiotic reconstruction of the socio-cultural environment.
Alpar AtunR.DoratliN. (2009).
Walls in cities: A conceptual approach to the walls of Nicosia. Geopolitics,
14, 108–134.
2.
AtkinsonR.KintreaK. (2004).
Opportunities and despair, it’s all in there’: Practitioner experiences and explanations of area effects and life chances. Sociology,
38, 437–455.
3.
Buck‐MorssS. (1986).
The flaneur, the sandwichman and the whore: The politics of loitering. New German Critique,
39, 99–140.
4.
BurdettR. (2013).
Designing urban democracy: Mapping scales of urban identity. Public Culture,
25, 349–367.
5.
CaldeiraT. P. (1996).
Building up walls: The new pattern of spatial segregation in Sao Paulo. International Social Science Journal,
48, 55–66.
6.
CaldeiraT. P. R. (2000). City of walls: Crime, segregation, and citizenship in Sao Paulo.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
7.
CaldeiraT. P. R. (2012).
Inscrição e circulação: Novas visibilidades e configurações do espaço público em São Paulo. Novos Estudos,
94, 31–67.
8.
CaldeiraT. P. R. (2014).
Qual a novidade dos rolezinhos? Espaço público, desigualdade e mudança em São Paulo. Novos Estudos,
98, 13–20.
9.
CorbozJ. (2013).
Asentamientos and categriles: New poverty and the moral dangers of proximity in Uruguayan squatter settlements. Latin American Research Review,
3, 44–62.
10.
CrawfordM. (1992). The world in a shopping mall. In SorkinM. (Ed.), Variations on a theme park (pp. 3–30).
New York, NY:
Noonday Press.
11.
De CerteauM. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Trans. Steven F. Rendail.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
12.
De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2016). Possible use in psychology of threshold concept in order to study sensemaking processes. Culture and Psychology, 22(3), 362--375.
13.
De Luca PicioneR.ValsinerJ. (2017).
Psychological functions of semiotic borders in sensemaking: Liminality of narrative processes. Europe’s Journal of Psychology,
13, 532–547.
14.
Dedios SanguinetiM. C. (2019). Exploring the role of the youth group in adolescent development under contextual adversity: A comparative study of adolescents belonging to peacebuilding groups and gangs in Colombia. PhD thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
15.
DixonJ.DurrheimK. (2000).
Displacing place-identity: A discursive approach to locating self and other. British Journal of Social Psychology,
39, 27–44.
16.
EspañolA.MarsicoG.TateoL. (2018).
Maintaining borders: From border guards to diplomats. Human Affairs,
28, 443–460.
17.
ForsbergS. (2019).
The right to immobility’ and the uneven distribution of spatial capital: Negotiating youth transitions in northern Sweden. Social & Cultural Geography,
20, 323–343.
HallS.SavageM. (2016).
Animating the urban vortex: New sociological urgencies. International Journal of Regional and Urban Research,
40, 82–95.
20.
HarveyD. (2013). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution.
London, UK and New York, NY:
Verso Books.
21.
HedegaardM. (2014).
Exploring tension and contradictions in youth activity of painting graffiti. Culture & Psychology,
20, 387–403.
22.
HolstonJ. (2009).
Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries. City & Society,
21, 245–267.
23.
IyerA.ZhangA.JettenJ.ZhenH.CuiL. (2017).
The promise of a better group future: Cognitive alternatives increase students’ self-efficacy and academic performance. British Journal of Social Psychology,
56, 750–765.
24.
JamilU. (2015).
Making place: Muslims in the neighbourhood. Contemporary Islam,
9, 321–335.
25.
JettenJ.IyerA.BranscombeN. R.ZhangA. (2013).
How the disadvantaged appraise group-based exclusion: The path from legitimacy to illegitimacy. European Review of Social Psychology,
24, 194–224.
26.
JovchelovitchS.Priego-HernándezJ. (2013). Underground sociabilities: Identity, culture and resistance in the favelas of Rio de Janeiro.
Brasilia, Brazil:
UNESCO.
27.
JovchelovitchS.Priego-HernándezJ. (2015/2016). Bottom-up social development in favelas of Rio de Janeiro: A toolkit.
London, UK:
LSE Academic Publishing.
28.
JovchelovitchS.Priego-HernándezJ.GlâveanuV. (2017). Imagination in children entering culture. In ZittounT.GlâveanuV. P., Handbook of imagination and culture (pp. 111–136).
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
29.
KatoY. (2011).
Coming of age in the bubble: Suburban adolescents’ use of a spatial metaphor as a symbolic boundary. Symbolic Interaction,
34, 244–264.
30.
KintreaK.BannisterJ.PickeringJ. (2010).
Territoriality and disadvantage among young people: An exploratory study of six British neighbourhoods. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,
25, 447–465.
31.
LamontM.MizrachiN. (2012). Ordinary people doing extraordinary things: Responses to stigmatization in comparative perspective. In LamontM.MizrachiN. (Eds.), Responses to stigmatization in comparative perspective (pp. 13–29).
London, UK:
Routledge.
32.
LamontM.MolnárV. (2002).
The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology,
28, 167–195.
33.
LefebvreH. (2014). The urban revolution.
Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
34.
LewickaM. (2008).
Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past. Journal of Environmental Psychology,
28, 209–231.
35.
LynchK. (1960). The image of the city.
Cambridge, MA:
The M.I.T. Press.
36.
MárquezF. (2011).
Santiago: Modernisation, segregation and urban identities in the twenty-first century. Urbani Izziv,
22, 86–97.
37.
MarsicoG. (2016).
The borderland. Culture & Psychology,
22, 206–215.
38.
MarsicoG.TateoL. (2017).
Borders, tensegrity and development in dialogue. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Sciences,
51, 536–556.
39.
MasseyD. (2008). A global sense of place. In OakesT. S.PriceP. L. (Eds.), The cultural geography reader (pp. 269–275).
London, UK:
Routledge.
40.
MilgramS. (1984). Cities as social representations. In FarrM.MoscoviciS. (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 285–309).
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
41.
NagleJ. (2013).
Unity in diversity’: Non-sectarian social movement challenges to the politics of ethnic antagonism in violently divided cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,
37, 78–92.
42.
NagleJ. (2009).
Sites of social centrality and segregation: Lefebvre in Belfast, a ‘Divided City’. Antipode,
41, 326–347.
43.
NAS (2018). Addressing the social and cultural norms that underlie the acceptance of violence. Proceedings of a workshop in brief.
Washington, DC:
The National Academies of Sciences. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17226/25075
44.
NeofotistosV. P. (2004).
Beyond stereotypes: Violence and the porousness of ethnic boundaries in the Republic of Macedonia. History and Anthropology,
15, 1–36.
45.
PaasiA. (2013). Borders and border crossings. In N. Johnson, R. Schein, & J. Winders (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Cultural Geography (pp. 478--493). London: Wiley-Blackwell.
46.
PearceJ. (2007). Violence, power and participation: Building citizenship in contexts of chronic violence. Institute for Development Studies, Working paper 274, 66. Retrieved from http://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/12080
47.
PelapratE.ColeM. (2011). “
Minding the gap”: Imagination, creativity and human cognition. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,
45, 397–418.
48.
PierceJ.MartinD. G.MurphyJ. T. (2011).
Relational place-making: The networked politics of place. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,
36, 54–70.
49.
RamosS. (2006).
Brazilian responses to violence and new forms of mediation: The case of the Grupo Cultural AfroReggae and the experience of the project “Youth and the Police”. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva,
11, 419–428.
50.
RamosS. (2007). Jovens de Favelas na Produção Cultural Brasileira dos anos 90. In Mendes de AlmeidaM. I.Cambraia NavesS. (Eds.), Por que não? Rupturas e Continuidades da Contracultura (pp. 239–256).
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil:
7Letras.
51.
RasseA. (2015).
Juntos Pero No Revueltos: Procesos de Integración Social En Fronteras Residenciales Entre Hogares de Distinto Nivel Socioeconómico. EURE (Santiago),
41, 125–143.
52.
RisticM. (2015).
Intangible borders: Everyday spatialities of ethnic division in postwar sarajevo. Fabrications,
25, 322–343.
53.
RolnikS. (1989). Cartografia Sentimental. Transformações Contemporâneas do Desejo.
Sao Paulo, Brazil:
Editora Estação Liberdade.
54.
SibleyD. (1988).
Purification of space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,
6, 409–421.
55.
SibleyD. (1995). Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the West.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
56.
SennetR. (2010). The public realm. In BridgeG.WatsonS. (Eds.), The Blackwell City reader (pp. 261–272).
Chichester, UK:
Wiley-Blackwell.
57.
SennettR. (2011). Boundaries and borders. In BurdettR.SudjicD. (Eds.), Living the endless city (pp. 324–331).
London, UK and New York, NY:
Phaidon.
58.
Simmel, G. (1948). Social Sciences III, Selections and Selected Readings, Vol. 2, translated by Edward Shils. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
59.
StrüverA. (2004).
Boundaries under construction: Linking body politics to space. Espace Populations Societes,
1, 121–130.
60.
TateoL.MarsicoG. (2019).
Along the border: Affective promotion or inhibition of conduct in urban spaces/A lo largo de la frontera: Promoción o inhibición afectiva de la conducta en los espacios urbanos. Estudios de Psicología,
40, 245–281.
61.
ThiemeS.GhimireA. (2014).
Making migrants visible in post-MDG debates. Sustainability,
6, 399–415.
62.
TonkissF. (2014). Cities by design: The social life of urban form.
London, UK:
John Wiley & Sons.
63.
ToolisE. E.HammackP. L. (2015). “
This is My Community”: Reproducing and resisting boundaries of exclusion in contested public spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology,
56, 368–382.
64.
ValsinerJ. (2000). Culture and human development.
London, UK:
Sage.
65.
Vygotsky, L. (1994). Imagination and creativity of the adolescent. In R. Van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky Reader (pp. 266--288). Oxford: Blackwell.
66.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
67.
WacquantL. (2013). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality.
Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons.
68.
WacquantL.SlaterT.PereiraV. B. (2014).
Territorial stigmatization in action. Environment and Planning A,
46, 1270–1280.
69.
WatzlawikM. (2014).
The ‘art’ of identity development—Graffiti painters moving through time and space. Culture & Psychology,
20, 404–415.
70.
YúdiceG. (2001).
Afro Reggae: Parlaying culture into social justice. Social Text,
19, 53–65.
71.
ZittounT. (2016).
A sociocultural psychology of the life-course. Social Psychological Review,
18, 6–17.
72.
ZittounT.GillespieA. (2015). Integrating experiences: Body and mind moving between contexts. In WagonerB.ChaudharyN.HviidP. (Eds.), Integrating experiences: Body and mind moving between contexts. Niels Bohr lectures in cultural psychology. (pp. 3–49)
Vol 2.
Charlotte, NC:
Information Age Publishing.
73.
ZittounT.GillespieA. (2016). Imagination in human and cultural development.
London, UK:
Routledge.
74.
ZittounT.GlâveanuV. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of imagination and culture.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
