The loss of home as a consequence of war, conflict and displacement urges us to question the concept’s very construction. Although existing spatial and cultural studies on the subject have explored the immaterial characteristics of the construct, they have overlooked its connection to the consciousness and agency of the displaced, which are quintessentially contingent. This article presents a theoretical inquiry into the influence of the processual ambiguity of our cognitive system on the positioning of the concept of home between the temporality of its construct and the plasticity of its agency. Using connections between cognitive plasticity (based on Catherine Malabou’s concept of the freedom of the brain) and spatial plasticity (influenced by Vilém Flusser’s notion of the freedom of the migrant and the construction of the concepts of home), it establishes that the plasticity of migrants’ agency in displacement is an instrumental process in encoding new spatial practices of home-making.
BanduraA. (1999).
Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology,
52(1), 21–41.
8.
BluntA. (2003).
Collective memory and productive Nostalgia: Anglo-Indian homemaking at McCluskieganj. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,
21(6), 717–738.
BoccagniP. (2017). Migration and the search for home: Mapping domestic space in migrants’ everyday life. Mobility and politics series.
New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
BrahA. (1996). Cartographies of diaspora: Contesting identities.
London, UK:
Routledge.
12.
BrennerN.SchmidC. (2015).
Towards a new epistemology of the urban?City,
19(2–3), 151–182.
13.
BrickellK. (2012).
Geopolitics of home. Geography Compass,
6(10), 575–588.
14.
BrunC.FabosA. (2015).
Making homes in limbo? A conceptual framework. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees,
31(1), 5–18.
15.
DasV. (2007). Life and words.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
16.
FlusserV. (2003). The freedom of the migrant: Objections to nationalism.
Oxford, UK:
Marston Book Services.
17.
FlusserV. (2005).
The city as wave‐trough in the image‐flood. Critical Inquiry,
31(2), 320–328.
18.
GiddensA. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
19.
GoodmanN. (1978). Ways of worldmaking.
Indianapolis, IN:
Hackett Publishing.
20.
GreenwoodP. M.ParasuramanR. (2010).
Neuronal and cognitive plasticity: A neurocognitive framework for ameliorating cognitive aging. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience,
2, 150. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2999838/
21.
GuptaA.FergusonJ. (1992).
Beyond “culture”: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology,
7(1), 6–23.
22.
HarveyM. R. (1996).
An ecological view of psychological trauma and trauma recovery. Journal of Trauma Stress,
9(3), 3–23.
LefebvreH. (1970/2003). The urban revolution.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
27.
MalabouC. (2008). What should we do with our brain?
New York:
Fordham University Press.
28.
MalkkiL. (1992).
National geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthopology,
7(1), 24–44.
29.
MallettS. (2003).
Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review,
52(1), 62–89.
30.
MarxK. (1971). On revolution. The Karl Marx Library (Vol. 1)
.
New York:
McGraw-Hill Book Co.
31.
McLemanR.GemenneF. (2018). Routledge handbook of environmental displacement and migration.
Oxon, UK and New York:
Routledge.
32.
MooreS. F. (1975). Epilogue: Uncertainties in situations, indeterminacies in culture. In MooreS. F.MyerhoffB. G. (Eds.), Symbol and politics in communal ideology: Cases and questions (pp. 210–239).
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
33.
Nikulin, D. (2010). Dialectic and Dialogue. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
34.
ShieldsR. (1991). Places on the margin: Alternative geographies of modernity.
Oxford, UK:
Routledge.
35.
SojaE. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places (9th ed.).
Malden, MA:
Blackwell Publishers.
ThriftN. (2009). Space: The fundamental stuff of human geography. In CliffordN. R.HollowayS. L.RiceS. P. (Eds.), Key concepts in geography (pp. 95–107).
Los Angeles, CA:
Sage Publications.
38.
TurnerV. (1967). Betwixt-and-between: The liminal period in Rites de Passage. In The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual (pp. 93–111).
Ithaca, NY and London, UK:
Cornell University Press.
39.
TurnerV. (1977).
Process, system, and symbol: A new anthropological synthesis. Daedalus,
106(3), 61–80.
40.
ValsinerJ. (2012). Introduction: Culture in psychology: A renewal encounter of inquisitive minds. In The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 3–24).
Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
41.
von FoersterH. (2003). On constructing a reality. In Understanding understanding: Essays on cybernetics and cognition (pp. 212–217).
New York:
Springer-Verlag.
