The concept of distancing or polarization plays a central role in Werner and Kaplan’s account of symbol formation. It refers to the process of progressive differentiation and hierarchic integration of the four components constitutive of symbolic activity: addressor, addressee, symbolic vehicle and referent. Specifically, Werner and Kaplan suggest that distancing takes place between person and referent, between person and symbolic vehicle, between symbolic vehicle and referent and between addressor and addressee. We describe the theoretical context and different aspects of the distancing process. Furthermore, we argue that the distancing process identifies central prerequisites of symbolic activity that are largely ignored by contemporary developmental theories. We demonstrate the different aspects of the distancing process in several domains of symbolic development, including words, gestural development and pretend play. Finally, we compare Werner and Kaplan’s concept of distancing to ideas of distancing developed in recent developmental theories.
AcredoloL.GoodwynS. (1988) Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Development59: 450–466.
2.
AllenJ. W. P.BickhardM. H. (2013) Stepping off the pendulum: Why only an action-based approach can transcend the nativist–empiricist debate. Cognitive Development28: 96–133.
3.
BaillargeonR. (2008) Innate ideas revisited: For a principle of persistence in infants’ physical reasoning. Perspectives on Psychological Science3: 2–12.
4.
BaillargeonR.ScottR. M.HeZ. (2010) False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences14: 110–118.
5.
BeilinH.PearlmanE. G. (1991) Children’s iconic realism: Object vs. property realism. In: ReeseH. W. (eds) Advances in Child Development and BehaviorVol. 23New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 73–111.
6.
BibaceR.KharlamovN. (2013) The spiral: The concept of development after Werner and Kaplan. Culture & Psychology19(4): 453–462.
7.
BighamS.Bourchier-SuttonA. (2007) The decontextualization of form and function in the development of pretence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology25: 335–351.
8.
BoyatzisC. J.WatsonM. W. (1993) Preschool children’s symbolic representation of objects through gestures. Child Development64: 729–735.
9.
CarlsonS. M.DavisA. C.LeachJ. G. (2005) Less is more: Executive function and symbolic representation in preschool children. Psychological Science16: 609–616.
10.
CarpendaleJ. I. M.LewisC. (2010) The development of social understanding: A relational perspective. In: OvertonW. F. (eds) Cognition, Biology, and Methods across the Lifespan. Volume 1 of the Handbook of Life-Span Development, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 548–627.
11.
Cassirer, E. (1932/1985). Die Sprache und der Aufbau der Gegenstandswelt [Language and the construction of the objective world]. In E. W. Orth, & J. M. Krois (Eds.), Ernst Cassirer: Symbol, Technik, Sprache. Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1927–1933 [Ernst Cassirer: Symbol, technic, language: Essays from 1927 to 1933] (pp. 121–160). Hamburg, Germany: Felix MeinerVerlag.
12.
DickA. S.OvertonW. F.KovacsS. L. (2005) The development of symbolic coordination: Representation of imagined objects, executive function, and theory of mind. Journal of Cognition and Development6: 133–161.
13.
FensonL.RamsayD. S. (1980) Decentration and integration of the child’s play in the second year. Child Development51: 171–178.
14.
FodorJ. A. (1975) The language of thought, New York, NY: Crowell.
15.
FodorJ. A. (1980) Fixation of belief and concept acquisition. In: Piattelli-PalmeriniM. (eds) Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 142–149.
16.
GehlenA. (1940/1988) Man, his nature and place in the world, New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
GillespieA.ZittounT. (2013) Meaning making in motion: Bodies and minds moving in institutional and semiotic structures. Culture & Psychology19(4): 518–532.
18.
HerderJ. G. (1966) Essay on the origin of language. In: MoranJ. H.GodeA. (eds) On the origin of language, New York, NY: Frederick Ungar Publishing, Co, pp. 87–166.
19.
HerderJ. G. (1772/1985) Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache, Stuttgart, Germany: Reclam.
20.
HowesC.MathesonC. (1992) Sequences in the development of competent play with peers: Social and social pretend play. Developmental Psychology28: 961–978.
21.
JackowitzE. R.WatsonM. W. (1980) Development of object transformation in early pretend play. Developmental Psychology16: 543–549.
22.
JonasH. (1966) The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
23.
KesselringT.MüllerU. (2011) The concept of egocentrism in the context of Piaget’s theory. New Ideas in Psychology29: 327–345.
24.
LegersteeM. (1998) Mental and bodily awareness in infancy: Consciousness of self-existence. Journal of Consciousness Studies5: 627–644.
25.
LevyE. T.McNeillD. (2013) Narrative development as symbol formation: Gestures, imagery and the emergence of cohesion. Culture & Psychology19(4): 548–569.
26.
LibenL. (2008) Embodiment and children’s understanding of the real and represented world. In: OvertonW. F.MüllerU.NewmanJ. (eds) Developmental perspectives on embodiment and consciousness, New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, pp. 191–224.
27.
McCuneL. (1995) A normative study of representational play at the transition to language. Developmental Psychology31: 198–206.
28.
McCune-NicolichL. (1981) Toward symbolic functioning: Structure of early pretend games and potential parallels with language. Child Development52: 785–797.
29.
McCuneL. (2010) Developing symbolic activities. In: WagonerB. (eds) Symbolic transformation: The mind in movement through culture and society, London, UK: Routledge, pp. 193–208.
30.
MetcalfeJ.MischelW. (1999) A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review106: 3–19.
31.
MeltzoffA. N. (2007) ‘Like me’: A foundation for social cognition. Developmental Science10: 126–134.
32.
Mischel, W., & Baker, N. (1975). Cognitive appraisals and transformations in delay behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 254–261.
33.
MorfordJ. P.SingletonJ. L.Goldin-MeadowS. (1995) The genesis of language: How much time is needed to generate arbitrary symbols n a sign system. In: EmmoreyK.ReilleyJ. (eds) Language, gesture, and space, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 313–332.
34.
MüllerU.CarpendaleJ. I. M.BibokM.RacineT. P. (2006) Subjectivity, identification, and differentiation: Key issues in early social development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development71: 167–179.
35.
MüllerU.CarpendaleJ. I. M. (2004) The development of social understanding in infancy. In: CarpendaleJ. I. M.MüllerU. (eds) Social interaction and the development of knowledge, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 215–238.
36.
MüllerU.GiesbrechtG. (2008) Methodological and epistemological issues in the interpretation of infant cognitive development. Child Development79: 1654–1658.
37.
MüllerU.RacineT. P. (2010) The development of representation and concepts. In: LernerR. M.OvertonW. F. (eds) The handbook of life-span development, Vol. 1: Cognition, biology, and methods, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp. 346–390.
38.
MüllerU.SokolB.OvertonW. F. (1998) Reframing a constructivist model of the development of mental representation: The role of higher-order operations. Developmental Review18: 155–201.
39.
MusattiT.MayerS. (1987) Object substitution: Its nature and function in early in early pretend play. Human Development30: 225–235.
40.
NamyL. L. (2008) Recognition of iconicity doesn’t come for free. Developmental Science11: 841–846.
41.
O’ReillyA. W. (1995) Using representations: Comprehension and production of actions with imagined objects. Child Development66: 999–1010.
42.
OvergaardS. (2006) The problem of other minds: Wittgenstein’s phenomenologicalperspective. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science5: 53–73.
43.
OvertonW. F.JacksonJ. P. (1973) The representation of imagined objects in action sequences: A developmental study. Child Development44: 309–314.
44.
PernerJ. (2010) Who took the co out of cognitive science? Mentalism in an era of anticognitivism. In: FrenschP. A.SchwarzerR. (eds) International perspectives on psychological scienceVol. 1New York, NY: Psychology Press, pp. 241–261.
45.
PiagetJ. (1945/1962) Play, dreams, and imitation in children, New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.
46.
Plessner, H. (1928). Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch [The levels of the organic and the human being]. Berlin, Germany: Göschen.
47.
Scheler, M. (1923/1970). The nature of sympathy (transl. by P. Heath). New York, NY: Archon Book.
48.
Straus, E. W. (1956/1963). The primary world of senses. London: Glencoe.
49.
TaylorC. (1971) What is involved in a genetic psychology? In: MischelT. (eds) Cognitive development and epistemology, New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 393–416.
50.
Ter HarkM. (2006) Wittgenstein, pretend play and the transferred use of language. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour36: 299–318.
51.
TrevarthenC.AitkenK. J. (2001) Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry42: 3–48.
52.
Von Uexküll, J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere (The external and internal world of animals). Berlin, Germany: Julius Springer Verlag.
53.
Von UexküllJ. (1934/1957) A stroll through the worlds of animals and men. A picture book of invisible worlds. In: SchillerC. H. (eds) Instinctive behavior. The development of a modern concept, New York, NY: International Universities Press, pp. 5–80.
54.
VygotskyL. S. (1934/1986) Thought and language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55.
VygotskyL.LuriaA. (1994) Tool and symbol in child development. In: vander VeerR.ValsinerJ. (eds) The Vygotsky reader, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 99–174.
56.
WatsonM. W.JackowitzE. R. (1984) Agents and recipients in the development of early object play. Child Development55: 1091–1097.
57.
WatzlawikM. (2013) Do you believe in magic. Culture & Psychology19(4): 506–517.
58.
WernerH. (1934/1978) Unity of the senses. In: BartenS. S.FranklinM. B. (eds) Developmental processes: Heinz Werner's selected writings. Vol. 1: General theory and perceptual experience, New York, NY: International Universities Press, Inc, pp. 107–130.
59.
Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development (2nd ed.). Chicago: Follett Publishing.
60.
WernerH.KaplanB. (1963) Symbol formation: An organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
61.
ZahaviD. (2008) Simulation, projection, empathy. Consciousness and Cognition17: 514–522.
62.
ZelazoP. D. (1999) Language, levels of consciousness, and the development of intentional action. In: ZelazoP. D.AstingtonJ. W.OlsonD. R. (eds) Developing theories of intention: Social understanding and self-control, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 95–117.
63.
ZelazoP. D. (2004) The development of conscious control in childhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences8: 12–17.
64.
ZelazoP. D.JacquesS. (1996) Children’s rule use: Representation, reflection, and cognitive control. Annals of Child Development12: 119–176.
65.
ZelazoP. D.MüllerU.FryeD.MarcovitchS. (2003) The development of executive function in early childhood: VI. The development of executive function: Cognitive complexity and control–revised. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development68: 93–119.
