Abstract
Taking Jürgen Müller’s (2012) article The sound of history and acoustic memory: Where psychology and history converge as a starting point, we make a critical reflection about the way in which sound has been represented in history and the many ways in which the intersection between sound and history has been understood. We centre our critique on two components of Müller’s work. The first of these is a bias according to which the past is seen as a reality that can be accessed directly, as if one could travel back in time. The second is the mixture of different aspects in the definition of the historiography of sound, including levels, methods, objects and very disparate subjects under study. We suggest that the experience of the past is necessarily mediated by the conditions of the present, and the work of historiography is always subject to certain intentions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
