The paper engages with Jahoda’s (2012) and Moghaddam’s (2012) papers and examines Jahoda’s stand of not seeking to define culture because of the problems posed by the term. It is argued that clarification of a concept can be achieved through systematic analysis of definitions of a term and an acceptable definition can be co-constructed. Definitions are seen important where social policies are to be formulated. Moghaddam’s concept of “omniculturalism” is found problematic in addressing issues related to religious fundamentalism as it does not contest the policies and values of neo-liberalism enshrined in globalization. We suggest an alternate twin strategy that will first address problems of structural inequalities and injustice, followed by intergroup dialoguing involving various religious groups to deal with the processes that lead to creation of the other.
AdamsGMarkusH(2004) Toward a conception of culture suitable for a social psychology of culture. In: SchallerMMahwahC (eds). The Psychological Foundations of Culture. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 335–360.
2.
AndersenB (1983) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, UK: Verso.
3.
BanoSMishraR C (2006) Effect of schooling on the development of social identity and prejudice in Hindu and Muslim children. Indian Journal of Community Psychology, 2, 168–182.
CarnapR (1956) Meaning and necessity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
ChandraBMahajanS (2007) Composite culture in a multicultural society. New Delhi, India: Pearson Longman.
11.
CrockerJLuhtanenR (1990) Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60–67.
12.
Das, M. M. (1991). The other truth of literature and religion. Allahabad University Teachers’ Association Monograph, No. 2–3, November, 1991.
13.
DeRidderRTripathiR C (1992) Norm violation and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Clarendon Press.
14.
DimaggioPMarkusH R (2010) Culture and social psychology: Converging perspectives. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 347–352.
15.
EvansP (2008) Is an alternative globalization possible?Politics & Society, 36(2), 271–305.
16.
JahodaG (1984) Do we need a concept of culture?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 139–151.
17.
JahodaG (1993) The colour of a chameleon: Perspectives on the concept of culture. Cultural Dynamics, 6, 277–285.
18.
JahodaG(2011) Past and present of cross-cultural psychology. In: van de VijverF J RChastiosisABreugelmansS M (eds). Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 37–64.
19.
JahodaG (2012) Critical reflections on some recent definitions of “culture”. Culture & Psychology, 18(3), 289–303.
20.
KelmanH C (2010) Conflict resolution and reconciliation: A social-psychological perspective on ending violent conflict between identity groups. Landscapes of Violence. Vol 1: No. 1, Article 5.
21.
LouxM J (1976) Universals and particulars: Readings in ontology. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
22.
LevineR ACampbellD T (1972) Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes and group behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley.
23.
MeadG HMorrisC W (1934) Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviourist, Vol. 13, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
24.
MehtaJ K (1985) Gandhian thought: An analytical study. New Delhi, India: Ashish Publishing House.
25.
MillerJ G (1978) Living systems. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
26.
MishraR C(1997) Cognition and cognitive development. In: BerryJ WDasenP RSaraswathiT S (eds). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol 2, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 147–179.
27.
MishraR CBanoS (2003) Ethnic identity and bias in Hindu and Muslim children. Social Science International, 19, 52–64.
28.
MoghaddamF M (2009) Omniculturalism: Policy solutions to fundamentalism in the era of fractured globalization. Culture and Psychology, 15, 337–347.
29.
MoghaddamF M (2012) The omnicultural imperative. Culture & Psychology, 18(3), 304–330.
30.
NandyA (1983) The Intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
31.
NorenzayenAHeineS J (2005) Psychological universals: What are they, and how can we know?Psychological Bulletin, 131, 763–784.
32.
PatrickG M(1984) Political culture. In: SartoriG (ed.) Social science concepts: A systematic analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 265–314.
33.
RoyR (2003) Samskar. New Delhi, India: Shipra Publications.
34.
SartoriG (1984) Social science concepts: A systematic analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
SegalH HCampbellD THerskovitzM J (1966) The influence of culture on visual perception. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
36.
SenA (2009) The idea of justice. London: Penguin Books.
37.
SherifMHarveyO JWhiteB JHoodW RSherifC W (1961) Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.
TajfelH (1970) Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102.
41.
TajfelH (1978) Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London, UK: Academic Press.
42.
TomaselliK G (1996) Appropriating images: The semiotics of visual representation. Hojbjerg, Denmark: Intervention Press.
43.
TripathiR C (2010) Poverty alleviation: Is it only tilting at the windmills?Psychology & Developing Societies, 22, 201–220.
44.
TripathiR CGhoshE S KKumarR(2012) Hindu-Muslim divide: Building sustainable bridges. In: TripathiR CSinhaY (eds). Psychology and social policy in India. Jaipur, India: Rawat.
45.
ValsinerJHanG (2008) Where is culture in the dialogical perspectives on the self?International Journal for Dialogical Science, 3, 1–8.
46.
WalkerL OAvantK C (2005) Strategies for theory construction in Nursing, 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
47.
ZunigaXNagdaB ACheslerMCytron-WalkerA (2007) Intergroup dialogue in higher education: Meaningful learning about social justice. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Series, 32(4), 1–128.
