In this commentary we argue that in order to understand how joint understanding arises out of activity, a cultural examination of communication and interaction must be included in the analysis. In their article “The tension between dialogicality and interobjectivity in cooperative activities,” Talamo and Pozzi (2011) argue that intersubjectivity should be thought of as a process that occurs in group interaction and collaboration. We agree with the authors that intersubjectivity is not something that is located inside people’s heads and that intersubjectivity is not “mind reading.” However, we argue that their plan of analysis lacks an examination of the cultural milieu in which both the personal and the social happen. By not bringing a cultural lens to bear in their analysis they have privileged verbal interactions and painted an incomplete picture of the phenomenon. We provide evidence from cultural comparative work on the different ways that joint understanding and joint activity can be viewed culturally to highlight how cultural understandings of communication are key in interaction.
AngelilloC.RogoffB. (2005). Coordination among siblings of European American middle-class and Mexican-descent engaging with a science exhibit. Paper presented at the meetings of the International Society for Cultural and Activity Research, Seville, Spain.
2.
ApperlyI. (2011). Mindreaders: The cognitive basis of “theory of mind”. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
3.
BassoK. (1970). To give up on words: Silence in Western Apache culture. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 26(3), 213–230.
4.
ChavajayP.RogoffB. (1999). Cultural variation in management of attention by children and their caregivers. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1079–1090.
5.
Correa-ChávezM.RogoffB. (2009). Children’s attention to interactions directed to others. Developmental Psychology, 45, 630–641.
6.
DixonS. D.LeVineR. A.RichmanA.BrazeltonT. B. (1984). Mother–child interaction around a teaching task: An African-American comparison. Child Development, 55, 1252–1264.
7.
EllisS.GauvainM. (1992). Social and cultural influences on children’s collaborative interactions. In WinegarL. T.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), Children’s development within social context (Vol. 2, pp. 155–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
KimH. S. (2002). We talk therefore we think? A cultural analysis of the effect of talking on thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 828–842.
9.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
LaosaL. M. (1982). School, occupation, culture and family: The impact of parental schooling on the parent-child relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 791–827.
11.
LiJ. (2008). Cultural frames of children’s learning beliefs. In JensenL. A. (Ed.), Bridging cultural and developmental psychology: New synthesis in theory and policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
LiJ. (2005). Mind or Virtue: Western and Chinese beliefs about learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 190–194.
13.
LigorioM. B.TalamoA.SimonsR. J. (2002). Synchronic tutoring of a community on-line. Mentoring and Tutoring, 10(2), 137–152.
14.
LópezA.Correa-ChávezM.RogoffB. (2010). Attention to instruction directed to another by U.S. Mexican-heritage children of varying cultural backgrounds. Developmental Psychology, 46(3), 593–601.
15.
Mejía-ArauzR.RogoffB.DexterA.NajafiB. (2007). Cultural variation in children’s social organization. Child Development, 78(3), 1001–1014.
16.
MoghaddamF. M. (2003). Interobjectivity and Culture. Culture & Psychology, 9(3), 221–232.
17.
MorelliG. A.RogoffB.AngelilloC. (2003). Cultural variation in young children’s access to work or involvement in specialised child-focused activities. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 264–274.
18.
OchsE.SchieffelinB. B. (1984). Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In ShwederR.LeVineR. (Eds.), Culture and its acquisition (pp. 276–320). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
PelletierW. (1970). Childhood in an Indian village. In RepoS. (Ed.), This book is about schools (pp. 18–31). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
20.
RobertsA. L. D.RogoffB. (in press). Children’s reflections on cultural differences in ways of working together. International Journal of Educational Psychology.
21.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
RogoffB.MistryJ.GöncüA.MosierC. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activities by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, (Serial No. 236).
23.
RogoffB.MooreL.NajafiB.DexterA.Correa-ChávezM.SolísJ. (2007). Cultural routines and practices. In GrusecJ.HastingsP. (Eds.), The handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 490–515). New York, NY: Guilford.
24.
RogoffB.ParadiseR.Mejía-ArauzR.Correa-ChávezM.AngelilloC. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175–203.
25.
RuvalcabaO.RogoffB.LópezA.Correa-ChávezM.GutierrezK. (2011). Nonverbal Respeto in Requests for Help by Mexican-heritage and European-heritage Children. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26.
SilvaK. G.Correa-ChávezM.RogoffB. (2010). Mexican-heritage children’s attention and learning from interactions directed to others. Child Development, 81(3), 898–912.
27.
TalamoA.PozziS. (2011). The tension between dialogicality and intersubjectiviey in cooperative activities. Culture & Psychology, 17(3), 302–318.
28.
TalamoA.ZucchermaglioC.LigorioM. B. (2001). Communities’ Development in CVEs and sustaining functions of on-line tutorship. Paper presented at the Cyberpsychology: Mind, cognition and society in the Internet-Age IOS, Amsterdam.
29.
TrevarthenC. (1999). Intersubjectivity. In WilsonR. A.KeilF. C. (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 415–419). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
