A linguistic and cognitive process that has received scant attention in mainstream developmental psychology is the use of a geocentric frame of spatial reference, which amounts to using a large-scale orientation system (such as cardinal directions) in describing and encoding the location of objects on table space, inside a room. As part of a larger cross-cultural study of the development of this process, in India, Indonesia and Nepal, we present here a study on the possible implications of using a geocentric frame of reference in developing an accurate dead-reckoning skill. Children aged 11 to 15 years in two types of schools in Varanasi, India, who were known from a pretest to use a geocentric frame in language and cognition, were blindfolded, spun around and led blindfolded to a second room. A majority of them were able to keep track of cardinal directions despite these disorienting procedures. They were interviewed about the processes and sources of their skill.
Brooks, R.A. ( 1991) How to build complete creatures rather than isolated cognitive simulators. In K. VanLehn (Ed.), Architectures for intelligence: The 22nd Carnegie-Mellon symposium on cognition (pp. 225-239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
Burch, D. ( 1986). Emergency navigation. Camden, ME: International Marine.
3.
Cablitz, G. ( 2006). Marquesan-a grammar of space. Berlin : Walter de Gruyter.
4.
Cornell, E.H., & Heth, D.C. ( 2004). Memories of travel: Dead reckoning within the cognitive map. In G.A. Allen (Ed.), Human spatial memory: Remembering where (pp. 191-215). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
5.
Cottereau-Reiss, P. ( 1999). L’espace kanak ou comment ne pas perdre son latin!Annales de la Fondation Fyssen, 14, 34-45.
6.
Dasen, P.R. ( 2003). Theoretical frameworks in cross-cultural developmental psychology: An attempt at integration. In T.S. Saraswathi (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in human development (pp. 128-165). New Delhi/ Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Dasen, P.R., Mishra, R.C., Niraula, S., & Wassmann, J. ( 2006). Développement du langage et de la cognition spatiale géocentrique. Enfance, 58, 146-158.
8.
Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Gladwin, T. ( 1970). East is a Big Bird: Navigation and logic on Puluwat Atoll . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Greidanus, E. ( 2002). The representation of dead reckoning during a suburban walk. Unpublished manuscript, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
11.
Gumperz, J.J., & Levinson, S.C. (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Hegarty, M. ( 2004). Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 280-285.
13.
Hutchins, E. ( 1983). Understanding Micronesian navigation. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 191-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Huttenlocher, J. ( 2005). Mental representation. In J. Rieser, J. Lockman, & C. Nelson (Eds.), Action as organizer of learning and development (pp. 221-241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
15.
Klatzky, R.L. ( 1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations. Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K.F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representation and processing of spatial knowledge (pp. 1-17). Berlin: Springer-Verlag .
16.
Lakoff, G., & Núñes, R.E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Levinson, S. ( 2003). Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Mishra, R.C., & Dasen, P.R. ( 2005). Spatial language and cognitive development in India: An urban/rural comparison. In W. Friedelmeier , P. Chakkarath, & B. Schwarz (Eds.), Culture and human development: The importance of cross-cultural research to the social sciences (pp. 153-179). New York: Psychology Press.
19.
Mishra, R.C., & Dasen, P.R. ( 2007). The methodological interface of psychology and anthropology . In J. Wassmann & K. Stockhaus (Eds.), Experiencing new worlds (pp. 21-35). Oxford: Berghahn.
20.
Mishra, R.C., Dasen, P., & Niraula, S. ( 2003). Ecology, language and performance on spatial cognitive tasks. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 366-383.
21.
Mishra, R.C., & Vajpayee, A. ( 2008). Sanskrit schools in India. In P.R. Dasen & A. Akkari (Eds.), Educational theories and practices from the majority world (pp. 245-267). New Delhi: Sage.
22.
Mittelstaedt, H., & Mittelstaedt, M.L. (1982). Homing by path integration . In F. Papi & H. Wallraff (Eds.), Avian navigation (pp. 290-297). Berlin: Springer.
23.
Newcombe, N.S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2006). Development of spatial cognition. In W. Damon, R.M. Lerner, D. Kuhn , & R.S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception and language (pp. 734-776). New York: Wiley.
24.
Niraula, S., Mishra, R.C., & Dasen, P. ( 2004). Linguistic relativity and spatial concept evelopment in Nepal. Psychology and Developing Societies, 17, 99-124.
25.
Piaget, J. ( 1986). Six psychological studies. New York : Vintage.
26.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder. B. ( 1967). The child’s conception of space. New York: Norton. (Original work published 1948.)
27.
Pederson, E. ( 1993). Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In A.U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial information theory (pp. 294-311). Berlin: Springer.
28.
Rieser, J.J. ( 1999). Dynamic spatial orientation and the coupling of representation and action. In R. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes (pp. 168-190). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29.
Simmering, V.R., & Spencer, J.P. ( 2007). Carving up space at imaginary joints: Can people mentally impose arbitrary spatial category boundaries? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 871-894.
30.
Spelke, E.S., & Newport, E. ( 1998). Nativism, empiricism, and the development of knowledge . In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 165-179). New York: Wiley.
31.
Taylor, H.A., & Tversky, B. ( 1996). Perspective in spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 371-391.
32.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. ( 1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
33.
Troadec, B. ( 2007). Psychologie culturelle : Le développement cognitif est-il culturel?Paris: Belin.
34.
Vajpayee, A., Dasen, P.R., & Mishra, R.C. ( 2008). Spatial encoding: A comparison of Sanskrit- and Hindi-medium schools. In N. Srinivasan, A.K. Gupta & J. Pandey (Eds.), Advances in cognitive science (pp. 255-265). New Delhi: Sage.
35.
Valsiner, J. ( 2000). Culture and human development: An introduction. London: Sage.
36.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press. (Original work published 1934.)
37.
Warren, W.H. ( 2005). Information, representation and dynamics: A discussion of the chapters by Lee, von Hofsten, and Adolf. In J. Rieser, J. Lockman, & C. Nelson (Eds.), Action as organizer of learning and development (pp. 123-36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
