Matusov's article defines two trajectories in the development of Vygotsky's academic
heritage. We show that it is necessary to consider a continuous scale where the two
lines of development are just polar points. We state that the problem cannot be
solved in relation to Vygotsky's theory, but requires a wider view on power
relations within the world. Vygotsky's focus on consciousness is viewed as limiting
the extent of social determination of thinking by researchers in various societies.
Matusov's effort outlines the need to return to the study of consciousness.
Allakhverdov, V.
(2000). Soznanie kak paradox (Consciousness as a
paradox) .
St Petersburg
, Russia:
DNK
.
2.
Allakhverdov, V.
, &
Ivanov, M.
(2006). Soznanie i psixicheskie processy: Pedagodika i
psihologija (Consciousness and cognitive processes. Psychology and
pedagogy) , pp. 36—59. St
Petersburg: PGUPS .
3.
Johnson-Laird, P.N.
(1983). Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of
language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University
Press.
Matusov, E.
(2008).
Applying a sociocultural approach to Vygotskian academia: `Our tsar isn't
like yours, and yours isn't like ours'
. Culture & Psychology, 14(1),
5—35.
6.
Russell, B.
(1946). A history of Western philosophy and its connection
with political and social circumstances from the earliest times to the present
day. New York: Simon
& Schuster .
