Supplementarity and Surplus: Moving between the Dimensions of Otherness

Abstract

I start by attempting to clarify the ways in which Coelho and Figueiredo (2003) use the logic of supplementarity to conceptualize the discourses on intersubjectivity in terms of four dimensions of otherness. A new domain of application is proposed and the limits of the approach are pointed to. In the second section I critically examine the extent to which these four dimensions, and the movements of supplementarity between them, adequately capture the theories of intersubjectivity. The use of these dimensions seems, on the one hand, to obfuscate several interesting contradictions between the theoretical approaches within the dimensions, and, on the other hand, to artificially partition the theoretical traditions between the four dimensions. In the final section, Mead's account of intersubjectivity, and the constitution of subjectivity, is presented, and developed, as operating in the spaces between the proposed dimensions of otherness.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .

Bakhtin, M.M. (1990). Author and hero in aesthetic activity (V. Liapunov, Trans.). In M. Holquist & V. Liapunov (Eds.), Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press . (Original work published 1923.)

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin .

Coelho, N.E., Jr., & Figueiredo, L.C. (2003). Patterns of intersubjectivity in the constitution of subjectivity: Dimensions of otherness . Culture & Psychology, 9(3), 193-208 .

Crossley, N. (1996). Intersubjectivity: The fabric of social becoming. London: Sage .

Derrida, J. (1974). Of grammatology (G.C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press . (Original work published 1967.)

Dodds, A.E., Lawrence, J.A., & Valsiner, J. (1997). The personal and the social: Mead's theory of the `generalized other' . Theory & Psychology, 7(4), 483-503 .

Farr, R.M. (1996). The roots of modern social psychology: 1874-1954. Oxford: Blackwell .

Goffman, E. (1956). Embarrassment and social organization . American Journal of Sociology, 62(3), 264-271 .

10.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin .

11.

Green, A. (2000). The intrapsychic and intersubjective in psychoanalysis . Psychoanalytic Quarterly, LXIX, 1-39 .

12.

Ichheiser, G. (1949). Misunderstandings in human relations: A study in false social perception . American Journal of Sociology, 55(Suppl.), 1-72 .

13.

James, W. (1884). On some omissions of introspective psychology . Mind, 9(33), 1-26 .

14.

Levinas, E. (1998). On thinking-of-the-other: Entre nous (M.B. Smith & B. Harshav, Trans.). London: Athlone . (Original work published 1991.)

15.

Marková, I. (1982). Paradigms, thought and language. Chichester: Wiley .

16.

Mead, G.H. (1913). The social self . Journal of Philosophy, 10, 374-380 .

17.

Mead, G.H. (1926). The nature of aesthetic experience . International Journal of Ethics, 36(4), 382-393 .

18.

Mead, G.H. (1932). The objective reality of perspectives. In A.E. Murphy (Ed.), The philosophy of the present. Chicago, IL: Open Court .

19.

Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .

20.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge . (Original work published 1945.)

21.

Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. London: Wiley .

22.

Schütz, A. (1941). William James' concept of the stream of thought phenomenologically interpreted . Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1(4), 442-452 .

23.

Winnicott, D.W. (1971). Playing and reality. New York: Brunner-Routledge .