Socioculturalists are divided on two of the foundational theoretical claims of the paradigm: a process ontologyof the social world; and the inseparabilityof the individual and the group. A process ontology holds that only processes are real; entities, structures or patterns are ephemeral and do not really exist. Inseparability is the claim that the individual and the social cannot be methodologically or ontologically distinguished. To clarify the different stances toward these claims held by socioculturalists, I draw on the contemporary sociological debate between Anthony Giddens and Margaret Archer. Giddens’ structuration theory holds to a process ontology and to inseparability, while Archer’s emergentist theory rejects both. I borrow the terms of this debate to clarify the tensions among several prominent socioculturalists, including Cole, Lave and Wenger, Rogoff, Shweder, Valsiner, and Wertsch. I argue that a strong form of inseparability is theoretically problematic and empirically untenable, and I conclude that socioculturalists can resolve these tensions by adopting an ‘analytic dualism’ that retains key sociocultural commitments.
Abbott, A.
(1995). Things of boundaries. Social Research, 62(4), 857–882.
2.
Alexander, J.C.
, Giesen, B., Münch, R., & Smelser, N.J. (Eds.). (1987). The micro–macro link. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3.
Archer, M.S.
(1988). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Archer, M.S.
(1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bauman, Z.
(1973). Culture as praxis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6.
Bruner, J.
(1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Carelli, M.G.
(1998). Internalization, participation, and ethnocentrism. Human Development, 41, 355–359.
8.
Cole, M.
(1995). The supra-individual envelope of development: Activity and practice, situation and context. In J.J. Goodnow, P.J. Miller, & F. Kessel (Eds.), Cultural practices as contexts for development(Vol. 67, pp. 105–118). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Cole, M.
(1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Cooley, C.H.
(1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.
11.
Craib, I.
(1992). Anthony Giddens. New York: Routledge.
12.
Domingues, J.M.
(1995). Sociological theory and collective subjectivity. New York: St Martin’s Press.
13.
Forman, E.A.
, Minick, N., & Stone, C.A. (Eds.). (1993). Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Giddens, A.
(1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Giddens, A.
(1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Giddens, A.
(1989). Areply to my critics. In D. Held & J.B. Thompson (Eds.), Social theory of modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics(pp. 249–301). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Gregson, N.
(1989). On the (ir)relevance of structuration theory to empirical research. In D. Held & J.B. Thompson (Eds.), Social theory of modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics(pp. 235–248). New York: Cambridge.
18.
Hatano, G.
, & Wertsch, J.V. (2001). Sociocultural approaches to cognitive development: The constitutions of culture in mind. Human Development, 44, 77–83.
19.
Huber, J.
(1991). Macro–micro linkages in sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Hutchins, E.
(1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Knorr-Cetina, K.
, & Cicourel, A.V. (Eds.). (1981). Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
22.
Lave, J.
(1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context(pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Lave, J.
, & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Lawrence, J.A.
, & Valsiner, J. (1993). Conceptual roots of internalization: From transmission to transformation. Human Development, 36, 150–167.
25.
Layder, D.
(1981). Structure, interaction and social theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
26.
Layder, D.
(1985). Power, structure and agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 15(2), 131–149.
27.
Layder, D.
(1987). Key issues in structuration theory: Some critical remarks. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 8, 25–46.
28.
Matusov, E.
(1998). When solo activity is not privileged: Participation and internalization models of development. Human Development, 41, 326–349.
29.
Mead, G.H.
(1932). The philosophy of the present. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Miller, B.D.
(1995). Precepts and practices: Researching identity formation among Indian Hindu adolescents in the United States. In J.J. Goodnow, P.J. Miller, & F. Kessel (Eds.), Cultural practices as contexts for development(Vol. 67, pp. 71–85). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Nicolopoulou, A.
, & Cole, M. (1993). Generation and transmission of shared knowledge in the culture of collaborative learning: The Fifth Dimension, its play-world, and its institutional contexts. In E.A. Forman, N. Minick, & C.A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development(pp. 283–314). New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Ritzer, G.
(2000). Modern sociological theory. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
33.
Rogoff, B.
(1982). Integrating context and cognitive development. In M.E. Lamb & A.L. Brown (Eds.), Advances in developmental psychology(Vol. 2, pp. 125–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
Rogoff, B.
(1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Rogoff, B.
(1992). Three ways to relate person and culture: Thoughts sparked by Valsiner’s review of Apprenticeship in thinking. Human Development, 35, 316–320.
36.
Rogoff, B.
(1997). Evaluating development in the process of participation: Theory, methods, and practice building on each other. In E. Amsel & A.Renninger (Eds.), Change and development(pp. 265–285). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
Rogoff, B.
(1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In D. Kuhn & R.S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language(5th ed., pp. 679–744). New York: Wiley.
38.
Sawyer, R.K.
(2001). Emergence in sociology: Contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 551–585.
39.
Schelling, T.C.
(1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.
40.
Shweder, R.A.
(1990). Cultural psychology—What is it? In J.W. Stigler, R.A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development(pp. 1–43). New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Shweder, R.A.
(1995). The confessions of a methodological individualist. Culture & Psychology, 1, 115–122.
42.
Smith, J.W.
, & Turner, B.S. (1986). Constructing social theory and constituting society. Theory, Culture & Society, 3(2), 125–132.
43.
Stigler, J.W.
, Shweder, R.A., & Herdt, G. (Eds.). (1990). Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Suchman, L.A.
(1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human–machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Sztompka, P.
(1994). Society as social becoming: Beyond individualism and collectivism. In P. Sztompka (Ed.), Agency and structure: Reorienting social theory(pp. 251–282). Yverdon: Gordon & Breach.
46.
Thompson, J.B.
(1989). The theory of structuration. In D. Held & J.B.Thompson (Eds.), Social theory in modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics(pp. 56–76). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Valsiner, J.
(1989). Human development and culture: The social nature of personality and its study. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
48.
Valsiner, J.
(1991). Building theoretical bridges over a lagoon of everyday events. Human Development, 34, 307–315.
49.
Valsiner, J.
(1998a). Dualisms displaced: From crusades to analytic distinctions. Human Development, 41, 350–354.
50.
Valsiner, J.
(1998b). The guided mind: A sociogenetic approach to personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
Vygotsky, L.S.
(1978). Mind in society(A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
Wagner, H.R.
(1964). Displacement of scope: Aproblem of the relationship between small-scale and large-scale sociological theories. American Journal of Sociology, 64(6), 571–584.
53.
Wartofsky, M.W.
(1979). Models: Representation and the scientific understanding. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
54.
Wertsch, J.V.
(1993). Commentary. Human Development, 36, 168–171.
55.
Wertsch, J.V.
(1994). The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 202–208.
56.
Wertsch, J.V.
(1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In J.V.Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56–74). New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Wertsch, J.V.
(1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
