The Dialogical Self: Converging East

Abstract

Prompted by the work of Hermans, we attempt to construct the dialogical self informed by Eastern traditions. To describe dialogical phenomenology, we turn to three resources: (a) Chinese intellectual traditions, (b) dreams and (c) daily life. Dialogical attributes are described: the dialogical self is capable of polyvocality, but also of achieving unity with diversity; metacognition is vital to its development. We attempt to clarify the relation between dialogics and dialectics: The dialogical self is capable of taking an active part in the interaction between inner and outer dialectics, and hence of participating in its own creation and transformation. Finally, we illustrate how the study of dialogical movements may be operationalized.

Keywords

Chinese dialectics dialogical metacognition relationalism self

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bain, B. (1996). Pathways to the peak of Mount Piaget and Vygotsky: Speaking and cognizing monologically and bilingually.Rome: Belzoni Editore.

Bakhtin, M.M. (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics(2nd ed.; R.W. Rotsel, Trans.). Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis. (Original work published 1929)

Cooley, C.H. (1964). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schocken. (Original work published 1902)

Hermans, H.J.M. (1999). Dialogical thinking and self-innovation. Culture & Psychology, 5(1), 67–87.

Hermans, H.J.M. (2001a). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology,7(3), 243–281.

Hermans, H.J.M. (2001b). The construction of a Personal Position Repertoire: Method and practice. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 323–365.

Hilgard, E. (1949). Human motives and the concept of the self. American Psychologist, 4, 374–382.

Ho, D.Y.F. (1988). The conception of human nature in Mao Tse-tung Thought. In A.C. Paranjpe , D.Y.F. Ho , & R.W. Rieber (Eds.), Asian contributions to psychology(pp. 235–250). New York: Praeger.

Ho, D.Y.F. (2000). Dialectical thinking: Neither Eastern nor Western. American Psychologist, 55, 1064–1065.

10.

Ho, D.Y.F. , Peng, S.Q. , Lai, A.C. , & Chan, S.F. (in press). Indigenization and beyond: Methodological relationalism in the study of personality across cultural traditions. Journal of Personality.

11.

Krauss, R.M. , & Chiu, C.-Y. (1998). Language and social behavior. In D.T. Gilbert , S.T. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology(Vol. 2;4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Paranjpe, A.C. (1998). Self and identity in modern psychology and Indian thought. New York: Plenum.

13.

Valsiner, J. (2000, June 23–26). Making meaning out of mind: Self-less and self-ful dialogicality.Presentation at the First International Conference on the Dialogical Self, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

The Dialogical Self: Converging East–West Constructions

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References