In this article I argue that creative acts cannot be confined to the individual. Creativity can be seen as a meeting between an individual and a wider activity system. This argument is related to the claim that a zone of proximal development (ZPD), the concept connected to the culturalhistorical psychologist Lev Vygotsky, is both an internal and an external relation between an actual and a potential developmental zone. I shall suggest that institutions can facilitate creative potential and development if the associated members are trained or already have potential developmental zones answering to the actual development of the members of staff. The argument is supported by two case studies—one from fieldwork in an institution of higher education, and one from an institution for the mentally handicapped—and supplemented with a few historical examples.
Ackroyd, P.
(1995). Blake: A biography.New York: Ballantine.
2.
Ardener, E.
(1989). The voice of prophecy. Oxford: Blackwell.
3.
Bateson, G.
(1989). Steps to an ecology of mind.New York: Ballantine. (Original work published 1972)
4.
Biagioli, M.
(1995). Tacit knowledge, courtliness and the scientist’s body. In S.L. Foster (Ed.), Choreographing history.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
5.
Cole, M.
, & Engestr^m, Y. (1993). Acultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Cole, M.
, & Scribner, S. (1978). Introduction. In L.S.Vygotsky, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes(M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Engestr^m, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research.Jyv‰skyl‰ss‰: Painettu Gummerus Oy’n kijapainossa.
8.
Engestr^m, Y.
(1990). Theater as a model system for learning to create. In Learning, working, imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orieta-Konsultit Oy.
9.
Engestr^m, Y.
(1993). Work as a testbench of activity theory. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Engestr^m, Y.
(1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformations. In Y. Engestr^m, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punam‰ki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Engestr^m, Y.
, Miettinen, R., & Punam‰ki, R.-L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Gardner, H.
(1994). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi.New York: Basic Books.
13.
Ghiselin, B.
(Ed.). (1985). The creative process: Reflections on the invention of arts and sciences.Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1952)
14.
Griffin, P.
, & Cole, M. (1984) Current activity for the future: The Zo-ped. In B. Rogoff & J.V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the zone of proximal development(pp. 45–64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Hasse, C. (2000). Kraftfeltet—kulturelle lrprocesser i det fysiske rum. PhD dissertation, University of Copenhagen.
16.
Hastrup, K.
(1995). A passage to anthropology: Between experience and theory. London: Routledge.
17.
John-Steiner, V.
(1997). Notebooks of the mind: Explorations of thinking(rev. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
Lave, J.
, & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Leontiev, A.N.
(1981). Problems of the development of mind. Moscow: Progress.
Schaefer-Simmern, H.
(1961). The unfolding of artistic activity: Its basis, processes and implications.Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Scribner, S.
(1985). Vygotsky’s uses of history. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskyan perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
van der Veer, R.
, & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis.Oxford: Blackwell.
24.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1935). O pedologicheskom analize pedagogicheskogo processa. In Umstvennoe razvitie detej v processe obuchenija. Moscow/Leningrad: Uchpedgiz. (Original work published 1933)
25.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1966). Igra i ee rol’v psikhicheskom razvitii rebenka. Vosprosy Psikhologii, 62–76. (Original work published 1933)
26.
Vygotsky, L.S.
(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes(M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
