Baron, J.
(1994). Thinking and deciding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Brunswik, E.
(1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255–272.
3.
Dawes, R.M.
(1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571–582.
4.
Hogarth, R.
(1987). Judgment and choice: The psychology of decision. Chichester: Wiley.
5.
Kahneman, D.
, Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.), (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Kahneman, D.
, & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases(pp. 201–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Miller, D.T.
, Turnbull, W., & McFarland, D.T. (1989). When a coincidence is suspicious: The role of mental simulation. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 57, 581–589.
8.
Nisbett, R.
, & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
Payne, J.W.
, Bettman, J.R., & Johnson, E.J. (1996). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Pelham, B.W.
, Sumarta, T.T., & Myaskovsky, L. (1994). The easy path from many to much: The numerosity heuristic. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 103–133.
11.
Simon, H.A.
(1956). Rational choice and the structure of environments. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.
12.
Teigen, K.H.
(1998). When the unreal is more likely than the real: Post hoc probability judgments and counterfactual closeness. Thinking and Reasoning, 4, 147–177.
13.
Thorndike, E. L.
(1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement, 2(8).
14.
Windschitl, P.D.
, & Wells, G.L. (1998). The alternative-outcomes effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1411–1423.
