Abstract
Both papers, Chandler (2000) and Shotter (2000), are concerned with ‘worldmaking’. Chandler focuses on the relationship between cultural vitality and the development of robust identities; Shotter, following Vygotsky and Goethe, focuses on the features that enable people to construct acceptable identities. Time conceptions are implicit in Chandler’s contribution; they are more explicit in Shotter’s paper emphasizing how research should be carried out. The latter paper leads to the suggestion that we construe time with metaphors other than those used to describe the spatial world.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
