What are the consequences of internationalization for the democratic legitimacy of governance? The argument developed in this article claims that de-democratization will take place as long as intergovernmental cooperation mechanisms offer national governments the opportunity to reassert state autonomy vis-a-vis increasingly assertive domestic and transnational societal pressures. Applied to the context of an emerging world society, the concept of raison d'état is employed in order to classify the concurrence of mutual self-commitment and dedemocratization as a predictable result of strategic interaction among national governments. The article argues that in order to overcome this serious, yet surmountable, obstacle to democratic governance beyond the state, the future architecture of global public policy will have to transcend the traditional frame of intergovernmentalism. Reflecting upon institutional designs to overcome the shortcomings of international governance, the author postulates that solutions cannot be based on the territorial-state majority-democracy model. Instead, a de-governmentalized polity for governance beyond the state is suggested which would be composed of functionally differentiated political arenas with different roles, participants and forms of representation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abromeit, Heidrun
(1998) Democracy in Europe. Legitimising Politics in a Non-State Polity. London: Berghahn.
2.
Bartelson, Jens
(1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bartelson, Jens
(1997) `Making Exceptions. Some Remarks on the Concept of Coup d'état and its History', Political Theory25(3): 323-346.
4.
Benz, Arthur
(1998) `Postparlamentarische Demokratie? Demokratische Legitimation im kooperativen Staat', in Michael Th. Greven (ed.) Demokratie — eine Kultur des Westens?, pp. 201-222. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
5.
Benz, Arthur
(1999) `Ansatzpunkte für ein europafähiges Demokratiekonzept', in Beate Kohler-Koch (ed.) Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. Special Issue 29, pp. 345-368. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
6.
Buzan, Barry
(1996) `The Timeless Wisdom of Realism?', in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski (eds) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, pp. 47-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Childers, Erskine
and Brian Urquart (1994) Renewing the United Nations System. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.
8.
Dahl, Robert A.
(1994) `A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation', Political Science Quarterly109(1): 23-34.
9.
Evans, Peter B.
(1993) `Building an Integrative Approach to International and Domestic Politics. Reflections and Projections', in Peter B. Evans, Harold K. Jacobson and Robert D. Putnam (eds) Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, pp. 397-430. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Evans, Peter B.
, Harold K. Jacobson and Robert D. Putnam (eds) (1993) Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Greven, Michael Th.
and Rainer Schmalz-Bruns (eds) (1999) Politische Theorie — heute. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
12.
Habermas, Jürgen
(1994) `Die Last der doppelten Vergangenheit', Die Zeit20: 54.
13.
Hasenclever, Andreas
, Peter Mayer and Volker Rittberger (1997) Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Held, David
(1991) `Democracy, the Nation-State and the Global System', Economy and Society20(2): 138-172.
15.
Held, David
(1995) Democracy and the Global Order. From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
Höffe, Otfried
(1987) Politische Gerechtigkeit. Grundlegung einer kritischen Philosophie von Recht und Staat. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
17.
Hudson, Valerie M.
, Susan M. Sims and John C. Thomas (1993) `The Domestic Political Context of Foreign Policy-Making: Explicating a Theoretical Construct', in David Skidmore and Valerie M. Hudson (eds) The Limits of State Autonomy. Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formulation, pp. 49-101. Boulder: Westview Press.
18.
Ikenberry, John G.
, David A. Lake and Michael Mastanduno (1988) `Introduction: Approaches to Explaining American Foreign Policy', International Organization42(1): 1-14.
19.
Keith, Linda Camp
(1999) `The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does it Make a Difference in Human Rights Behavior?', Journal of Peace Research36(1): 95-118.
20.
Keohane, Robert O.
(1995) `Hobbes's Dilemma and Institutional Change in World Politics: Sovereignty in International Society', in Hans-Hendrik Holm and Georg Sörensen (eds) Whose World Order?, pp. 165-186. Boulder: Westview Press.
21.
Kielmansegg, Peter Graf
(1996) `Integration und Demokratie', in Markus Jachtenfuchs and Beate Kohler-Koch (eds) Europäische Integration, pp. 47-71. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
22.
Maluschke, Günther
(1975) `Hegel und das Problem der Staatsräson', in Roman Schnur (ed.) Staatsräson. Studien zur Geschichte eines politischen Begriffs, pp. 569-590. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
23.
Milner, Helen V.
(1997) Interests, Institutions, and Information. Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1993a) `Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach', Journal of Common Market Studies31(4): 473-524.
25.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1993b) `Introduction. Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining', in Peter B. Evans, Harold K. Jacobson and Robert D. Putnam (eds) Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, pp. 3-42. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Münch, Richard
(1998) Globale Dynamik, lokale Lebenswelten. Der schwierige Weg in die Weltgesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
27.
Münkler, Herfried
(1987) Im Namen des Staates. Die Begründung der Staatsraison in der Frühen Neuzeit. Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.
28.
Neyer, Jürgen
(1995) `Globaler Markt und territorialer Staat. Konturen eines wachsenden Antagonismus', Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen2(2): 287-315.
29.
Nitschke, Peter
(1995) Staatsräson kontra Utopie? Von Thomas Müntzer bis zu Friedrich II. von Preußen. Stuttgart: Metzler.
30.
Nordlinger, Eric A.
(1981) On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Offe, Claus
(1975) Bildungsreform. Eine Fallstudie über Reformpolitik. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
32.
Offe, Claus
(1997) `Micro-Aspects of Democratic Theory: What Makes for the Deliberative Competence of Citizens?', in Axel Hadenius (ed.) Democracy's Victory and Crisis: Nobel Symposium No. 93, pp. 81-104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Putnam, Robert
(1988) `Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games', International Organization42(3): 427-460.
34.
`Realism vs Cosmopolitanism'
(1998) `A Debate Between Barry Buzan and David Held. Conducted by Anthony McGrew', Review of International Studies24(3): 387-398.
35.
Reinicke, Wolfgang H.
(1998) Global Public Policy. Governing Without Government?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
36.
Rosas, Allan
(1992) `The Decline of Sovereignty: Legal Perspectives', in Jyrki Iivonen (ed.) The Future of the Nation State in Europe, pp. 130-158. Aldershot: Elgar.
37.
Sandholtz, Wayne
(1993) `Choosing Union: Monetary Politics and Maastricht', International Organization47(1): 1-39.
38.
Scharpf, Fritz W.
(1991) `Die Handlungsfähigkeit des Staates am Ende des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts', Politische Vierteljahresschrift32(4): 621-634.
39.
Schelling, Thomas C.
(1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer
(1997) `Bürgergesellschaftliche Politik — ein Modell der Demokratisierung der Europäischen Union?', in Klaus Dieter Wolf (ed.) Projekt Europa im Übergang? Probleme, Modelle und Strategien des Regierens in der Europäischen Union, pp. 63-89. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
41.
Skidmore, David
and Valerie M. Hudson (eds) (1993a) The Limits of State Autonomy. Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formulation. Boulder: Westview Press.
42.
Skidmore, David
and Valerie M. Hudson (1993b) `Establishing the Limits of State Autonomy: Contending Approaches to the Study of State-Society Relations and Foreign Policy-Making', in David Skidmore and Valerie M. Hudson (eds) The Limits of State Autonomy. Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formulation, pp. 1-22. Boulder: Westview Press.
43.
Skocpol, Theda
(1979) States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Stichweh, Rudolf
(1994) `Nation und Weltgesellschaft', in Bernd Estel and Tilman Mayer (eds) Das Prinzip Nation in modernen Gesellschaften, pp. 83-96. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
45.
Thomson, Janice E.
(1995) `State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research', International Studies Quarterly39(2): 213-233.
46.
Vreeland, James Raymond
(1999) `The IMF: Lender of the Last Resort or Scapegoat?', paper for the International Studies Association Conference, Washington, DC, 16-21 February 1999.
47.
Waltz, Kenneth N.
(1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
48.
Wolf, Klaus Dieter
(ed.) (1997a) Projekt Europa im Übergang? Probleme, Modelle und Strategien des Regierens in der Europäischen Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
49.
Wolf, Klaus Dieter
(1997b) `Entdemokratisierung durch Selbstbindung in der Europäischen Union', in Klaus Dieter Wolf (ed.) Projekt Europa im Übergang? Probleme, Modelle und Strategien des Regierens in der Europäischen Union, pp. 271-294. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
50.
Wolf, Klaus Dieter
(1999) `Defending State Autonomy. Intergovernmental Governance in the European Union', in Beate Kohler-Koch (ed.) The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London: Routledge (forthcoming).
51.
World Society Research Group
(Forschungsgruppe Weltgesellschaft) (1996) `Weltgesellschaft — Identifizierung eines “Phantoms” ', Politische Vierteljahresschrift37(1): 5-26.
52.
Zürn, Michael
(1998) Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
