This article analyses existing assumptions about state identity within contemporary International Relations theory, arguing that the quest for the identity of the state leads to either circularity or regress. Departing from commonsensical criteria of self-identity such as indivisibility, distinctness and spatiotemporal continuity, this article examines how these criteria are interpreted and applied within essentialist, institutionalist, historicist and poststructuralist theories of International Relations, depending on their different background understandings of the relationship between problems of being and problems of knowing. The article ends by suggesting a reconceptualization of the state in terms of proper identity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, G.
(1971) The Essence of Decision. Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.
2.
Aron, R.
(1962) Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
3.
Ashley, R.K.
(1987) `The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics', Alternatives12(4): 403-434.
4.
Ashley, R.K.
(1989) `Living on Border Lines: Man, Poststructuralism, and War', in J. DerDerian and M.J. Shapiro (eds) International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, pp. 259-321. Lexington: Lexington Books.
5.
Ashley, R.K.
(1995) `The Powers of Anarchy: Theory, Sovereignty, and the Domestication of Global Life', in J. Der Derian (ed.) International Theory. Critical Investigations, pp. 94-128. London: Macmillan.
6.
Ashley, R.K.
and R.B.J. Walker (1990) `Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline', International Studies Quarterly34: 367-416.
7.
Badie, B.
(1995) La Fin des territoires. Essai sur le désordre international et sur l'utilité social du respect. Paris: Fayard.
8.
Barkin, S.J.
and B. Cronin (1995) `The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations', International Organization48(1): 107-130.
9.
Bartelson, J.
(1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Bodin, J.
(1962) Six Books of a Commonwealth (edited by K.D. McRae). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Brody, B.A.
(1980) Identity and Essence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12.
Buzan, B.
(1991) People, States, and Fear. An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Harvester.
13.
Buzan, B.
(1993) `From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School', International Organization47(3): 327-352.
14.
Chisholm, R.M.
(1971) `Problems of Identity', in M.K. Munitz (ed.) Identity and Individuation, pp. 3-30. New York: New York University Press.
15.
Cox, R.W.
(1986) `Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory', in R.O. Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and its Critics, pp. 204-254. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
Cox, R.W.
(1989) `Production, the State, and Change in World Order', in E.-O. Czempiel and J.N. Rosenau (eds) Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges. Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s, pp. 37-50. Lexington: Lexington Books.
17.
Derrida, J.
(1992a) `Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority” ', in D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld and D.G. Carlson (eds) Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York and London: Routledge.
18.
Derrida, J.
(1992b) The Other Heading. Reflections on Today's Europe. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
19.
Dessler, D.
(1989) `What's at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?', International Organization43(3): 441-473.
20.
Easton, D.
(1951) The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Knopf.
21.
Fischer, M.
(1992) `Feudal Europe, 800-1300. Communal Discourse and Conflictual Practices', International Organization46(2): 427-466.
22.
Foucault, M.
(1997) `II Faut défendre la société. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil.
23.
Giddens, A.
(1985) The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
Gourevitch, P.
(1978) `The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics', International Organization32(4): 881-911.
25.
Gracia, J.J.E.
(1983) `Individuals as Instances', Review of Metaphysics37(1): 37-59.
Hinsley, F.H.
(1986) Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Hobbes, T.
(1991) Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Hoffman, J.
(1995) Beyond the State. An Introductory Critique. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
Hollis, M.
(1985) `Of Masks and Men', in M. Carrithers, S. Collins and S. Lukes (eds) The Category of the Person. Anthropology, Philosophy, History, pp. 217-233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Hollis, M.
and S. Smith (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32.
Jackson, R.J.
(1987) `Quasi-states, Dual Regimes, and Neoclassical Theory: International Jurisprudence and the Third World', International Organization41(4): 519-549.
33.
James, A.
(1986) Sovereign Statehood. London: Allen and Unwin.
34.
Kelsen, H.
(1969) `Sovereignty and International Law', in W.J. Stankiewicz (ed.) In Defense of Sovereignty, pp. 115-131. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Keohane, R.O.
and J.S. Nye (1977) Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.
36.
Krasner, S.D.
(1989) `Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective', in J.A. Caporaso (ed.) The Elusive State. International and Comparative Perspectives. Newbury Park: Sage.
37.
Kratochwil, F.
(1986) `Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System', World Politics39(1): 27-52.
38.
Mann, M.
(1988) States, War and Capitalism. Studies in Political Sociology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
39.
Mercer, J.
(1995) `Anarchy and Identity', International Organization49(2): 229-252.
40.
Milner, H.
(1992) `The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique', in D.A. Baldwin (ed.) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, pp. 143-169. New York: Columbia University Press.
41.
Morgenthau, H.
(1985) Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.
42.
Nietzsche, F.
(1968) The Will to Power. New York: Vintage Books.
43.
Oksenberg, Rorty A.
(1988) Mind in Action. Essays in the Philosophy of Mind. Boston: Beacon Press.
44.
Østerud, Ø.
(1997) `The Narrow Gate: Entry to the Club of Sovereign States', Review of International Studies23(2): 167-184.
45.
Parekh, B.
(1990) `When Will the State Wither Away?', Alternatives15(3): 247-262.
46.
Ringmar, E.
(1996) `On the Ontological Status of the State', European Journal of International Relations2(4): 439-466.
47.
Rosen, S.
(1989) The Ancients and the Moderns. Rethinking Modernity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
48.
Rosenau, J.
(1990) Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
49.
Ruggie, J.G.
(1986) `Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis', in R.O. Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics, pp. 131-157. New York: Columbia University Press.
50.
Ruggie, J.G.
(1989) `International Structure and International Transformation: Space, Time, and Method,' in E.-O. Czempiel and J.N. Rosenau (eds) Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s, pp. 21-35. Lexington: Lexington Books.
51.
Ruggie, J.G.
(1993) `Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations', International Organization47(1): 139-174.
52.
Runciman, D.
(1997) Pluralism and the Personality of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Searle, J.
(1996) The Construction of Social Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
54.
Siemens, R.L.
(1988) `Hegel and the Law of Identity', Review of Metaphysics42(1): 103-127.
55.
Singer, J.D.
(1961) `The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations', in K. Knorr and S. Verba (eds) The International System: Theoretical Essays, pp. 77-92. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
56.
Sprigge, T.L.S.
(1988) `Personal and Impersonal Identity', Mind47(385): 29-49.
57.
Thomson, J.E.
(1995) `State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Empirical Research', International Studies Quarterly39(2): 213-233.
58.
Tilly, C.
(1990) Coercion, Capital, and European States AD 990-1992. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
59.
Vincent, A.
(1987) Theories of the State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
60.
Vincent, A.
(1989) `Can Groups be Persons?', Review of Metaphysics42(2): 687-715.
61.
Walker, R.B.J.
(1990a) `Security, Sovereignty, and the Challenge of World Politics', Alternatives15(1): 3-27.
62.
Walker, R.B.J.
(1990b) `Sovereignty, Identity, Community: Reflections on the Horizons of Contemporary Political Practice', in R.B.J. Walker and S.H. Mendlovitz (eds) Contending Sovereignties: Redefining Political Community, pp. 159-185. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
63.
Walker, R.B.J.
(1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Walker, R.B.J.
(1995) `From International Relations to World Politics', in J.A. Camilleri, A.P. Jarvis and A.J. Paolini (eds) The State in Transition. Reimagining Political Space, pp. 21-38. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
65.
Waltz, K.N.
(1959) Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.
66.
Wendt, A.
(1987) `The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations', International Organization41(3): 335-370.
67.
Wendt, A.
(1992) `Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics', International Organization46(2): 391-425.
68.
Wendt, A.
(1994) `Collective Identity Formation and the International State', American Political Science Review88(2): 384-396.
69.
Wendt, A.
and R. Duvall (1989) `Institutions and International Order', in E.-O. Czempiel and J.N. Rosenau (eds) Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s, pp. 51-73. Lexington: Lexington Books.
70.
Wiggins, D.
(1971) Identity and Spatio-Temporal Continuity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
71.
Zacher, M.W.
(1992) `The Decaying Pillars of the Westphalian Temple: Implications for International Order and Governance', in J.N. Rosenau and E.-O. Czempiel (eds) Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, pp. 58-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
Zizek, S.
(1991) For They Know Not What They Do. London: Verso.
73.
Zolberg, A.R.
(1981) `Origins of the Modern World System: A Missing Link', World Politics33(2): 253-281.
