The theme of identity has become one of the most important and yet contested elements in contemporary debates over the nature of security and the future of security studies. A key source of this contestation lies in the way that largely unacknowledged claims about knowledge and identity are historically related in one of the most powerful and pervasive conceptions of the relationship between politics and security, which I term the `liberal sensibility'. This foundation, however, has rarely been acknowledged by those who seek to integrate identity concerns into reformulated understandings of security. Contrary to commonly held views, a conception of identity has not been missing from prevailing theories of International Relations. On the contrary, it has been constitutive of them. Grasping the apparent absence of identity concerns as being in fact the outcome of a negative identity practice — a desire to exclude identity concerns from the realms of politics and security — provides a clearer understanding of the structure of the emerging debates between neorealist and critical theories in security studies. It also illustrates how these debates are frequently structured in quite misleading terms, terms that obscure rather than illuminate the fundamental questions raised by the relationship between identity and security.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashcraft, R.
(1985) Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.
Ashley, R.
(1987) `The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics', Alternatives12(4): 403-434.
3.
Baker, H.
(1952) The Wars of Truth: Studies in the Decay of Christian Humanism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Barlow, R.
(1962) Citizenship and Conscience: A Study in the Theory and Practice of Religious Toleration in England During the Eighteenth Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
5.
Bartelson, J.
(1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bauman, Z.
(1989) Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7.
Bellamy, R.
(1992) Liberalism and Modern Society. University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8.
Benhabib, S.
(1992) Situating the Self. New York: Routledge.
9.
Booth, K.
(1991) `Security and Emancipation', Review of International Studies17(4): 123-136.
10.
Booth, K.
(1997) `Discussion: A Reply to Wallace', Review of International Studies23(3): 371-377.
11.
Buzan, B.
and O. Wæver (1997) `Slippery? Contradictory? Sociologically Untenable?: The Copenhagen School Replies', Review of International Studies23(2): 241-250.
12.
Campbell, D.
(1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
Cox, R.W.
(1976) `On Thinking About Future World Order', World Politics28: 175-196.
14.
Der Derian, J.
(1995) `The Value of Security: Hobbes, Marx, Nietzsche, and Baudrillard', in R. Lipschutz (ed.) On Security, pp. 24-45. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
Deudney, D.
(1995) `The Philadelphian System: Sovereignty, Arms Control, and Balance of Power in the American States-union, circa 1787-1861', International Organization49(2): 191-228.
16.
Devetak, R.
(1995) `The Project of Modernity and International Relations Theory', Millennium24(1): 27-51.
17.
Digeser, P.
(1995) Our Politics, Our Selves?: Liberalism, Identity and Harm. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18.
Dillon, M.
(1995) `Security, Philosophy and Politics', in M. Featherstoneet al. (eds) Global Modernities. London: Sage.
19.
Dunn, J.
(1969) The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Dunn, J.
(1990) Interpreting Political Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Foucault, M.
(1979) Discipline and Punish, trans by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.
22.
Foucault, M.
(1980) `Two Lectures', in M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge, edited by Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon.
23.
George, J.
(1994) Discourses of Global Politics. Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner.
24.
George, J.
(1995) `Realist “Ethics”, International Relations, and Post-modernism: Thinking Beyond the Egoism-Anarchy Thematic', Millennium24(2): 195-223.
25.
Hirschman, A.
(1977) The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before its Triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
Hollis, M.
and S. Smith (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon.
27.
Holmes, S.
(1993) The Anatomy of Antiliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Hooykaas, R.
(1972) Religion and the Rise of Modern Science. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
29.
Huysmans, J.
(1995) `Migrants as a Security Problem: Dangers of “Securitizing” Societal Issues', in R. Miles and D. Thranhardt (eds) Migration and European Integration: The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion, pp. 53-72. London: Pinter.
30.
Jepperson, Ronald L.
, Alexander Wendt and P.J. Kotzenstein (1996) `Norms, Identity and Culture in National Security' in P.J. Kotzenstein (ed.) The Culture of National Security, pp. 33-75. New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
Johnston, D.
(1986) The Rhetoric of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes and the Politics of Cultural Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32.
Katzenstein, P.J.
(1996) `Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security' in P.J. Katzenstein (ed.) The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
Katzenstein, P.J.
(ed.) (1996) The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
Kiernan, V.
(1988) The Duel in European History: Honour and the Reign of Aristocracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Klein, B.
(1990) `How the West was Won: Representational Politics of NATO', International Studies Quarterly34: 311-325.
36.
Klein, B.
(1994) Strategic Studies and World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Koselleck, R.
(1988) Critique and Crisis: The Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Oxford: Berg.
38.
Kratochwil, F.
and Ruggie, J. (1986) `International Organization: A State of the Art on the Art of the State', International Organization40: 753-775.
39.
Krause, K.
and Williams, M.C. (1996) `Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies?: Politics and Methods', Mershon International Studies Review40: 229-254.
40.
Lapid, Y.
(1996) `Culture's Ship: Returns and Departures in International Relations Theory' in Y. Lapid and F. Kratochwil (eds) The Return of Culture and Identity in International Relations Theory pp. 13-20. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
41.
Lapid, Y.
and F. Kratochwil (1996) `Revisiting the “National”: Toward an Identity Agenda in Neorealism', in Y. Lapid and F. Kratochwil (eds) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, pp. 105-126. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
42.
Latham, R.
(1995) `Liberalism's Order/Liberalism's Other: A Genealogy of Threat', Alternatives20: 111-146.
43.
Latham, R.
(1996) `Getting Out From Under: Rethinking Security Beyond Liberalism and the Levels-of-Analysis Problem', Millennium25(1): 77-108.
44.
Locke, J.
(1980) Two Treatises of Government. Indianapolis: Hackett.
45.
McSweeny, B.
(1996) `Identity and Security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School', Review of International Studies22(1): 81-93.
46.
Mearsheimer, J.
(1994/95) `The False Promise of International Institutions', International Security19(3): 5-49.
47.
Mearsheimer, J.
(1995) `A Realist Reply', International Security20(1): 82-93.
48.
Mercer, J.
(1995) `Identity and Anarchy', International Organization49(2): 229-252.
49.
Neufeld, M.
(1993) `Interpretation and the “Science” of International Relations', Review of International Studies19: 39-62.
50.
Neufeld, M.
(1995) The Restructuring of International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Neumann, I.
(1996) `Collective Identity Formation: Self and Other in International Relations', European Journal of International Relations2(2): 139-174.
52.
Oestreich, G.
(1982) Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Pateman, C.
(1988) The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
54.
Pick, D.
(1993) War Machine: The Rationalization of Slaughter in the Modern Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.
55.
Pocock, J.G.A.
(1985) Virtue, Commerce, History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Posen, B.
(1993) `Nationalism, the Mass Army and Military Power', International Security18: 80-124.
57.
Price, R.
(1994) `Interpretation and Disciplinary Orthodoxy in International Relations', Review of International Studies20(2): 201-204.
58.
Rabb, T.
(1975) The Struggle for Stability in Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
Rengger, N.
(1995) Political Theory, Modernity and Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
60.
Rorty, R.
(1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
61.
Rosenblum, N.
(1987) Another Liberalism: Romanticism and the Reconstruction of Liberal Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
Sandel, M.
(1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Saurette, P.
(1996) ` “I Mistrust All Systematizers and Avoid Them”: Nietzsche, Arendt and the Crisis of the Will to Order in International Relations Theory', Millennium25(1): 1-28.
64.
Shapin, S.
(1995) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
Sjolander, C.T.
and W.S. Cox (eds) (1994) Beyond Positivism: Critical Reflections on International Relations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
66.
Shklar, J.
(1989) `The Liberalism of Fear', in N. Rosenblum (ed.) Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
Toulmin, S.
(1990) Cosmopolis: the Hidden Agenda of Modernity. New York: Free Press.
68.
Touraine, A.
(1995) Critique of Modernity, trans by D. Macey. Oxford: Blackwell.
69.
Tuck, R.
(1989) Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70.
Tully, J.
(1993) An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
Van Evera, S.
(1994) `Hypotheses on Nationalism and War', International Security18: 5-39.
72.
Wæver, O.
, B. Buzan, M. Kelstrup and P. Lematire (1993) Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. London: Pinter.
73.
Wallace, W.
(1996) `Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats: Theory and Practice in International Relations', Review of International Studies22(3): 301-321.
74.
Walker, R.B.J.
(1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75.
Walker, R.B.J.
(1997) `The Subject of Security', in K. Krause and M.C. Williams (eds) Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
76.
Weldes, J.
(1996) `Constructing National Interests', European Journal of International Relations, 2(3): 275-318.
77.
Wendt, A.
(1992) `Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics', International Organization46: 391-425.
78.
Wendt, A.
(1994) `Collective Identity Formation and the International State', American Political Science Review88(2): 384-396.
79.
Wendt, A.
(1995) `Constructing International Politics', International Security20(1): 71-81.
80.
Williams, M.C.
(1996) `Hobbes and International Relations: a Reconsideration', International Organization50(2): 213-236.
