Scholars and practitioners often argue that the United States’ identity as a democracy contributes to the effectiveness and endurance of US military alliances. One way to test this claim is to ask: what would happen if citizens of allied countries came to perceive US democracy as severely flawed or diminished? In the context of now well-documented Russian interference in recent US elections, we examine whether Russia’s election interference and its perceived impact on American democracy damage foreign public opinion about the United States. The results of our survey experiment fielded in Japan suggest that information about successful Russian election interference—that is, interference that had an impact on the election outcome—reduces foreign citizens’ faith in the United States as an ally. This pattern most clearly manifests in reduced belief in the US capacity to defend Japan. Our study sheds light on the connections between the image of the United States, both as a trustworthy and effective state, and the foreign public’s attitudes toward US alliances, with theoretical and practical implications.
AgadjanianAHoriuchiY (2020) Has Trump damaged the U.S. image abroad? Decomposing the effects of policy messages on foreign public opinion. Political Behavior42(2): 581–602.
2.
AuerswaldDPSaidemanSM (2014) NATO in Afghanistan: Fighting Together, Fighting Alone. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BalmasM (2018) Tell me who is your leader, and I will tell you who you are: foreign leaders’ perceived personality and public attitudes toward their countries and citizenry. American Journal of Political Science62(2): 499–514.
4.
BeckleyMHoriuchiYMillerJM (2018) America’s role in the making of Japan’s economic miracle. Journal of East Asian Studies18(1): 1–21.
5.
ChuJAKoJLiuA (2021) Commanding support: values and interests in the rhetoric of alliance politics. International Interactions47(3): 477–503.
6.
ClareJ (2013) The deterrent value of democratic allies. International Studies Quarterly57(3): 545–555.
7.
ConradJ (2017) How democratic alliances solve the power parity problem. British Journal of Political Science47(4): 893–913.
8.
DigiuseppeMPoastP (2018) Arms versus democratic allies. British Journal of Political Science48(4): 981–1003.
9.
DragojlovicNI (2013) Leaders without borders: familiarity as a moderator of transnational source cue Effects. Political Communication30(2): 297–316.
10.
EichenbergRC (1989) Public Opinion and National Security in Western Europe. Consensus Lost?London: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
EichenbergRCStollR (2003) Representing defense: democratic control of the defense budget in the United States and Western Europe. Journal of Conflict Resolution47(4): 399–422.
12.
GaubatzKT (1996) Democratic states and commitment in international relations. International Organization50(1): 109–139.
13.
GerberASGreenDP (2012) Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W.W. Norton.
14.
GiblerDM (2009) International Military Alliances, 1648–2008. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
15.
GiblerDMWolfordS (2006) Alliances, then democracy: an examination of the relationship between regime type and alliance formation. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(1): 129–153.
16.
GoldmanASchmidtMSFandosN (2019) F.B.I. opened inquiry into whether Trump was secretly working on behalf of Russia. The New York Times, 19January. Available at: https://nyti.ms/2RH4nD4 (accessed 13 June 2022).
17.
GoldsmithBEHoriuchiY (2009) Spinning the globe? U.S. public diplomacy and foreign public opinion. The Journal of Politics71(3): 863–875.
18.
GoldsmithBEHoriuchiY (2012) In search of soft power: does foreign public opinion matter for US foreign policy?World Politics64(3): 555–585.
19.
GoldsmithBEHoriuchiYInoguchiT (2005) American foreign policy and global opinion: who supported the war in Afghanistan?Journal of Conflict Resolution49(3): 408–429.
20.
GoldsmithBEHoriuchiYMatushK (2021) Does public diplomacy sway foreign public opinion? Identifying the effect of high-level visits. American Political Science Review115(4):1342–1357.
21.
GoldsmithBEHoriuchiYWoodT (2014) Doing well by doing good: the impact of foreign aid on foreign public opinion. Quarterly Journal of Political Science9(1): 87–114.
22.
GreenMSzechenyiN (2006) Common values: a new agenda for U.S. Japan relations. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs7(2): 47–55.
23.
HikotaniTHoriuchiYTagoA (2022) Revisiting negative externalities of US military bases: the case of Okinawa. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. Epub ahead of print 6 April. DOI: 10.1093/irap/lcac002/6564247.
24.
HofmannSCYeoAI (2015) Business as usual: the role of norms in alliance management. European Journal of International Relations21(2): 377–401.
25.
HolstiOR (2008) To See Ourselves as Others See Us: How Publics Abroad View the United States after 9/11. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
26.
HoriuchiYImaiKTaniguchiN (2007) Designing and analyzing randomized experiments: application to a Japanese election survey experiment. American Journal of Political Science51(3): 669–687.
27.
HuthPK (1999) Deterrence and international conflict: empirical findings and theoretical debates. Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 25–48.
28.
IserniaPJuhaszZRattingerH (2002) Foreign policy and the rational public in comparative perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution46(2): 201–224.
29.
IshibashiN (2007) The dispatch of Japan’s self-defense forces to Iraq: public opinion, elections, and foreign policy. Asian Survey47(5): 766–789.
30.
KaneJVBarabasJ (2019) No harm in checking: using factual manipulation checks to assess attentiveness in experiments. American Journal of Political Science63(1): 234–249.
31.
KatzensteinPJKeohaneRO (eds) (2007) Anti-Americanisms in World Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
KimJYLiWLeeS (2021) Making sense of Japan’s export restrictions against South Korea: domestic symbolism, empowered premiership, and Anti-Korean sentiment. Asian Survey61(4): 683–710.
33.
KostadinovaT (2000) East European public support for NATO membership: fears and aspirations. Journal of Peace Research37(2): 235–249.
34.
LaiBReiterD (2000) Democracy, political similarity, and international alliances, 1816–1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution44(2): 203–227.
35.
LakeDA (2018) International legitimacy lost? Rule and resistance when America is first. Perspectives on Politics16(1): 6–21.
36.
LeedsBA (2003) Alliance reliability in times of war: explaining state decisions to violate treaties. International Organization57(4): 801–827.
37.
LevinDH (2020) Meddling in the Ballot Box: The Causes and Effects of Partisan Electoral Interventions. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
LevitskySZiblattD (2018) How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing.
39.
MarshallMGGurrTRJaggersK (2019) Polity IV project, political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2018. Available at: https://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html (accessed 7 January 2020).
40.
MatushKS (2018) Going Public Abroad: When and Why Leaders Address Foreign Publics. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA.
41.
MillerJM (2019) Cold War Democracy: The United States and Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
MorrowJD (1994) Alliances, credibility, and peacetime costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution38(2): 270–297.
44.
MorrowJD (2000) Alliances: why write them down?Annual Review of Political Science3(1): 63–83.
45.
MounkY (2018) The People Vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
NakashimaE (2019) U.S. cybercom contemplates information warfare to counter Russian interference in 2020 election. The Washington Post, 25December. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/2ubt4eum (last accessed on July 16, 2022).
47.
NyeJS (1990) Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.
48.
NyeJS (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
49.
PageBIBarabasJ (2000) Foreign policy gaps between citizens and leaders. International Studies Quarterly44(3): 339–364.
50.
PilsterU (2011) Are democracies the better allies? The impact of regime type on military coalition operations. International Interactions37(1): 55–85.
51.
PosardMNKepeMReiningerH, et al. (2020) From Consensus to Conflict: Understanding Foreign Measures Targeting U.S. Elections. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
52.
PrzeworskiA (2019) Crises of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
ReedW (1997) Alliance duration and democracy: an extension and cross-validation of “democratic states and commitment in international relations.”American Journal of Political Science41(3): 1072–1078.
54.
ReiterD (2003) Exploring the bargaining model of war. Perspectives on Politics1(1): 27–43.
55.
SaidemanSMAuerswaldDP (2012) Comparing caveats: understanding the sources of national restrictions upon NATO’s mission in Afghanistan. International Studies Quarterly56(1): 67–84.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (2019) Military expenditure by country, in constant US$. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex (accessed 16 July 2022).
TomzMWeeksJLP (2020) Public opinion and foreign electoral intervention. American Political Science Review114(3): 856–873.
60.
U.S. Department of State, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs (2020) U.S. relations with Japan, bilateral relations fact sheet. Available at: https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-japan/ (accessed 16 July 2022).
61.
WaltSM (1997) Why alliances endure or collapse. Survival39(1): 156–179.
62.
WaltSM (2005) Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy. New York: W.W. Norton.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
