International Relations scholars have long recognized the need to study the complex interdependencies of the international economy in order to understand the economic sources of national power and influence. Renewed interest in the patterns of international economic interdependencies and the structure of globalization has led scholars to a better, more empirically grounded understanding of the significance of complex interdependence for the evolution of international power. This paper examines the effect of one important and persistent characteristic of complex interdependence, American centrality within the international banking system, and argues that changes in the US financial cycle drive international financial volatility and crisis. These dynamics comprise the underbelly of American financial hegemony and pose a fundamental challenge to US leadership in the contemporary liberal international order. Financial stability is key to economic growth, which in turn perpetuates liberal political norms and institutions. Financial instability, on the other hand, breeds political discontent, which may take the form of populism or nationalism. The ability and willingness of the United States to reign in its own financial system may be key to ensuring that the liberal international system it established 75 years ago survives and thrives in the coming decades.
AdrianTShinHS (2010) Liquidity and leverage. Journal of Financial Intermediation19(3): 418–437.
2.
AhlquistJCopelovitchMWalterS (2020) The political consequences of external economic shocks: evidence from Poland. American Journal of Political Science 64(4): 904–920.
3.
AmadorJCabralS (2017) Networks of value-added trade. The World Economy40(7): 1291–1313.
4.
AngkinandAP (2009) Banking regulation and the output cost of banking crises. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money19(2): 240–257.
5.
AshrafBN (2017) Political institutions and bank risk-taking behavior. Journal of Financial Stability29: 13–35.
6.
AvdjievSHardyBKalemli-ÖzcenS, et al. (2018) Gross Capital Flows by Banks, Corporates, and Sovereigns. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.
7.
BaH (2018) The systemic causes of financial crises in the long nineteenth century. Business and Politics20(2): 208–238.
8.
Bauerle DanzmanSWinecoffWKOatleyT (2017) All crises are global: capital cycles in an imbalanced international political economy. International Studies Quarterly61(4): 907–923.
9.
BernhardWLeblangD (2002) Political parties and monetary commitments. International Organization56(4): 803–830.
10.
BernhardWBrozJLClarkWR (2002) The political economy of monetary institutions. International Organization56(4): 693–723.
11.
BorioC (2014) The financial cycle and macroeconomics: what have we learnt?Journal of Banking & Finance45: 182–198.
12.
BorioCDisyatatP (2010) Global imbalances and the financial crisis: reassessing the role of international finance. Asian Economic Policy Review5(2): 198–216.
13.
BrancatiD (2019) Global elections database. Data retrieved from World Development Indicators, Available at: http://www.globalelectionsdatabase.com/ (accessed 9/1/2019).
14.
BronerFDidierTErceA, et al. (2011) Gross Capital flows: Dynamics and Crises. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.
15.
BrozJL (2002) Political system transparency and monetary commitment regimes. International Organization56(4): 861–887.
16.
BrunoVShinHS (2014) Cross-border banking and global liquidity. The Review of Economic Studies82(2): 535–564.
17.
BrunoVShinHS (2015) Capital flows and the risk-taking channel of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics71: 119–132.
18.
CaballeroJ (2015) Banking crises and financial integration: insights from networks science. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money34: 127–146.
19.
CalderonCKubotaM (2012) Gross inflows gone wild: gross capital inflows, credit booms and crises. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.
20.
CalvoGA (1998) Capital flows and capital-market crises: the simple economics of sudden stops. Journal of Applied Economics1(1): 35–54.
21.
CalvoGAIzquierdoAMejiaLF (2004) On the empirics of sudden stops: the relevance of balance-sheet effects. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10520.
22.
CeruttiEClaessensSRoseAK (2017) How important is the global financial cycle. Evidence from Capital Flows. CEPR Discussion Papers 12075.
23.
ChinnMDItoH (2008) A new measure of financial openness. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis10(3): 309–322.
24.
CihakMDemirgüç-KuntAFeyenE, et al. (2012) Benchmarking financial systems around the world. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.
25.
ClaessensSKoseMATerronesME (2011, May). Financial cycles: what? how? when?. In: International Seminar on Macroeconomics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 303–344
26.
ClaessensSKoseMATerronesME (2012) How do business and financial cycles interact?Journal of International Economics87(1): 178–190.
27.
ClarkTSLinzerDA (2015) Should i use fixed or random effects?Political Science Research and Methods3(2): 399–408.
28.
ContessiSDe PacePFrancisJL (2013) The cyclical properties of disaggregated capital flows. Journal of International Money and Finance32: 528–555.
29.
CruzCKeeferPScartasciniC (2016) Database of Political Institutions 2015: Codebook. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
30.
DespresEKindlebergerCPSalantWS (1966) The Dollar and World Liquidity: A Minority View. Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution.
31.
DrehmannMBorioCETsatsaronisK (2012) Characterising the financial cycle: don’t lose sight of the medium term! BIS Working Paper.
32.
FahlenbrachRStulzRM (2011) Bank CEO incentives and the credit crisis. Journal of Financial Economics99(1): 11–26.
33.
FarrellHNewmanA (2019) Weaponized interdependence. International Security44(1): 42–79.
34.
FichtnerJ (2017) Perpetual decline or persistent dominance? Uncovering Anglo-America’s true structural power in global finance. Review of International Studies43(1): 3–28.
35.
ForbesKJRigobonR (2002) No contagion, only interdependence: measuring stock market comovements. The Journal of Finance57(5): 2223–2261.
36.
ForbesKJWarnockFE (2012) Capital flow waves: surges, stops, flight, and retrenchment. Journal of International Economics88(2): 235–251.
37.
FriedmanBM (2006) The moral consequences of economic growth. Society43(2): 15–22.
38.
GarrattRMahadevaLSvirydzenkaK (2011) Mapping systemic risk in the international banking network. The Bank of England.
39.
GarrigaAC (2016) Central bank independence in the world: a new data set. International Interactions42(5): 849–868.
40.
GoldsteinIPauznerA (2005) Demand–deposit contracts and the probability of bank runs. Journal of Finance60(3): 1293–1327.
41.
GoldsteinMV’eronN (2011) Too big to fail: the transatlantic debate. Peterson Institute for International Economics. Working Paper No. 11-2.
42.
GourinchasPOObstfeldM (2012) Stories of the twentieth century for the twenty-first. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics4(1): 226–265.
43.
GourinchasPOReyHGovillotN, et al. (2010) Exorbitant privilege and exorbitant duty. Technical report, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan.
44.
HallerbergM (2002) Veto players and the choice of monetary institutions. International Organization56(4): 775–802.
45.
HelleinerE (1994) The world of money: the political economy of international capital mobility. Policy Sciences27(4): 295–298.
46.
IkenberryGJ (2011) Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order, vol. 128. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
JordàÒSchularickMTaylorAM (2011) Financial crises, credit booms, and external imbalances: 140 years of lessons. IMF Economic Review59(2): 340–378.
48.
KeeferP (1999) When do special interests run rampant? Disentangling the role of elections, incomplete information and checks and balances in banking crises. Disentangling the Role of Elections, Incomplete Information and Checks and Balances in Banking Crises (November 30, 1999). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2543.
49.
KeohaneRONyeJS (1977) Power and Interdependence. Boston, MA, USA: Little, Brown and Company.
50.
KindelbergerCPAliberRZ (2005) Manias, Panics and Crashes: A History of Financial Crisis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
51.
KoepkeR (2019) What drives capital flows to emerging markets? A survey of the empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys33(2): 516–540.
52.
LaevenLValenciaF (2012) Systemic banking crises database: An update. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.
53.
LanePRMcQuadeP (2014) Domestic credit growth and international capital flows. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics116(1): 218–252.
54.
LanePRMilesi-FerrettiGM (2011) The cross-country incidence of the global crisis. IMF Economic Review59(1): 77–110.
55.
LanePRMilesi-FerrettiGM (2012) External adjustment and the global crisis. Journal of International Economics88(2): 252–265.
56.
LayneC (2012) This time it’s real: the end of unipolarity and the Pax Americana. International Studies Quarterly56(1): 203–213.
57.
LiuWMNgoPT (2014) Elections, political competition and bank failure. Journal of Financial Economics112(2): 251–268.
58.
MarshallMGGurrTRJaggersK (2014) Polity iv project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2013. Center for Systemic Peace.
59.
Milesi-FerrettiMGMTamirisaMNTStrobbeMF (2010) Bilateral Financial Linkages and Global Imbalances: A View on the Eve of the Financial Crisis. 10-257. International Monetary Fund.
60.
MinskyHP (1977) The financial instability hypothesis: an interpretation of Keynes and an alternative to standard theory. Challenge20(1): 20–27.
61.
NyeJS (2017) The kindleberger trap. Project Syndicate, June9.
62.
NyeJSJr (2010) The futures of American power-dominance and decline in perspective. Foreign Affairs89: 2.
63.
NyeJSJr (2015) Is the American Century Over?John Wiley & Sons.
64.
OatleyT (2015) A Political Economy of American Hegemony. Cambridge University Press.
65.
OatleyT (2019) Toward a political economy of complex interdependence. European Journal of International Relations25(4): 957–978.
66.
OatleyTWinecoffWKPennockA, et al. (2013) The political economy of global finance: A network model. Perspectives on Politics11(1): 133–153.
67.
ObstfeldM (2012) Financial flows, financial crises, and global imbalances. Journal of International Money and Finance31(3): 469–480.
68.
OyeKA (1979) Eagle Entangled:US Foreign Policy in a Complex World. Longman.
69.
ReinhartCMReinhartVR (2008) Capital flow bonanzas: an encompassing view of the past and present. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
70.
ReinhartCMRogoffKS (2009) This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton university press.
71.
RochetJC (2009) Why are There so Many Banking Crises? The Politics and Policy of Bank Regulation. Princeton University Press.
72.
RosecranceR (1976) America as an ordinary power. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.
73.
SaundersAStrockETravlosNG (1990) Ownership structure, deregulation, and bank risk taking. the Journal of Finance45(2): 643–654.
74.
SchularickMTaylorAM (2012) Credit booms gone bust: monetary policy, leverage cycles, and financial crises, 1870-2008. American Economic Review102(2): 1029–61.
75.
StasavageD (2003) Transparency, democratic accountability, and the economic consequences of monetary institutions. American Journal of Political Science47(3): 389–402.
76.
StrohsalTProañoCRWoltersJ (2019) Assessing the cross-country interaction of financial cycles: evidence from a multivariate spectral analysis of the USA and the UK. Empirical Economics57(2): 385–398.
77.
TaylorJB (2013) Getting off Track: How Government Actions and Interventions Caused, Prolonged, and Worsened the Financial crisis. Hoover Press.
78.
WebbMCKrasnerSD (1989) Hegemonic stability theory: an empirical assessment. Review of International Studies15(2): 183–198.
79.
WinecoffWK (2015) Structural power and the global financial crisis: a network analytical approach. Business and Politics17(3): 495–525.
80.
WinecoffWK (2017) How did American international political economy become reductionist? A historiography of a discipline. In: Thompson WR (ed) Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
81.
WinecoffWK (2020) The persistent myth of lost hegemony revisited: Structural power as a complex network phenomenon. The European Journal of International Relations 26(S1): 209–252.
82.
ZhongWAnHFangW, et al. (2016) Features and evolution of international fossil fuel trade network based on value of energy. Applied Energy165: 868–877.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
