Bringing together psychological approaches to empathy with research on public preferences for foreign development aid, we shed light on the role empathy plays in global helping behavior. We argue individuals combine their affective empathic responses with situational factors when forming foreign aid preferences. Testing our theory with two novel experiments embedded in a national survey of US citizens, we find that affective empathy not only predicts the individual variation in foreign aid preferences but also explains why Americans weigh aid effectiveness and recipient deservingness—the two important situational aspects of foreign aid—differently. We show that the ability to feel others’ pain is what facilitates global helping behavior, not simply knowing their pain. However, even though this affective ability moderates the impact of aid effectiveness, it amplifies that of recipient merit. Our results contribute to a richer understanding of when empathy facilitates public support for foreign development aid and add to the burgeoning research program on behavioral international politics.
AarøeLPetersenMB (2014) Crowding out culture: scandinavians and Americans agree on social welfare in the face of deservingness cues. Journal of Politics76(3): 684–697.
ArcherRLDiaz-LovingRGollwitzerPM, et al. (1981) The role of dispositional empathy and social evaluation in the empathic mediation of helping. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology40(4): 786–796.
4.
BatsonCD (2011) Altruism in Humans. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BatsonCDBatsonJGSlingsbyJK, et al. (1991) Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology61(3): 413–426.
6.
BauerPT (1993) Development Aid: End It Or Mend It. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
7.
BauhrMCharronNNasiritousiN (2013) Does corruption cause aid fatigue? Public opinion and the aid-corruption paradox. International Studies Quarterly57(3): 568–579.
8.
BayramAB (2017a) Aiding strangers: generalized trust and the moral basis of public support for foreign development aid. Foreign Policy Analysis13(1): 133–153.
9.
BayramAB (2017b) Due deference: cosmopolitan social identity and the psychology of legal obligation. Internatioanl Organization71(S1): S137–S163.
10.
BayramABGrahamER (2017) Financing the United Nations: explaining variation in how donors provide funding to the UN. The Review of International Organizations12(3): 421–459.
11.
BayramABThompsonC (2019) Populist rhetoric and foreign aid preferences. Working Paper. University of Arkansas.
12.
BerinskyAJHuberGALenzGS (2012) Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis20(3): 351–368.
13.
BerthélemyJC (2006) Bilateral donors’ interest vs. recipients’ development motives in aid allocation: do all donors behave the same?Review of Development Economics10(2): 179–194.
14.
BirdsallNSavedoffWDVybornyK (2008) Progress-Based Aid for Education: A Hands-Off Approach. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
15.
BlairT (2013) Pain, passion and empathy – what I’ve learned about peacemaking. The Guardian.
16.
BloomP (2016) Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. New York: HarperCollins.
17.
BodensteinTFaustJ (2017) Who cares? European public opinion on foreign aid and political conditionality. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies55(5): 955–973.
18.
BooneP (1996) Politics and the effectiveness of foreign aid. European Economic Review40(2): 289–329.
19.
BoothKWheelerN (2007) The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics. Houndmills, Baskingstoke, Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
BrockLGeisAMüllerH (2006) The case for a new research agenda: explaining democratic wars. In: Democratic Wars. Houndmills, Baskingstoke, Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan, 195–214.
21.
BuchBBuntaineMTParksBC (2015) Aiming at the wrong targets: the difficulty of improving domestic institutions with international aid. AidData (January): 1–40. Working paper.
22.
BuhrmesterMKwangTGoslingSD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high quality data?Perpectives on Psychological Science6(1): 3–5.
23.
BurnsideCDollarD (2000) Aid, policies, and growth. American Economic Review90(4): 847–868.
24.
BurnsteinECrandallCKitayamaS (1994) Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology67(5): 773–789.
25.
CameronCDPayneBK (2011) Escaping affect: how motivated emotion regulation creates insensitivity to mass suffering. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology100(1): 1–15.
26.
CheneryHBStroutAM (1966) Foreign assistance and economic development. American Economic Review56(September): 679–733.
27.
Christov-MooreLIacoboniM (2016) Self-other resonance, its control and prosocial inclinations: brain–behavior relationships. Human Brain Mapping37(4): 1544–1558.
28.
ClemensMAKennyCJMossTJ (2007) The trouble with the MDGs: confronting expectations of aid and development success. World Development35(5): 735–751.
29.
CollierP (2007) The Bottom Billion. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
CollierPDehnJ (2001) Aid, Shocks, and Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
31.
CollierPGuillaumontPGuillaumontS, et al. (1997) Redesigning conditionality. World Development25(9): 1399–1407.
32.
ConnollyEDoyleJDwyerF (2008) Public opinion and development issues: a survey of Irish university student opinions. Irish Studies in International Affairs (19): 209–226.
33.
CrawfordNC (2000) The passion of world politics: propositions on emotion and emotional relationships. International Security24(4, Spring): 116–156.
34.
DalgaardCJHansenHTarpF (2004) On the empirics of foreign aid and growth. The Economic Journal114(496): 191–216.
35.
DavisM (1994) Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Madison: Brown and Benchmark.
36.
DecetyJYoderKJ (2016) Empathy and motivation for justice: cognitive empathy and concern, but not emotional empathy, predict sensitivity to injustice for others. Social Neuroscience11(1): 1–14.
37.
De WaalFBM (2008) Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology59(1): 279–300.
38.
DietrichS (2013) Bypass or engage? Explaining donor delivery tactics in foreign aid allocation. International Studies Quarterly57(4): 698–712.
39.
DollarDLevinV (2006) The increasing selectivity of foreign aid, 1984–2003. World Development34(12): 2034–2046.
40.
DuttaNLeesonPTWilliamsonCR (2013) The amplification effect: foreign aid’s impact on political institutions. Kyklos 66(2): 208–228.
41.
EasterlyWR (2001) The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
EasterlyWPfutzeT (2008) Where does the money go? Best and worst practices in foreign aid. Journal of Economic Perspectives22(2): 29–52.
43.
EdeleADziobekIKellerM (2013) Explaining altruistic sharing in the dictator game: the role of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and justice sensitivity. Learning and Individual Differences24(April): 96–103.
44.
FeldmanSSteenbergenMR (2001) The humanitarian foundation of public support for social welfare. American Journal of Political Science45(3): 658–677.
45.
FongCM (2007) Evidence from an experiment on charity to welfare recipients: reciprocity, altruism and the empathic responsiveness hypothesis. Economic Journal117(522): 1008–1024.
46.
GilensM (2001) Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review95(2): 379–396.
HackerJS (2002) The Divided Welfare State: The Battle Over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. Cambrdige, MA: Cambrdige University Press.
49.
Hafner-BurtonEMHaggardSLakeDA, et al. (2017) The behavioral revolution and international relations. International Organization71(1): 1–31.
50.
HallTYarhi-MiloK (2012) The personal touch: leaders’ impressions, costly signaling, and assessments of sincerity in international affairs. International Studies Quarterly56(3): 560–573.
51.
HansenKJ (2019) Who cares if they need help? The deservingness heuristic, humanitarianism, and welfare opinions. Political Psychology40(2): 413–430.
52.
HansenHTarpF (2001) Aid and growth regressions. Journal of Development Economics64(2): 547–570.
53.
HeadN (2012) Transforming conflict: trust, empathy, and dialogue. International Journal of Peace Studies17(2): 33–55.
54.
HeinrichT (2013) When is foreign aid selfish, when is it selfless?Journal of Politics75(2): 422–435.
55.
HeinrichTKobayashiY (2018) How do people evaluate foreign aid to ‘nasty’ regimes?British Journal of Political Science. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000503.
56.
HeinrichTKobayashiYBryantKA (2016) Public opinion and foreign aid cuts in economic crises. World Development77(January): 66–79.
57.
HetlingAMcDermottMLMappsM (2008) Symbolism versus policy learning: public opinion of the 1996 US welfare reforms. American Politics Research36(3): 335–357.
58.
HodlerRRaschkyPA (2014) Regional favoritism. Quarterly Journal of Economics129(2): 995–1033.
59.
HolmesM (2018) Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Social Neuroscience and International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
HolmesMYarhi-MiloK (2017) The psychological logic of peace summits: how empathy shapes outcomes of diplomatic negotiations. International Studies Quarterly61(1): 107–122.
61.
HuddyLJonesJMChardRE (2001) Compassionate politics: support for old-age programs among the non elderly. Political Psychology22(3): 443–471.
62.
HudsonDvanHeerde-HudsonJ (2012) ‘A mile wide and an inch deep’: surveys of public attitudes towards development aid. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning4(1): 5–23.
63.
HurstRTidwellTHawkinsD (2017) Down the rathole? Public support for US foreign aid. International Studies Quarterly61(2): 442–454.
64.
IckesW (2001) Measuring empathic accuracy. In: HallJBernieriF (eds) Interpersonal Sensitivity: Theory and Measurement. Manhwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 219–241.
65.
JensenT (2014) Welfare commonsense, poverty porn and doxosophy. Sociological Research Online19(3): 1–7.
66.
JensenCPetersenMB (2017) The deservingness heuristic and the politics of health care. American Journal of Political Science61(1): 68–83.
KillickTGunatilakaRMarrA (1998) Aid and the Political Economy of Policy Change. London, UK: Routledge.
69.
KlimeckiOMayerSJusyteA, et al. (2016) Empathy promotes altruistic behavior in economic interactions. Scientific Reports6: 31961. doi:10.1038/srep31961.
70.
KnackSEubankN (2009) Aid and trust in country systems. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
71.
KomiyaYMiyagawaMTagoA (2018) Public opinion and foreign policy: the effect of information stimulus on levels of support for foreign aid and coalition withdrawal. Emerging Risks in a World of Heterogeneity. New York: Springer, 135–155.
72.
KoschutS (2014) Emotional (security) communities: the significance of emotion norms in inter-allied conflict management. Review of International Studies40(3): 533–558.
73.
LammCSilaniG (2014) Insights into collective emotions from the social neuroscience of empathy. In: von ScheveCSalmelaM (eds) Collective Emotions: Perspectives from Psychology, Philosophy, and Sociology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 63–77.
74.
Leach-KemonKChouDPSchneiderMT, et al. (2011) The global financial crisis has led to a slowdown in growth of funding to improve health in many developing countries. Health Affairs31(1): 228–235.
75.
LevyV (1988) Aid and growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: the recent experience. European Economic Review32(9): 1777–1795.
76.
MadhavanGOakleyB (2011) Too much of a good thing? Foreign aid and pathological altruism. In: Pathological Altruism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 237–244.
77.
MercerJ (2010) Emotional beliefs. International Organization64(1): 1–31.
78.
MilnerHVTingleyDH (2010) The political economy of U.S. foreign aid: American legislators and the domestic politics of aid. Economics & Politics22(2): 200–232.
79.
MilnerHVTingleyDH (2011) Who supports global economic engagement? The sources of preferences in American foreign economic policy. International Organization65(1): 37–68.
80.
MilnerHVTingleyDH (2013) Public opinion and foreign aid: a review essay. International Interactions39(3): 389–401.
81.
MosleyP (1980) Aid, savings and growth revisited. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics42(2): 79–95.
82.
MosleyP (1985) The political economy of foreign aid: a model of the market for a public good. Economic Development and Cultural Change33(2): 373–393.
83.
MullinixKJLeeperTJDruckmanJN, et al. (2015) The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science2(2): 109–138.
84.
NewmanBJHartmanTKLownPL, et al. (2015) Easing the heavy hand: Humanitarian concern, empathy, and opinion on immigration. British Journal of Political Science45(3): 583–607.
85.
NoélAThérienJP (2002) Public opinion and global justice. Comparative Political Studies35(6): 631–656.
86.
PaxtonPKnackS (2012) Individual and country-level factors affecting support for foreign aid. International Political Science Review33(2): 171–192.
87.
PetersenMB (2012) Social welfare as small-scale help: evolutionary psychology and the deservingness heuristic. American Journal of Political Science56(1): 1–16.
88.
PetersenMBSlothuusRStubagerR, et al. (2011) Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: the automaticity of the deservingness heuristic. European Journal of Political Research50(1): 24–25.
89.
PetersenMBSznycerDCosmidesL, et al. (2012) Who deserves help? Evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion about welfare. Political Psychology33(3): 395–418.
90.
PierceJRKilduffGJGalinskyAD, et al. (2013) From glue to gasoline: how competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psychological Science24(10): 1986–1994.
91.
PomerantzPR (2004) Aid Effectiveness in Africa: Developing Trust Between Donors and Governments. Oxford, UK: Lexington Books.
92.
PowersRMLeblangDATierneyM J (2010) Overseas economic aid or domestic electoral assistance: the political economy of foreign aid voting in the US Congress. Working paper.
PrestonSDDe WaalFBM (2002) Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences25(1): 1–71.
95.
RathbunBCKertzerJDParadisM (2017) Homo diplomaticus: mixed-method evidence of variation in strategic rationality. International Organization71(1): 33–60.
96.
Reus-SmitC (2014) Emotions and the social. International Theory6(3): 568–574.
97.
RiddellRC (2008) Does Foreign Aid Really Work?Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
98.
RoodmanD (2007) Macro aid effectiveness research: a guide for the perplexed. Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1101461.
99.
SkitkaLJTetlockPE (1993) Providing public assistance: cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology65(6): 1205–1223.
100.
SmallDALernerJS (2008) Emotional policy: personal sadness and anger shape judgments about a welfare case. Political Psychology29(2): 149–168.
101.
SmithDDKellarJWaltersEL, et al. (2015) Does emergency physician empathy reduce thoughts of litigation? A randomised trial. Emergency Medical Journal33(8): 548–552.
102.
SteeleB (2008) Ontological Security in International Relations. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
103.
StiglitzJ (2002) Overseas aid is money well spent: assistance from the West can reduce poverty in developing countries. It is time to stop making excuses. Financial Times, 15April, 02.
104.
StorbeckJCloreGL (2008) Affective arousal as information: how affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass2(5): 1824–1843.
105.
TaorminaRJMessickDM (1983) Deservingness for foreign aid: effects of need, similarity, and estimated effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology13(5): 371–391.
106.
TaorminaRJMessickDMIwawakiS, et al. (1988) Cross-cultural perspectives on foreign aid deservingness decisions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology19(4): 387–412.
107.
ThérienJ-PNoëlA (2000) Political parties and foreign aid. American Political Science Review94(1): 151–162.
108.
ThieleRNunnenkampPDreherA (2007) Do donors target aid in line with the millennium development goals? A sector perspective of aid allocation. Review of World Economics143(4): 596–630.
109.
Van OorschotW (2006) Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy16(1): 23–42.
110.
WheelerNJ (2018) Trusting Enemies: Interpersonal Relationships in International Conflict. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
111.
WilsonJPThomasRB (2004) Empathy in the Treatment of Trauma and PTSD. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
112.
WinczewskiLABowenJDCollinsNL (2016) Is empathic accuracy enough to facilitate responsive behavior in dyadic interaction? Distinguishing ability from motivation. Psychological Science27(3): 394–404.
113.
WispéL (1986) The distinction between sympathy and empathy: to call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50(2): 314–321.
114.
WongS (2016) Emotions and the communication of intentions in face-to-face diplomacy. European Journal of International Relations22(1): 144–167.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
