How does the discourse of international law facilitate extraterritorial state violence? This paper synthesizes insights from International Relations, comparative politics, and legal studies in order to explore how the sovereign foundations of international law may render “frontier territories” exceptionally vulnerable to external military intervention. I argue that international law’s focus on sovereignty constitutes frontier territories as “ambiguous,” which leads to discursive conflicts over how to define these spaces, what is considered “legal” and “illegal” action within them, and who gets to define their status. All of this creates a conducive environment for powerful international governments to denigrate frontier territories as “lawless,” by rhetorically constructing them as exceptional legal spaces that do not deserve the same protections as areas ordered by sovereign ideals. To illuminate this empirically, I conduct a discourse analysis of 16 distinct legal documents from the Obama White House, including internal memorandums and public speeches on the legal standing of drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia.
AbelRL (2018) Law’s Wars: The Fate of the Rule of Law in the US War on Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AlstonP (2010) Report of the special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. Human Rights Council, Rep. A/HRC/14/24/Add.6.
3.
BashirSCrewsRD (2012) Introduction. In: BashirSCrewsRD (eds) Under the Drones: Modern Lives in the Afghanistan Pakistan Borderlands. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1–16.
4.
BentonLA (2010) A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BestemanCL (1999) Unraveling Somalia: Race, Violence, and the Legacy of Slavery. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
ClarkeK (2009) Fictions of Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Challenge of Legal Pluralism in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
DezalayYGarthBG (2002) The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
EliasN (2010) The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14.
EslavaL (2018) The moving location of empire: indirect rule, international law, and the Bantu educational kinema experiment. Leiden Journal of International Law31(3): 539–567.
FoucaultM (1972) The Archæology of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.
18.
FoucaultM (1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
19.
GathiiJ (1998) International law and eurocentricity. European Journal of International Law9(1): 184–211.
20.
GayerL (2014) Karachi: Ordered Disorder and the Struggle for the City. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
GiddensA (1987) The Nation-State and Violence: A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
GreenblattSJ (1993) Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
GregoryD (2007) Vanishing points: law, violence and exception in the global war prison. In: GregoryDPredA (eds) Violent Geographies: Fear, Terror, and Political Violence. New York: Routledge, 205–236.
24.
Hamdan v Rumsfeld (2006) 548 U.S. 557. Hull E (2011) High-Value Target: Countering al Qaeda in Yemen. Lincoln, NE: Potomac Books.
25.
HumphreysS (2010) Theatre of the Rule of Law: Transnational Legal Intervention in Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
JacksonRH (1993) Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
JacksonRHRosbergCG (1982) Why Africa’s weak states persist: the empirical and the juridical in statehood. World Politics35(1): 1–24.
30.
JafferJ (2016) The Drone Memos. New York: The New Press.
31.
KleinfeldR (2012) Advancing the Rule of Law Abroad: Next Generation Reform. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
32.
KubálkováV (2001) Foreign policy, international politics, and constructivism. In: KubálkováV (ed.) Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 15–37.
33.
MallabyS (2002) The reluctant imperialist: terrorism, failed states, and the case for American empire. Foreign Affairs81(2): 2–7.
34.
MansellWOpenshawK (2010) The history and status of the Geneva convention. In: PerrigoSWhitmanJ (eds) The Geneva Conventions Under Assault. London, UK: Pluto Press, 18–41.
35.
MarchJGOlsenJP (1998) The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization52(4): 943–969.
36.
MasonW (ed.) (2011) The Rule of Law in Afghanistan: Missing in Inaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
MassoudMF (2013) Law’s Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
MassoudMF (2016) Ideals and practices in the rule of law: an essay on legal politics. Law and Social Inquiry41(2): 489–501.
39.
MatteiUNaderL (2008) Plunder: When the Rule of Law is Illegal. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
40.
McCriskenT (2011) Ten years on: Obama’s war on terrorism in rhetoric and practice. International Affairs87(4): 781–801.
MenkhausK (2007) Governance without government in Somalia: spoilers, state building, and the politics of coping. International Security31(3): 74–106.
43.
MerrySE (1995) Resistance and the cultural power of law. Law and Society Review29(1): 11–26.
44.
MesariN (2001) Identity and foreign policy: the case of Islam in US foreign policy. In: KubálkováV (ed.) Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
NaderLSavinarR (2016) Humanitarianism as a pretext: defining what is moral and just. In: De LauriA (ed.) The Politics of Humanitarianism: Power, Ideology and Aid. New York: I. B. Tauris, 33–56.
47.
NetzR (2004) Barbed Wire: An Ecology of Modernity. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
48.
ObamaB (2009) A just and lasting peace. Noble Lecture, 10December2009. Oslo, Norway.
49.
PachiratT (2013) Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
PahujaS (2013) Decolonizing International Law: Development, Economic Growth, and the Politics of Universality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
ParfittRS (2018) Fascism, imperialism and international law: an arch met a motorway and the rest is history. . .Leiden Journal of International Law31(3): 509–538.
Senate Committee on Intelligence 9/11 Commission (2004) Final report of the national commission on terrorist attacks upon the United States. United States Senate, Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf (accessed 15 March 2018).
60.
ShawRGrahamIAkhterM (2012) The unbearable humanness of drone warfare in FATA, Pakistan. Antipode44(4): 1490–1509.
61.
SimmonsB (2009) Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
The White House (2002) The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: The White House.
68.
ThomsonJE (1994) Mercenaries, Pirates and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
TsingAL (2015) The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
WalkerRBJ (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
72.
WeirS (2007) A Tribal Order: Politics and Law in the Mountains of Yemen. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
73.
WeldesJ (2015) High politics and low data: globalization discourses and popular culture. In: YanowDSchwartz-SheaP (eds) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. Florence, KY: Taylor and Francis, 228–238.
74.
WillisJM (2009) Making Yemen Indian: rewriting the boundaries of imperial Arabia. International Journal of Middle East Studies41(1): 23–38.
75.
YanowDSchwartz-SheaP (2015) Generating data. In: YanowDSchwartz-Shea (eds) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. Florence, KY: Taylor and Francis, 147–160.
