The protection of civilians from the dangers of warfare constitutes an imperative in contemporary global politics. Drawing on original multiarchival research, this article explains the codification of the core civilian protection rules within international humanitarian law in the 1970s. It argues that these crucial international rules resulted from the operation of two central mechanisms: Third World and Socialist-led social pressure and a strategic, face-saving reaction to it, leadership capture, in the politicized context of Cold War and decolonization-era international social competition. I demonstrate the conditional effect of social pressure by a coalition of materially weaker Third World and Socialist states upon powerful reluctant states: the United States, the United Kingdom, and more surprisingly, the Soviet Union. Third World and Socialist social pressure fostered a curious US-USSR backstage collaboration I label leadership capture, decisively shaping the legal compromise embodied in the civilian protection rules of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions. Theoretically, this article furthers burgeoning IR work on the connection between social pressure, status competition, and international rule-making. Empirically it presents a new archives-based history of an intrinsically important case in international law.
Abi-SaabG (1962) The newly independent states and the rules of international law: an outline. Howard Law Journal8(2): 95–121.
2.
Abi-SaabG (1973) The third world and the international legal order. Revue Egyptienne de Droit International29: 27–66.
3.
Abi-SaabG (1979) Wars of national liberation in the Geneva conventions and protocols. In:Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Leiden: Brill, 353–448.
4.
Abi-SaabG (2016) The third world intellectual in praxis: confrontation, participation, or operation behind enemy lines?Third World Quarterly37(11): 1957–1971.
5.
AcharyaA (2018) Constructing Global Order: Agency and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Adler-NissenR (2012) Diplomacy as Impression Management: Strategic Face-Work and Post-Colonial Embarassment. Note de Recherche, Project on Globalization and the National Security State.
7.
Adler-NissenR (2014) Stigma management in international relations: transgressive identities, norms, and order in international society. International Organization68(01): 143–176.
8.
AldrichGH (1977) Establishing legal norms through multilateral negotiation: the laws of war. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law9: 8–16.
9.
AldrichGH (1981) New life for the laws of war. American Journal of International Law75(4): 764–783.
10.
AldrichGH (1986) Progressive development of the laws of war: a reply to criticisms of the 1977 Geneva protocol I. Virginia Journal of International Law26(3): 693–720.
11.
AlexanderA (2015) A short history of international humanitarian law. European Journal of International Law26(1): 109–138.
12.
AlexanderA (2016) International humanitarian law, postcolonialism and the 1977 Geneva protocol I. Melbourne Journal of International Law17(1): 15–50.
13.
AnghieA (2007) Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BarnettM (2011) Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
15.
BaxterRR (1977) Modernizing the laws of war. Military Law Review78: 165–183.
16.
BedjaouiM (1961) Law and the Algerian Revolution. Brussels: International Associations of Democratic Lawyers.
17.
BellamyAJ (2015) The responsibility to protect turns ten. Ethics & International Affairs29(2): 161–185.
18.
BennettACheckelJT (eds) (2014) Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
BestG (1994) War and Law Since 1945. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
BettsP (2016) Universalism and its discontents: humanity as a twentieth-century concept. In: KloseFThulinM (eds) Humanity: A History of European Concepts in Practice From the Sixteenth Century to the Present. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 51–72.
21.
BotheMPartschKJSolfWA (1982) New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; distributors, Kluwer Boston.
22.
BowkerMWilliamsP (1988) Superpower Détente: A Reappraisal. London: SAGE.
23.
BurkeR (2010) Decolonization and the Evolution of International Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
24.
ColemanKP (2011) Locating norm diplomacy: venue change in international norm negotiations. European Journal of International Relations19(1): 163–186.
25.
ColganJMillerN (2019) Rival hierarchies and the origins of nuclear technology sharing. International Studies Quarterly63(2): 310–321.
26.
ConnellyM (2003) A Diplomatic Revolution: Algeria’s Fight for Independence and the Origins of the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
CrawfordE (2015) Identifying the Enemy: Civilian Participation in Armed Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
CrawfordNC (2002) Argument and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
CrawfordNC (2013) Accountability for Killing: Moral Responsibility for Collateral Damage in America’s Post-9/11 Wars. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
CrawfordNC (2014) Targeting civilians and U.S. strategic bombing norms: Plus Ça Change, Plus C’est La Même Chose? In: EvangelistaMShueH (eds) The American Way of Bombing: Changing Ethical and Legal Norms, from Flying Fortresses to Drones. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
31.
DayalAMorjé HowardL (2017) Peace operations. In: Katz-CoganJHurdIJohnstoneI (eds) Oxford Handbook of International Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
DeitelhoffN (2009) The discursive process of legalization: charting Islands of persuasion in the ICC case. International Organization63(1): 33–65.
33.
DillJ (2014) Legitimate Targets?: Social Construction, International Law and US Bombing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
DinkelJ (2019) The Non-Aligned Movement: Genesis, Organization and Politics (1927–1992). Leiden: Brill.
35.
EckelJ (2010) Essay-review: human rights and decolonization: new perspective and open questions. Humanity1(1): 111–135.
36.
EmersonR (1965) Colonialism, political development, and the UN. International Organization19(3): 484–503.
37.
EricksonJ (2015) Dangerous Trade: Arms Exports, Human Rights, and International Reputation. New York: Columbia University Press.
38.
EslavaLFakhriMNesiahV (eds) (2017) Bandung, Global History, and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
FinnemoreM (2003) The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs About the Use of Force. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
40.
FinnemoreMSikkinkK (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization52(4): 887–917.
41.
FPD (1978a) Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva (1974–1977), Vol. XIV. Bern: Federal Political Department of Switzerland.
42.
FPD (1978b) Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva (1974–1977), Vol. XV. Bern: Federal Political Department of Switzerland.
43.
GaidukI (2013) Divided Together: The United States and the Soviet Union in the United Nations, 1945–1965. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
44.
GetachewA (2019) Worldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
45.
HakimiM (2017) Constructing an international community. American Journal of International Law111(2): 317–356.
46.
HeissMA (2015) Exposing ‘red colonialism’: U.S. propaganda at the United Nations, 1953–1963. Journal of Cold War Studies17(3): 82–115.
47.
HoffmannS-L (2010) Introduction: genealogies of human rights. In: HoffmannS-L (ed) Human Rights in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1–28.
48.
ICRC (1969) Reaffirmation and Development of the Laws and Customs Applicable in Armed Conflicts, report submitted by the International Commission of the Red Cross, XXI International Conference of the Red Cross, Istanbul, September 1969. Geneva.
49.
ICRC (1972) Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International IHL Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Second Session (Geneva, 3 May - 3 June 1972), Report on the Work of the Conference, Volume II (Annexes). Geneva.
50.
JacobsonHK (1962) The united nations and colonialism: a tentative appraisal. International Organization16(1): 37–56.
51.
JensenSLB (2016) The Making of International Human Rights: The 1960s, Decolonization and the Reconstruction of Global Values. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
JohnstonAI (2008) Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
53.
KayDA (1970) The New Nations in the United Nations, 1960–1967. New York: Columbia University Press.
54.
KelleyJG (2017) Scorecard Diplomacy: The Power of Reputation to Influence States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
KinsellaHM (2011) The Image Before the Weapon: A Critical History of the Distinction between Combatant and Civilian. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
56.
LevieHS (1969) Maltreatment of prisoners of war in Vietnam. In: FalkRA (ed) The Vietnam War and International Law, Volume2, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 361–397.
57.
LevieHS (ed) (1980) Protection of War Victims: Protocol 1 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, Volume 2. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana.
58.
MantillaG (2017) The Origins and evolution of the 1949 Geneva conventions and the 1977 additional protocols. In: EvangelistaMTannenwaldN (eds) Do the Geneva Conventions Matter?Oxford: Oxford University Press, 35–68.
59.
MantillaG (2018) Forum isolation: social opprobrium and the origins of the international law of internal conflict. International Organization72(2): 317–349.
60.
MantillaG (2019) The protagonism of the USSR and socialist states in the revision of International Humanitarian Law (IHL). Journal of the History of International Law21(2): 181–211.
61.
MantillaG (n.d.) Social Pressure and International Lawmaking: The Political History of the Humanitarian Law of Internal Conflict. Draft book manuscript, forthcoming, Cornell University Press.
62.
McMahonRJ (ed) (2013) The Cold War in the Third World. USA: Oxford University Press.
63.
NairD (2019) Saving face in diplomacy: a political sociology of face-to-ace interactions in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. European Journal of International Relations25(3): 672–697.
64.
ÖzsuU (2015) ‘In the interests of mankind as a whole’: Mohammed Bedjaoui’s New International Economic Order. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development6(1): 129–143.
65.
ÖzsuU (2016) An anti-imperialist universalism? Jus Cogens and the politics of international law. In: KoskenniemiMRechWJiménez FonsecaM (eds) International Law and Empire: Historical Explorations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
PetrovaMH (2016) Rhetorical entrapment and normative enticement: how the United Kingdom turned from spoiler into champion of the cluster munition ban. International Studies Quarterly60(3): 387–399.
67.
PouliotV (2016) International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68.
PouliotVThérienJP (2018) Global governance: a struggle over universal values. International Studies Review20(1): 55–73.
69.
PriceR (1998) Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets land mines. International Organization52(3): 613–644.
70.
RisseT (2000) ‘Let’s Argue!’: communicative action in world politics. International Organization54(1): 1–39.
71.
RisseTRoppSCSikkinkK (1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
72.
SchimmelfennigF (2001) The community trap: liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization55(1): 47–80.
73.
SnyderSB (2013) Human Rights Activism and the End of the Cold War: A Transnational History of the Helsinki Network. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74.
SuterK (1984) An International Law of Guerilla Warfare: The Global Politics of Law-Making. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
75.
TownsAE (2012) Norms and social hierarchies: understanding international policy diffusion “From Below”. International Organization66(02): 179–209.
76.
TownsAERumeliliB (2017) Taking the pressure: unpacking the relation between norms, social hierarchies, and social pressures on states. European Journal of International Relations23(4): 756–779.
77.
UN (1968) Final act of the international conference on human rights, Teheran, 22 April to 13 May 1968.
78.
United States Congress (1974) Human rights in the World Community: A Call for U.S. leadership. Report of the Subcommittee on International Organizations and Movements of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, 93rd Congress, 2nd session. Washington, DC.
79.
WaltzSE (2001) Universalizing human rights: the role of small states in the construction of the universal declaration of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly23(1): 44–72.
80.
WestadOA (2005) The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and The Making of Our Times. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81.
WienerAE (2018) Constitution and Contestation of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82.
ZarakolA (2011) After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
