What is a region and how can we best understand a state’s eligibility for membership in a regional political community? Scholars have sought to answer these questions in terms of geographic proximity and social-psychological identity, but neither concept can accommodate the contestation and change that characterize the social construction of regions. Instead, this article argues that the limits of regions are defined within regional organizations by member states’ governments plus supranational actors deliberating over a common definition of the characteristics that members and potential members are expected to share. The concept of membership norms thus offers powerful insights into how regional communities define who is eligible for membership, how these definitions change over time and the incentives they create for those seeking to promote or block an applicant state. The evolution of the European Union’s membership norms since the 1950s illustrates this argument.
AbbottKWSnidalD (1998) Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution42(1): 3–32.
2.
AcharyaA (2011) The Making of Southeast Asia: International Relations of a Region. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.
Agence France-Presse (2006) Les négociations d’adhésion UE-Turquie pourraient être en danger. 29June. Available at: http://www.info-turk.be/334.htm#Relations (accessed 1 February 2016).
4.
Assemblée Parlementaire Européenne (1961) Commission Politique. Proces-Verbal de la reunion du 10 novembre 1961, APE/I/PV/61-11.
5.
Assemblée Parlementaire Européenne (1962) Débats, Session 1961–1962, Séances du 22 au 25 janvier 1962. APE/IV/62/No.52. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/44440/1/A6480.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).
6.
BildtC (2006) Open wide Europe’s doors. International Herald Tribune, 7November.
7.
BoydABoydF (1950) European Movement and the Council of Europe. London: Hutchinson & Co.
8.
Bulletin of the European Communities (1970) Report by the foreign ministers of the member states on the problems of political unification. Adopted by the foreign ministers, Luxembourg, 27October1970, No. 11, pp. 9–14. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/4543/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
9.
CampsM (1964) The Six and Political Union. The World Today20(11): 473–80.
CheckelJT (2005) International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization59(4): 801–826.
12.
CheckelJTKatzensteinPJ (2009) European Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Commission of the European Economic Community (1959) First memorandum from the Commission of the European Economic Community to the Council of Ministers of the Community. 26February. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/933/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
14.
Constitutional Committee (1953a) Draft treaty embodying the statute of the European Community. Information and official documents of the Constitutional Committee, October 1952–April 1953. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/991/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
15.
Constitutional Committee (1953b) Ad hoc assembly instructed to work out a draft treaty setting up a European Political Community, session of January 1953. Report of the Constitutional Committee. Paris, 20December1952. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/33690/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
16.
CrowleyU (2009) Genealogy method. In: KitchinRThriftN (eds) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 341–344.
European Parliament (1964) Towards political union. A selection of documents with a foreword by Mr. Emilio Battista. European Parliament, Political Committee, January. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/944/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
21.
FinnemoreMSikkinkK (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization52(4): 897–917.
22.
Giscardd’EstaingV (2000) Europe, Austria and Turkey. New Perspectives Quarterly17(2): 18–20.
23.
HallsteinW (1962) The European Economic Community as an element in a new world order. Address to the Diplomatic Press Association, Paris, 22June. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/14825/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
24.
HallsteinW (1972) The Making of Europe. London: George Allen & Unwin.
25.
HemmerCKatzensteinPJ (2002) Why is there no NATO in Asia? Collective identity, regionalism, and the origins of multilateralism. International Organization56(3): 576–607.
26.
HerrmannRK. (eds) (2004) Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
27.
HurrellA (2005) Power, institutions, and the production of inequality. In: BarnettMDuvallR (eds) Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KlotzAPrakashD (2009) Qualitative Methods in International Relations. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
KochenovD (2004) Behind the Copenhagen façade: The meaning and structure of the Copenhagen political criterion of democracy and the rule of law. European Integration online Papers8(10). Available at: http://eif.univie.ac.at/EIoP_Archive/pdf/2004-010.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).
30.
KrasnerS (1988) Sovereignty: An institutional perspective. Comparative Political Studies21(1): 66–94.
31.
KupchanCA (2010) How Enemies Become Friends: The Sources of Stable Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
MannersI (2002) Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms?Journal of Common Market Studies40(2): 235–258.
33.
MansfieldELMilnerHV (1997) The Political Economy of Regionalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
34.
MarjolinR (1958) The free world’s stake in the Common Market. Address to the International Press Institute and the American Society of Newspaper Editors, Washington DC, 17April. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/14404/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
35.
Ministère des Affaires étrangères (1996) Documents Diplomatiques Français 1960 Tome 1 (1 janvier–30 juin). Paris.
36.
MonnetJ (1955) Les Etats-Unis d’Europe ont Commencé. Paris: Robert Laffont.
37.
NeumannIB (1999) Uses of the Other: The ‘East’ in European Identity Formation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
38.
NyeJS (1971) Peace in Parts: Integration and Conflict in Regional Organization. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
39.
Official Journal of the European Communities (1977) Joint declaration by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission. 77/C 103/01, 27April.
40.
PayneRA (2001) Persuasion, frames and norm construction. European Journal of International Relations7(1): 37–61.
41.
PevehouseJC (2000) Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
PhinnemoreD (1999) Association: Stepping-Stone or Alternative to EU Membership?Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
43.
PistoneS (1993) Il ruolo di Altiero Spinelli nella genesi dell’art.38 della Comunità Europea di Difesa e del progetto di Comunità Politica Europea. In: TrauschG (ed.) The European Integration from the Schuman-Plan to the Treaties of Rome. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, pp. 393–413.
44.
PredaD (1992) From a defence community to a political community: The role of de Gasperi and Spinelli. In: BoscoA (ed.) The Federal Idea, Vol. II: The History of Federalism since 1945. London: Lothian Foundation Press, pp. 189–206.
45.
Press and Information Office (1988) Document on the European identity published by the nine Foreign Ministers, Copenhagen, 14December1973. In: European Political Cooperation (5th edn). Bonn: Press and Information Office, Federal Republic of Germany. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/4545/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
46.
ReyJ (1962) Conference prononcée en la salle Academique de l’Université de Liege, le 9 avril. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/14811 (accessed 1 February 2016).
47.
RisseT (2010) A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
48.
RuggieJG (1999) What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. In: KatzensteinPJ (eds) Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49.
RumeliliB (2004) Constructing identity and relating to difference: Understanding the EU’s mode of differentiation. Review of International Studies30(1): 27–47.
50.
SaidEW (1978) Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
51.
SchimmelfennigF (2001) The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union. International Organization55(1): 47–80.
52.
SeverinoRC (2006) Southeast Asia in Search of an ASEAN Community: Insights from the Former ASEAN Secretary-General. Singapore: ISAES Publishing.
53.
StirkPWeigallD (eds) (1999) The Origins and Development of European Integration: A Reader and Commentary. London: Pinter.
54.
StockR (1962) Strasbourg: Passionnant Débat Politique au Parlement Européen. Les Dernières Nouvelles d’Alsace (Strasbourg), 24January, p. 5.
55.
TraynorI (2006) The EU’s weary travellers. The Guardian, 4April.
56.
United States Government Printing Office (1977) Foreign Relations of the United States, 1950, Volume 3: Western Europe. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
VankeJW (2001) An Impossible Union: Dutch Objections to the Fouchet Plan, 1959–62. Cold War History2(1): 95–112.
61.
WendtA (1992) Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization46(2): 391–425.
62.
WienerA (2004) Contested compliance: Interventions on the normative structure of world politics. European Journal of International Relations10(2): 189–234.
