The United Nations Peacebuilding Commission was created in 2005 to have oversight of United Nations peacebuilding operations. In the foundational resolution, adopted simultaneously by the United Nations Security Council (S/RES/1645) and the United Nations General Assembly (A/RES/60/180), the Peacebuilding Commission is mandated to encourage meaningful participation in peacebuilding-related activities by civil society actors. This article investigates the construction of ‘civil society’ as a subject of United Nations peacebuilding discourse, drawing on both policy documents and interview data. The inclusion of civil society actors in peacebuilding-related activities is currently considered central to the success of these activities; if it is taken for granted that the meaningful participation of civil society actors ensures that United Nations programmes build better peace, and I argue that it is, then it is important to understand what is meant by ‘civil society’ and to comprehend the kinds of actions that are prescribed and proscribed by the meanings attached to the concept. Specifically, I map out a peacebuilding discourse that (re)produces the United Nations — as representative of ‘the international community’ — as the architect/legitimate knower of peacebuilding practice, and the communities working on building peace as the labourers/known objects. This has significant implications for the ways in which civil society organisations, and the forms of knowledge that these organisations represent, are encountered and engaged in peacebuilding practices; ‘local’ knowledge is at once valued (in the process of extraction) and yet subordinated.
BakerG (2002) Problems in the theorisation of global civil society. Political Studies50(5): 928–943.
2.
BarnettMDuvallR (2005) Power in global governance. In: BarnettMDuvallR (eds) Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32.
3.
BarnettMFinnemoreM (2005) The power of liberal international organizations. In: BarnettMDuvallR (eds) Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 16–184.
4.
BartelsonJ (2006) Making sense of global civil society. European Journal of International Relations12(3): 371–395.
5.
CampbellD (1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
CampbellD (1998) National Deconstruction: Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
7.
CampbellPJ (2005) Gender and post-conflict civil society. International Feminist Journal of Politics7(3): 377–399.
8.
CaparasoJA (1992) International Relations theory and multilateralism: The search for foundations. International Organization46(3): 599–632.
9.
CarpenterTG (ed.) (1997) Delusions of Grandeur: The United Nations and Global Intervention. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
10.
ChandhokeN (2002) The limits of global civil society. In: GlasiusMKaldorMAnheierH (eds) Global Civil Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–53.
11.
ChandlerD (2010) Race, culture and civil society: Peacebuilding discourse and the understanding of difference. Security Dialogue41(4): 369–390.
12.
ClaudeIL (1966) Collective legitimization as a political function of the United Nations. International Organization20(3): 367–379.
13.
CohnC (1987) Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society12(4): 687–718.
14.
CohnC (2006) Motives and methods: Using multi-sited ethnography to study US national security discourses. In: AckerlyBSternMTrueJ (eds) Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–107.
15.
CohnCKinsellaHGibbingsS (2004) Women, peace and security: Resolution 1325. International Feminist Journal of Politics6(1): 130–140.
16.
ConnellR (1987) Masculinities. London: SAGE.
17.
CoxR (1999) Civil society at the turn of the millennium: Prospects for an alternative world order. Review of International Studies25(1): 3–28.
18.
Der DerianJ (2009 [2001]) Virtuous War: Mapping the Military–Industrial–Media–Entertainment–Network (2nd edn). London: Routledge.
19.
Der DerianJShapiroM (eds) (1989) International/Intertextual Relations: Boundaries of Knowledge and Practice in World Politics, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
20.
DerridaJ (1972) Positions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
DotyRL (1993) Foreign policy as social construction: A post-positivist analysis of U.S. counterinsurgency policy in the Philippines. International Studies Quarterly37(3): 297–320.
22.
DotyRL (1996) Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North–South Relations. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
EinhornBSeverC (2003) Gender and civil society in Central and Eastern Europe. International Feminist Journal of Politics5(2): 163–190.
24.
EnloeC (1989) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25.
EnloeC (1993) The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26.
FoucaultM (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge (trans. SmithS). London: Tavistock Publications.
27.
GaddisJL (1992) International Relations theory and the end of the Cold War. International Security17(3): 5–58.
28.
GötzN (2008) Reframing NGOs: The identity of an International Relations non-starter. European Journal of International Relations14(2): 231–258.
29.
GriffinP (2009) Gendering the World Bank: Neoliberalism and the Gendered Foundations of Global Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
GustersonH (1996) Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
HallS (1985) Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication2(2): 91–114.
32.
HansenL (2006) Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.
33.
HoffmannSKeohaneRMearsheimerJJ (1990) Back to the future, part II: International Relations theory and post-Cold War Europe. International Security15(2): 191–199.
34.
HopgoodS (2000) Reading the small print in global civil society: The inexorable hegemony of the liberal self. Millennium: Journal of International Studies29(1): 1–25.
35.
HowellJ (2005) Introduction. In: HowellJMulliganD (eds) Gender and Civil Society: Transcending Boundaries. London: Routledge, pp. 1–22.
36.
JacksonR (2005) Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
37.
JarvisL (2009) Times of Terror: Discourse, Temporality and the War on Terror. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
KabeerN (1999) Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change30: 435–464.
KarlM (1995) Women and Empowerment: Participation and Decision Making. London: Zed.
41.
KeohaneRMartinL (1995) The promise of institutionalist theory. International Security20(1): 39–51.
42.
KratochwilFRuggieJG (1986) International organization: A state of the art on an art of the state. International Organization40(4): 753–775.
43.
LaclauEMouffeC (2001 [1985]) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (2nd edn). London: Verso.
44.
LebowRNRisse-KappenT (eds) (1995) International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
45.
LipschutzR (1992) Reconstructing world politics: The emergence of global civil society. Millennium: Journal of International Studies21(3): 389–420.
46.
LipschutzR (2000) Crossing borders: Global civil society and the reconfiguration of transnational political space. GeoJournal52(1): 17–23.
47.
LipschutzR (2005) Power, politics and global civil society. Millennium: Journal of International Studies33(3): 747–769.
48.
McKeonN (2009) The United Nations and Civil Society: Legitimating Global Governance — Whose Voice?London: Zed.
49.
MaloneDM (2000) The Security Council in the 1990s: Inconsistent, improvisational, indispensable? In: ThakurRNewmanE (eds) New Millennium, New Perspectives: The United Nations, Security and Governance. New York, NY: UN University Press, pp. 21–45.
50.
MearshiemerJJ (1990) Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security15(1): 5–56.
51.
MearsheimerJJ (1995) The false promise of international institutions. International Security19(3): 5–49.
52.
MethmannCP (2010) ‘Climate protections’ as empty signifier: A discourse theoretical perspective on climate mainstreaming in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies39(2): 345–372.
53.
MillikenJ (1999) The study of discourse in International Relations: A critique of research methods. European Journal of International Relations5(2): 225–254.
54.
MohanG (2002) The disappointments of civil society: The politics of NGO intervention in Northern Ghana. Political Geography21(1): 125–154.
55.
MohantyCT (1988) Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review30: 61–88.
56.
MoonK (1997) Sex Among Allies: Military Prostitution in US–Korea Relations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
57.
MurphyC (2000) Global governance: Poorly done and poorly understood. International Affairs76(4): 789–803.
58.
NexonDHNeumannIB (eds) (2006) Harry Potter and International Relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
59.
PetersonVSRunyanAS (1999) Global Gender Issues. Oxford and Boulder, CO: Westview.
60.
PhillipsA (1991) Engendering Democracy. Pennsylvania, PA: Penn State Press.
61.
PhillipsA (1995) The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62.
RaiSWaylenG (eds) (2008) Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
63.
RandallV (1987 [1982]) Women in Politics: International Perspectives. London: Routledge.
64.
RobinsonP (2002) The CNN Effect: The Myth of News, Foreign Policy and Intervention. London: Routledge.
65.
RosenauJ (1992) Governance, order and change in world politics. In: RosenauJCzempielE (eds) Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–29.
66.
RosenauJ (1995) Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance1(1): 13–43.
67.
RosenauJCzempielE (eds) (1992) Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
RuggieJG (1982) International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization36(2): 379–415.
69.
RuggieJG (1992) Multilateralism: The anatomy of an institution.International Organization46(3): 561–598.
70.
ScholteJA (2002) Civil society and governance in the global polity. In: OugaardMHiggottR (eds) Towards and Global Polity. London: Routledge, pp. 145–166.
United Nations Economic and Social Council (UN ECOSOC) (1996) Resolution 1996/31 consultative relationship between the United Nations and non-government organizations. Available at: http://esango.un.org/paperless/reports/1996_31_E.pdf (accessed 27 February 2015).
85.
United Nations General (UN GA) (2000) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly 55/2 United Nations Millennium Declaration (A/RES/55/2). Available at: http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm (accessed 27 February 2015).
United Nations General Assembly (UN GA) (2005b) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly 60/1 2005 World Summit Outcome (A/RES/60/1). Available at: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/ods/A-RES-60-1-E.pdf (accessed 27 February 2015).
88.
United Nations General Assembly/United Nations Security Council (UN GA/SC) (2010) Review of the United Nations peacebuilding architecture (A/64/868–S/2010/393). Available at: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/64/868 (accessed 27 February 2015).
