Bourdieu and the bomb: Power,language and the doxic battle over the value of nuclear weapons

Abstract

Building on Bourdieu’s social theory, this article shows how powerful agents are able to challenge deeply engrained assumptions about the value of nuclear weapons. To illustrate the value of a Bourdieu-inspired analysis in the field of nuclear weapons, we apply his thinking tools of field, symbolic capital and doxa to the recent plea for nuclear disarmament by the US elder statesmen Shultz, Perry, Kissinger and Nunn. We analyse how the four revitalized the topic of nuclear disarmament, moving it from the fringes of peace research and grass-roots advocacy to the mainstream of academic research and politics. We argue that the historical context, the high symbolic capital of Shultz and his colleagues, and an appealing narrative that draws on commonplace understandings made their plea resonate with security elites.

Keywords

Bourdieu disarmament language nuclear weapons symbolic power

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

(2005 [1991]) Cognitive evolution: A dynamic for the study of international relations and their progress. In: Adler

(ed.) Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations. London and New York: Routledge, 65–88.

Adler-Nissen

(2011) On a field trip with Bourdieu. International Political Sociology 5(3): 327–330.

Amossy

(2002a) How to do things with doxa: Toward an analysis of argumentation in discourse. Poetics Today 23(3): 465–487.

Amossy

(2002b) Introduction to the study of doxa. Poetics Today 23(3): 369–394.

Ayoob

(1989) The third world in the system of states: Acute schizophrenia or growing pains? International Studies Quarterly 33(1): 67–79.

Balzacq

(2005) The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations 11(2): 171–201.

Barnett

Duvall

(2005) Power in international politics. International Organization 59(1): 39–75.

Benford

Snow

(2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.

Bigo

(2011) Pierre Bourdieu and international relations: Power of practices, practices of power. International Political Sociology 5(3): 225–258.

10.

Bigo

Madsen

(2011) Introduction to symposium ‘A Different Reading of the International’: Pierre Bourdieu and international studies. International Political Sociology 5(3): 219–224.

11.

Bourdieu

(1986) Forms of capital. In: Richardson

(ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press, 47–58.

12.

Bourdieu

(1989) Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory 7(1): 14–25.

13.

Bourdieu

(1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

14.

Bourdieu

(1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.

15.

Bourdieu

Wacquant

LJD

(1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Boyer

(1994) By the Bomb’s Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age. Chapel Hill, NC and London: University of North Carolina Press.

17.

Buley

(2008) The New American Way of War: Military Culture and the Political Utility of Force. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

18.

Butler

(1996) National Press Club remarks (4 December). Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/1996/12/04_butler_abolition-speech.htm

19.

Butler

(1997) The General’s bombshell: Phasing out the US nuclear arsenal. Washington Quarterly 20(3): 131–135.

20.

Butler

(2000) Zero tolerance. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist 56(1): 20–21, 72–75.

21.

Buzan

Wæver

De Wilde

(1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

22.

Canberra Commission on the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons (1996) Report of the Canberra Commission on the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons. Canberra: National Capital Printers.

23.

Chilton

(1985) Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate: Nukespeak Today. London: Frances Pinter.

24.

Churchill

(2003 [1955]) Never despair! In: Churchill

(ed.) Never Given In! The Best of Winston Churchill’s Speeches. New York: Hyperion.

25.

Colby

(2008) Nuclear abolition: A dangerous illusion. Orbis 52(3): 424–433.

26.

Cortright

Väyrynen

(2010) Towards Nuclear Zero, Adelphi Paper, 410. New York and London: Routledge and the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

27.

Cranston

(2001) Commit to abolition. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist 57(1): 39–41.

28.

Daley

(2010) Apocalypse Never: Forging the Path to a Nuclear Weapon-Free World. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.

29.

David

(2010) The dangerous fantasy of a nuclear-free world. The Wall Street Journal 29 March.

30.

Department of Defense (2001) Nuclear Posture Review [Excerpts]. Available at: http://www.imi-online.de/download/Nuclear_Posture_Review.pdf

31.

Department of Defense (2010) Nuclear Posture Review Report. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/npr/

32.

Douthat

(2010) The dream of zero. The New York Times 8 February. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/08/opinion/08douthat.html

33.

Enemark

(2011) Farewell to WMD: The language and science of mass destruction. Contemporary Security Policy 32(2): 382–400.

34.

Feith

Shulsky

(2010) The dangerous illusion of ‘nuclear zero’. The Wall Street Journal 21 May: A15.

35.

Fischer

(2003) Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

36.

Flank

(1993/1994) Exploding the black box: The historical sociology of nuclear proliferation. Security Studies 3(2): 259–294.

37.

Frank

Rivard

(1986) Antinuclear admirals: An interview study. Political Psychology 7(1): 23–52.

38.

Goodpastor

(1995) An Evolving US Nucear Posture. Second Report of the Steering Committee, Project on Eliminating Weapons of Mass Destruction. Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center.

39.

Gorbachev

(2007) The nuclear threat. The Wall Street Journal 31 January: A13.

40.

Gusterson

(1999) Nuclear weapons and the other in the Western imagination. Cultural Anthropology 14(1): 111–143.

41.

Gusterson

(2009) Narrating abolition. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist 65(3): 13–18.

42.

Guzzini

(2000) A reconstruction of constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 147–182.

43.

Guzzini

(2007) The concept of power: A constructivist analysis. In: Berenskoetter

Williams

(eds) Power in World Politics. London and New York: Routledge, 23–42.

44.

Harrel

(2011) The Four Horsemen of the Nuclear Apocalypse: In conversation. TIME 20 May. Available at: http://nation.time.com/2011/05/20/the-four-horsemen-of-the-nuclear-apocalypse-in-conversation/

45.

Harrington de Santana

(2009) Nuclear Weapons as the Currency of Power: Deconstructing the Fetishism of Force. Nonproliferation Review 16(3): 325–345.

46.

Holloway

(2011) The vision of a world free of nuclear weapons. In: McArdle Kellerher

Reppy

(eds) Getting to Zero. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 11–27.

47.

Homolar

(2010) Rebels without a conscience: The evolution of the rogue states narrative in US security policy. European Journal of International Relations 17(4): 705–727.

48.

Hook

(1985) Making nuclear weapons easier to live with: The political role of language in nuclearization. Bulletin of Peace Proposals 16(1): 67–77.

49.

Hopf

(1998) The promise of constructivism in International Relations theory. International Security 23(1): 171–200.

50.

Hurd

Rifkind

Owen

(2008) Start worrying and learn to ditch the bomb. The Sunday Times 30 June. Available at: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article4237387.ec

51.

Hymans

JEC

(2006) The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

52.

Hymans

JEC

(2011) Veto players, nuclear energy, and nonproliferation. International Security 36(2): 154–189.

53.

Jackson

(2008) Pierre Bourdieu, the ‘cultural turn’ and the practice of international history. Review of International Studies 34(1): 155–181.

54.

Joffe

Davis

(2011) Less than zero: Bursting the new disarmament bubble. Foreign Affairs 90(1): 7–13.

55.

Johnson

Kristensen

Sanguinetti

. (1996) Statement on nuclear weapons by international generals and admirals (5 December). Available at: http://www.nuclearfiles.org/menu/key-issues/ethics/issues/military/statement-by-international-generals.htm

56.

Kaplan

(1983) The Wizards of Armageddon. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

57.

Kissinger

(1957) Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. New York: Harper.

58.

Kissinger

(2010) Statement of Dr Henry A. Kissinger before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (25 May). Available at: http://www.nuclearsecurityproject.org/publications/statement-of-dr-henry-a-kissinger-before-the-senate-foreign-relations-committee

59.

Kornprobst

(2011) Scholarship writ large: Universals, rhetorical interventions, and political judgements. In: Bjola

Kornprobst

(eds) Arguing Global Governance: Agency, Lifeword, and Shared Reasoning. London and New York: Routledge, 157–173.

60.

Kyl

Perle

(2009) Our decaying nuclear deterrent. The Wall Street Journal 29 June: A13.

61.

Lavoy

(1993) Nuclear myths and the causes of nuclear proliferation. Security Studies 2(3/4): 102–212.

62.

Lavoy

(2006) Nuclear proliferation over the next decade: Causes, warning signs, and policy responses. Nonproliferation Review 13(3): 433–454.

63.

Leander

(2008) Thinking tools. In: Klotz

Prakash

(eds) Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 11–27.

64.

Litwak

(2007) Regime Change: US Strategy Through the Prism of 9/11. Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press.

65.

McArdle Kelleher

(2011) Introduction. In: McArdle Kelleher

Reppy

(eds) Getting to Zero. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1–8.

66.

McNamara

(1992) One minute to doomsday. The New York Times 14 October. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/1992/10/14/opinion/one-minute-to-doomsday.html

67.

McNamara

(1995) The nuclear emperor has no clothes. New Perspectives Quarterly 12(3): Available at: http://www.digitalnpq.org/archive/1995_summer/emperor.html

68.

McNamara

(2005a) Apocalypse soon. Foreign Policy 148: 28–35.

69.

McNamara

(2005b) The folly of US and NATO nuclear weapons policies. International Affairs 51(3): 104–124.

70.

McNamara

Caldicott

(2002) Still on catastrophe’s edge. The Los Angeles Times 26 April. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2004/apr/26/opinion/oe-caldicott26

71.

Maliniak

(2011) International Relations in the US academy. International Studies Quarterly 55(2): 437–464.

72.

Masco

(2006) The Nuclear Borderlands: The Manhattan Project in Post-Cold War New Mexico. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

73.

May

(1999) Introduction. In: Gaddis

Gordon

May

. (eds) Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy since 1945. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1–11.

74.

Mazarr

(1997) Introduction. Washington Quarterly 20(3): 77–83.

75.

Mérand

(2010) Pierre Bourdieu and the birth of European defense. Security Studies 19(2): 342–374.

76.

Morgenthau

(1976) The fallacy of thinking conventionally about nuclear weapons. In: Charlton

Schaerf

(eds) Arms Control and Technological Innovation. New York: Wiley, 256–264.

77.

Muller

(2010) Atomic Obsession: Nuclear Alarmism from Hiroshima to Al-Qaeda. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

78.

Mutimer

(1997) Reimagining security: The metaphors of proliferation In: Krause

Williams

(eds) Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases. London and New York: Routledge, 187–221.

79.

Nitze

(1999) A threat mostly to ourselves. The New York Times 28 October. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/1999/10/28/opinion/a-threat-mostly-to-ourselves.html

80.

Nunn

(2008) The mountaintop: A world free of nuclear weapons (27 February). Available at: http://www.nuclearsecurityproject.org/publications/the-mountaintop-a-world-free-of-nuclear-weapons

81.

Obama

(2009) Remarks by President Barack Obama (5 April). Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-By-President-Barack-Obama-In-Prague-As-Delivered/

82.

Ogilvie-White

Santoro

(2010) The dynamics of nuclear disarmament: New momentum and the future of the nonproliferation regime. Nonproliferation Review 17(1): 17–21.

83.

Oppermann

Röttsches

(2010) NGOs as catalysts for international arms control? The ratification of the Chemical Weapons Convention and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in the United States. Journal of International Relations and Development 13: 239–267.

84.

Paul

(2000) Power versus Prudence: Why Nations Forgo Nuclear Weapons. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

85.

Pelopidas

(2011) The oracles of proliferation: How experts maintain a biased historical reading that limits policy innovation. Nonproliferation Review 18(1): 297–314.

86.

Perkovich

(2001) India’s Nuclear Bomb: The Impact on Global Proliferation. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

87.

Perle

(2011) Yes, nukes: The global zero utopia. World Affairs (March/April): 47–56.

88.

Perry

(2007) Testimony House Armed Services Committee Strategic Forces Subcomittee (18 July). Available at: http://www.nuclearsecurityproject.org/publications/testimony-house-armed-services-committee-strategic-forces-subcommittee

89.

Perry

(2009) Proliferation, catastrophic terrorism and a new security paradigm (1 June). Available at: http://www.nuclearsecurityproject.org/publications/proliferation-catastrophic-terrorism-and-a-new-security-paradigm

90.

Potter

Mukhatzhanova

(2010) Forecasting Nuclear Proliferation in the 21st Century, Volume 1: The Role of Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

91.

Pouliot

(2008) The logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities. International Organization 62(2): 257–288.

92.

Pouliot

(2010) International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO–Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

93.

Rix

(1997) Discipline and threatened punishment: The theory of nuclear deterrence and the discipline of strategic studies, 1946–1960. Department of Science and Technology Studies, University of Wollongong.

94.

Sagan

(1996/1997) Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb. International Security 21(3): 54–86.

95.

Sagan

(2011) The causes of nuclear weapons proliferation. Annual Review of Political Science 14: 225–244.

96.

Schmidt

Von Weizsäcker

Bahr

. (2009) Toward a nuclear-free world: A German view. The New York Times 9 January. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/09/opinion/09iht-edschmidt.1.19226604.html

97.

Shils

(1965) Charisma, order and status. American Sociological Review 30(2): 199–213.

98.

Shultz

(2008) The age of diplomacy (26 February). Available at: http://www.nuclearsecurityproject.org/uploads/publications/Statement_Shultz.pdf

99.

Shultz

Gardels

(2010) Does the Obama nuclear strategy put the US at risk? Christian Science Monitor 14 April.

100.

Shultz

Perry

Kissinger

HA, et al.

(2007) A world free of nuclear weapons. The Wall Street Journal 4 January: A15.

101.

Shultz

Perry

Kissinger

. (2008) Toward a nuclear free world. The Wall Street Journal 15 January: A13.

102.

Shultz

Perry

Kissinger

(2010) How to protect our nuclear deterrent. The Wall Street Journal 19 January. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704152804574628344282735008.html

103.

Shultz

Perry

Kissinger

. (2011) Deterrence in the age of nuclear proliferation. The Wall Street Journal 7 March. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703300904576178760530169414.html

104.

Solingen

(2007) Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

105.

Squassioni

(2009) The new disarmament discussion. Current History 714: 33–38.

106.

Taubman

(2012) The partnership: Five cold Warriors and their Quest to Ban the Bomb. New York: HarperCollins.

107.

Thompson

(2009) The Hawk and the Dove: Paul Nitze, George Kennan, and the History of the Cold War. New York: Henry Holt.

108.

Thomson Reuters (2010) 2010 JCR Social Science Edition. http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR

109.

Villumsen

(2008) Theory as practice and capital: NATO in a Bourdieusian field of security in Europe: Towards a sociological approach to IR. PhD Dissertation, University of Copenhagen.

110.

Villumsen

(2010) Capitalizing on Bourdieu: Boundary-setting, agency, and doxic battles in IR. Paper presented at the Dansk Selskab for Statskundskab, 4–5 November.

111.

Villumsen Berling

(2011) Science and securitization: Objectivation, the authority of the speaker and mobilization of scientific facts. Security Dialogue 42(4/5): 385–397.

112.

Wæver

(2000) The EU as a security actor: Reflections from a pessimistic constructivist on post-sovereign security orders. In: Kelstrup

Williams

(eds) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration. London: Routledge, 250–294.

113.

Walker

(2007) Nuclear enlightenment and counter-enlightenment. International Affairs 83(3): 431–453.

114.

Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission (2006) Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Arms. Stockholm.

115.

Wendt

(1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

116.

Williams

(2007) Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security. New York and London: Routledge.

117.

Wisotzki

(2005) Macht ‘Macht’ Diskurse produktiv? In: Ulbert

Weller

(eds) Konstruktivistische Analysen der internationalen Politik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

118.

Wittner

(2003) Toward Nuclear Abolition: A History of the World Disarmament Movement, 1971 to the Present. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.