Abstract
Owing to errors made at SAGE, the article ‘Theorizing the image for Security Studies: Visual securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis’, Volume 17, Number 1, March 2011, pp. 51–74, 10.1177/1354066110388593, contained a grammatical error on p. 59.
‘It is perhaps no surprise that this increased cross-boundary engagement multiplying the ways the image can be constituted.’
The above sentence should read:
‘It is perhaps no surprise that this increased cross-boundary engagement multiplies the ways in which the image can be constituted.’
SAGE apologizes to the authors and readers for any inconvenience or embarrassment caused.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.