This article employs a cross-level approach to explain cooperation in transatlantic
competition policy. The explanation reveals the important role of regulators as
interfaces between the domestic and international levels of analysis. Economic
internationalization is a system-level cause of this cooperation, the precise effect
of which is accounted for by an intervening variable (domestic politics), which is
simplified with a principal-agent model. The negotiations over the 1991 EU-US
Bilateral Competition Agreement suggest that, while regulators remain constrained by
domestic institutions, they play an important role in explaining why the formal,
transatlantic cooperative framework is largely a discretionary one created by a
non-treaty international agreement.
Brittan, Leon
(1990)
‘Jurisdictional Issues in EEC Competition Law’
, Hersch Lauterpacht Lecture,
Cambridge, 8 February.
2.
Calvert, Randall
,
Mathew McCubbins
and
Barry Weingast
(1989)
‘A Theory of Political Control and Agency Discretion’
, American Journal of Political Science33(3):
588-611
.
3.
Chase, Kerry A.
(2004)
‘From Protectionism to Regionalism: Multinational Firms and
Trade-Related Investment Measures’
, Business and Politics6(2):
1-36
.
4.
Damro, Chad
(2001)
‘Building an International Identity: The EU and Extraterritorial
Competition Policy’
, Journal of European Public Policy8(2):
208-226
.
5.
Damro, Chad
(2004)
‘Multilateral Competition Policy and Transatlantic Compromise’
, European Foreign Affairs Review9(2):
269-287
.
6.
Damro, Chad
(2005) ‘A Sole of Discretion: Competition
Relations in the Transatlantic Marketplace’, in
Michelle Egan
(ed.) Creating a Transatlantic Marketplace: Government Policies and
Business Strategies, pp. 62-81.
Manchester: Manchester University Press
.
7.
Devuyst, Youri
(2000)
‘Toward a Multilateral Competition Policy Regime?’
, Global Governance6(3):
319-338
.
8.
ECJ (European Court of Justice)
(1993)
Opinion of Mr Advocate General Tesauro delivered on 16 December 1993. Case C-327/91
, European Court Reports 1994,
3641-3665
.
9.
ECJ (European Court of Justice)
(1994)
Judgment of the Court, 9 August 1994. Case C-327/91
, European Court Reports 1994,
3666-3679
.
10.
Epstein, David
and
Sharyn O’Halloran
(1999) Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics
Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
11.
Epstein, David
and
Sharyn O’Halloran
(1994)
‘Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion’
, American Journal of Political Science38:
697-722
.
12.
European Commission (1994) Commission Communication to the Council. Brussels,
12 October, COM (94) 430 Final.
13.
European Commission (1996) Report to the Council and the European Parliament.
Brussels, 8 October, COM (96) 479 Final.
14.
Evans, David S.
(2002)
‘The New Trustbusters: Brussels and Washington May Part Ways’
, Foreign Affairs81(1):
14-20
.
15.
Evans, Peter B.
,
Harold Jacobson
and
Robert Putnam
(1993) Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and
Domestic Politics.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
16.
Fox, Eleanor M.
(2001) ‘Antitrust Law on a Global Scale: Races
Up, Down, and Sideways’, in
Daniel C. Esty
and
Damien Geradin
(eds) Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration: Comparative
Perspectives, pp. 348-363.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
17.
Frieden, Jeffry
and
Lisa L. Martin
(2002) ‘International Political Economy: Global
and Domestic Interactions’, in
Ira Katznelson
and
Helen V. Milner
(eds) Political Science: State of the Discipline, pp.
118-146.
New York: W.W. Norton
.
18.
Garrett, Geoffrey
and
Peter Lange
(1995)
‘Internationalization, Institutions, and Political Change’
, International Organization49(4):
627-655
.
19.
Gerber, David J.
(2001) Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe:
Protecting Prometheus.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
20.
Griffin, Joseph P.
(1998)
‘Foreign Governmental Reactions to US Assertions of
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction’
, European Competition Law Review19:
64-73
.
21.
Griffin, Joseph P.
(1999)
‘Extraterritoriality in US and EU Antitrust Enforcement’
, Antitrust Law Journal67:
159-199
.
22.
Grossman, Gene M.
and
Elhanan Helpman
(1995)
‘Trade Wars and Trade Talks’
, Journal of Political Economy103(4):
675-708
.
23.
Ham, Allard D.
(1993)
‘International Cooperation in the Anti-Trust Field and in
Particular the Agreement between the United States of America and the
Commission of the European Communities’
, Common Market Law Review30:
39-62
.
24.
Held, David
,
Anthony McGrew
,
David Goldblatt
and
Jonathan Perraton
(1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and
Culture.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
25.
Hosli, Madeliene O.
(2000)
‘The Creation of the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU):
Intergovernmental Negotiations and Two-level Games’
, Journal of European Public Policy7 (5):
744-766
.
26.
Huber, John
,
Charles Shipan
and
Madelaine Pfahler
(2001)
‘Legislatures and Statutory Control of Bureaucracy’
, American Journal of Political Science45(2):
330-345
.
27.
(ICPAC) International Competition Policy Advisory Committee
(2000) Final Report.
Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office
.
28.
Keohane, Robert O.
(1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World
Political Economy.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
29.
Keohane, Robert O.
and
Helen Milner
(eds) (1996) Internationalization and Domestic
Politics.
New York: Cambridge University Press
.
30.
König, Thomas
and
Simon Hug
(2000)
‘Ratifying Maastricht: Parliamentary Votes on International
Treaties and Theoretical Solution Concepts’
, European Union Politics1(1):
93-124
.
31.
Kovacic, William E.
(2001)
‘Transatlantic Turbulence: The Boeing-McDonnell Douglas Merger
and International Competition Policy’
, Antitrust Law Journal68:
805-873
.
32.
Kremenyuk, Victor
and
Gunnar Sjostedt
(eds) (2000) International Economic Negotiation: Models
versus Reality.
Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
.
33.
McCubbins, Mathew D.
and
Thomas Schwartz
(1984)
‘Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms’
, American Journal of Political Science28:
165-179
.
34.
Majone, Giandomenico
(1996) Regulating Europe.
London: Routledge
.
35.
Majone, Giandomenico
(2000) ‘International Regulatory Cooperation: A
Neo-Institutionalist Approach’, in
George Bermann
,
Matthias Herdegen
and
Peter L. Lindseth
(eds) Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: Legal Problems and Political
Prospects, pp. 119-145.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
36.
Margolis, Lawrence
(1986) Executive Agreements and Presidential Power in Foreign
Policy.
New York: Praeger
.
37.
Martin, Lisa
(2000) Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International
Cooperation.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
38.
Mehta, K.
(2003) ‘International Competition Policy
Co-operation’, in
Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann
and
Mark A. Pollack
(eds) Transatlantic Economic Disputes, pp.
281-296.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
39.
Milner, Helen
(1997) Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic
Politics and Information.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
40.
Milner, Helen
(1998)
‘Rationalizing Politics: The Emerging Synthesis of International,
American, and Comparative Politics’
, International Organization52(4):
759-786
.
41.
Mitchell, D.
(2001)
‘International Institutions and Janus Faces: The Influence of
International Institutions on Central Negotiators within Two-Level Games’
, International Negotiation6(1):
25-48
.
42.
Moe, Terry
(1984)
‘The New Economics of Organization’
, American Journal of Political Science28(4):
739-777
.
43.
Monti, Mario
(2000)
‘Cooperation between Competition Authorities: A Vision for the Future’
, Speech at the Japan Foundation Conference,
Washington, DC, 23 June.
44.
Monti, Mario
(2001)
‘Prospects for Transatlantic Competition Policy’
, Speech at the Institute for International Economics, Whitman
International Lecture Series, Washington, DC,
30 March.
45.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1999)
‘A New Statecraft? Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation’
, International Organization53(2):
267-306
.
46.
Odell, John
(2000) Negotiating the World Economy.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
47.
Parisi, John J.
(1999)
‘Enforcement Co-operation Among Antitrust Authorities’
, European Competition Law Review20(3):
133-142
.
48.
Parker, Richard G.
(1999)
‘Global Merger Enforcement’
, Speech at the International Bar Association,
Barcelona, Spain, 28 September.
49.
Patterson, Lee Ann
(1997)
‘Agricultural Reform in the European Community: A Three-Level
Game Analysis’
, International Organization51(1):
135-167
.
50.
Pollack, Mark
(1998) ‘The Engines of Integration?
Supranational Autonomy and Influence in the European Union’,
in
Alec Stone Sweet
and
Wayne Sandholtz
(eds) European Integration and Supranational Governance, pp.
217-249.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
51.
Pollack, Mark A.
(2002)
‘Learning from the Americanists (Again): Theory and Method in the
Study of Delegation’
, West European Politics25(1):
200-219
.
52.
Putnam, Robert
(1988)
‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games’
, International Organization42(3):
427-460
.
53.
Raiffa, Howard
,
John Richardson
and
David Metcalfe
(2002) Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of
Collaborative Decision Making.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
54.
Stark, Charles S.
(2000)
‘Improving Bilateral Antitrust Cooperation’
, Speech at Conference on Competition Policy in the Global Trading
System, University of Oklahoma College of Law and Center for Global
Partnership-Japan Foundation, Washington, DC,
23 June.
55.
Thatcher, Mark
and
Alec Stone Sweet
(2002)
‘Theory and Practice of Delegation to Non-Majoritarian Institutions’
, West European Politics25(1):
1-22
.
56.
UNCTAD
(2000) World Investment Report 2000: Cross-border Mergers and
Acquisitions and Development.
Geneva: United Nations
.
57.
Waverman, Leonard
,
William S. Comanor
and
Akira Goto
(eds) (1997) Competition Policy in the Global Economy:
Modalities for Cooperation.
New York: Routledge
.
58.
Weingast, Barry R.
and
Mark J. Moran
(1983)
‘Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control: Regulatory
Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission’
, Journal of Political Economy91:
765-800
.
59.
Young, Alasdair
(2002) Extending European Cooperation: The European Union and
the ‘New’ International Trade Agenda.
Manchester: Manchester University Press
.
60.
Zeng, Ka
(2002)
‘Trade Structure and the Effectiveness of America’s
“Aggressively Unilateral” Trade Policy’
, International Studies Quarterly46(1):
93-115
.
