Bleiker, Roland
(2000) Popular Dissent, Human Agency and Global
Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
2.
Deudney, Daniel
(2000)
‘Regrounding Realism’
, Security Studies10(1):
1-45
.
3.
Emirbayer, Mustafa
and
Ann Mische
(1998)
‘What is Agency?’
, American Journal of Sociology103(4):
962-1023
.
4.
Gilbert, Margaret
(1989) On Social Facts.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
5.
Kupperman, Joel
(2000)
‘How Values Congeal Into Facts,’Ratio13(1):
37-53
.
6.
Ortner, Sherry
(2001)
‘Specifying Agency: The Comaroffs and their Critics’
, Interventions3(1):
76-84
.
7.
Pettit, Philip
(2003)
‘Agency-Freedom and Option-Freedom’
, Journal of Theoretical Politics15(4):
387-403
.
8.
Schueler, G.F.
(2003) Reasons and Purposes: Human Rationality and the
Teleological Explanation of Action.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
9.
Sending, Ole Jacob
(2002)
‘Constitution, Choice and Change: Problems with the
“Logic of Appropriateness” and its Use in Constructivist Theory’
, European Journal of International Relations8(4):
443-470
.
10.
Thalos, Mariam
(1999)
‘Degrees of Freedom in the Social World’
, Journal of Political Philosophy7(4):
453-477
.
11.
Wendt, Alexander
(1999) Social Theory of International Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
12.
Wendt, Alexander
(2003)
‘Why a World State is Inevitable’
, European Journal of International Relations9(4):
491-542
.
13.
Wendt, Alexander
(2004)
‘The State as Person in International Theory’
, Review of International Studies30(2):
289-316
.
14.
Wendt, Alexander
(2005) ‘Social Theory as Cartesian Science: An
Auto-Critique from a Quantum Perspective’, in
Stefano Guzzini
and
Anna Leander
(eds) Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and
his Critics.
London: Routledge
, forthcoming.
15.
Wight, Colin
(1999)
‘They Shoot Dead Horses Don’t They? Locating Agency in
the Agent-Structure Problematique’
, European Journal of International Relations5(1):
109-142
.
