When officials from different countries disagree about trade policy, some say
‘see you in Geneva!’ meaning ‘see you in
court!’ In offering a pluralist alternative to this centralism of analysts
and practitioners, I represent the World Trade Organization (WTO) not as a coercive
court used for enforcement but as a site for the elaboration of a system of
‘law’ that arises from and provides a framework for
self-directed human interaction. Trade law is shaped in the shadow of bargaining. I
contrast this legal representation with ‘legalization’ to show
the contribution it makes to constructivist international theory. An empirical probe
in the contentious domain of the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary
Measures (SPS) asks about the relative importance of the few formal SPS
‘disputes’ compared with other ways that WTO law affects global
food safety. A discussion of how the trading system responded to ‘mad cow
disease’ (BSE) provides empirical confirmation of pluralist insights. Far
from being only in Geneva, trade law is everywhere.
Abbott, Kenneth W.
,
Robert Keohane
,
Andrew Moravcsik
,
Anne-Marie Slaughter
and
Duncan Snidal
(2000)
‘The Concept of Legalization’
, International Organization54(3):
401-419
.
2.
Alvarez, Jose E.
(2001) ‘Constitutional Interpretation in
International Organizations’, in
Jean-Marc Coicaud
and
Veijo Heiskanen
(eds) The Legitimacy of International Organizations, pp.
104-154.
Tokyo and New York: United Nations University Press
,.
3.
Atik, Jeffrey
and
David A. Wirth
(2003)
‘Science and International Trade: Third Generation Scholarship’
, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review26:
171-182
.
4.
Bogart, W.A.
(2002) Consequences: The Impact of Law and its
Complexity.
Toronto: University of Toronto Press
.
5.
Brunnée, Jutta
and
Stephen J. Toope
(2000)
‘International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an
Interactional Theory of International Law’
, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law39(1):
19-74
.
6.
Busch, Marc L.
and
Eric Reinhardt
(2002) ‘Testing International Trade Law:
Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement’, in
Daniel L.M. Kennedy
and
James D. Southwick
(eds) The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor
of Robert E. Hudec, pp. 457-481.
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
.
7.
Chayes, Abram
and
Antonia Handler Chayes
(1995) The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International
Regulatory Norms.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
8.
Cottier, Thomas
(2001) ‘Risk Management Experience in WTO
Dispute Settlement’, in
David Robertson
and
Aynsley J. Kellow
(eds) Globalization and the Environment: Risk Assessment and the
WTO, pp. 41-62.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
.
9.
Ellickson, Robert C.
(1991) Order Without Law: How Neighbours Settle
Disputes.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
10.
Finnemore, Martha
and
Stephen J. Toope
(2001)
‘Alternatives to “Legalization”: Richer Views
of Law and Politics’
, International Organization55(3):
743-758
.
11.
Freeman, Jody
(1999) ‘Private Parties, Public Functions and
the New Administrative Law’, in
David Dyzenhaus
(ed.) Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order, pp.
331-369.
Oxford: Hart
.
12.
Fuller, Lon L.
(1940) The Law in Quest of Itself.
Chicago, IL: The Foundation Press
.
13.
Fuller, Lon L.
(1963)
‘Collective Bargaining and the Arbitrator’
, Wisconsin Law Review:
3-46
.
14.
Fuller, Lon L.
(1969a)
‘Human Interaction and the Law’
, American Journal of Jurisprudence14(1):
1-36
.
15.
Fuller, Lon L.
(1969b) The Morality of Law, rev. edn.New Haven and London: Yale University Press
.
16.
Fuller, Lon L.
(1981) ‘The Forms and Limits of
Adjudication’, in
Kenneth Winston
(ed.) The Principles of Social Order, pp.
86-124.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press
.
17.
Goldstein, Judith
and
Lisa Martin
(2000)
‘Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A
Cautionary Note’
, International Organization54(3):
603-632
.
18.
Goldstein, Judith
,
Miles Kahler
,
Robert Keohane
and
Anne-Marie Slaughter
(2000)
‘Introduction: Legalization and World Politics’
, International Organization54(3):
385-399
.
19.
Hart, Henry Melvin
and
Albert M. Sacks
. Prepared for publication from the 1958 tentative edition by, and containing
an introductory essay by, William N. Eskridge, Jr and Philip P. Frickey
(1994) The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and
Application of LawWestbury, NY: Foundation Press
.
20.
Higgins, Rosalyn
(1994) Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use
It.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
21.
Holmes, Peter
,
Jim Rollo
and
Alasdair R. Young
(2003) ‘Emerging Trends in WTO Dispute Settlement:
Back to the GATT?’World Bank
: Policy Research Working Paper 3133. September 2003.
22.
Howse, Robert
(2001) ‘The Legitimacy of the World Trade
Organization’, in
Jean-Marc Coicaud
and
Veijo Heiskanen
(eds) The Legitimacy of International Organizations, pp.
355-407.
Tokyo and New York: United Nations University Press
.
23.
Howse, Robert
and
Kalypso Nicolaidis
(2003)
‘Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization or Global Subsidiarity?’
, Governance16(1):
73-94
.
24.
Jackson, John H.
(1997) The World Trading System: Law and Policy of
International Economic Relations, 2nd edn.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
25.
Jutras, Daniel
(2001)
‘Legal Dimensions of Everyday Life’
, Canadian Journal of Law and Society16(1):
45-65
.
26.
Kennedy, David
(1994)
‘The International Style in Postwar Law and Policy’
, Utah Law Review7(1):
7-118
.
27.
Keohane, Robert O.
(1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World
Political Economy.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
28.
Kerr, William A.
and
Jill E. Hobbs
(2002)
‘The North American-European Union Dispute over Beef Produced
Using Growth Hormones: A Major Test for the New International Trade Regime’
, The World Economy25(2):
282-296
.
29.
Kingsbury, Benedict
(1998)
‘The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions
of International Law’
, Michigan Journal of International Law19:
345-372
.
30.
Koh, Harold Hongju
(1997)
‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’
, The Yale Law Journal106:
2599-2659
.
31.
Komesar, Neil K.
(1994) Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions in Law,
Economics, and Public Policy.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
32.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V.
(1989) Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of
Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic
Affairs.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
33.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V.
(2000) ‘How Do Norms
Matter?’, in
Michael Byers
(ed.) The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International
Relations and International Law, pp. 35-68.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
34.
Kratochwil, Friedrich
and
John Gerard Ruggie
(1986)
‘International Organization: A State of the Art on the Art of the State’
, International Organization40(4):
753-775
.
35.
Leitner, K.
and
S. Lester
(2004)
‘WTO Dispute Settlement 1995-2003: A Statistical Analysis’
, Journal of International Economic Law7(1):
169-181
.
36.
Macdonald, Roderick A.
(1998)
‘Metaphors of Multiplicity: Civil Society, Regimes, and Legal Pluralism’
, Arizona Journal of Comparative and International Law15(1):
69-91
.
37.
Macdonald, Roderick A.
(1999) ‘Legislation and
Governance’, in
William J. Witteveen
and
Wibren van der Burg
(eds) Rediscovering Fuller: Essays on Implicit Law and Institutional
Design, pp. 279-311.
Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press
.
38.
Macdonald, Roderick A.
(2001)
‘The Fridge-Door Statute’
, McGill Law Journal47(11):
11-38
.
39.
Macdonald, Roderick A.
(2002) Lessons of Everyday Law.
Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s
University Press for the School of Policy Studies and the Law Commission of Canada
.
40.
Macdonald, Roderick A.
(2003) ‘The Legal Mediation of Social
Diversity’, in
Alain-G. Gagnon
,
Montserrat Guibernau
and
François Rocher
(eds) The Conditions of Diversity in Multinational Democracies,
pp. 85-111.
Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy
.
41.
Macdonald, Roderick A.
(2005) ‘Here, There, and Everywhere: Theorizing
the Legal Pluralism of Jacques Vanderlinden’, in
Mélanges Jacques Vanderlinen.
Bruxelles: Bruylant
.
42.
McRae, D.
(2004)
‘What Is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?’
, Journal of International Economic Law7(1):
3-21
.
43.
Marabelli, R.
,
G. Ferri
and
S. Bellini
(1999)
‘Management of Animal Health Emergencies: General Principles and
Legal and International Obligations’
, Revue Scientifique et Technique de L’Office International
des Epizooties18(1):
21-29
.
44.
Mnookin, Robert H.
and
Lewis Kornhauser
(1979)
‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce’
, Yale Law Journal88:
950-997
.
45.
OECD
(2004) The Impact of Regulations on Agro-Food Trade: The
Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) and Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)
Agreements.
Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development
.
46.
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood
(1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory
and International Relations.
Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press
.
47.
Ostry, Sylvia
(1999) ‘The Future of the World Trade
Organization’, in
Susan M. Collins
and
Robert Z. Lawrence
(eds) Brookings Trade Forum, 1999, pp.
167-204.
Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
.
48.
Pauwelyn, Joost
(2001) ‘Applying SPS in WTO
Disputes’, in
David Robertson
and
Aynsley J. Kellow
(eds) Globalization and the Environment: Risk Assessment and the
WTO, pp. 63-78.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
.
49.
Petersmann, Ernst Ulrich
(1998)
‘How to Promote the International Rule of Law? Contributions by
the World Trade Organization Appellate Review System’
, Journal of International Economic Law1(1):
25-48
.
50.
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich
(2003) ‘Prevention and Settlement of
Transatlantic Economic Disputes: Legal Strategies for EU/US
Leadership’, in
Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann
and
Mark A. Pollack
(eds) Transatlantic Economic Disputes: The EU, the US, and the
WTO, pp. 3-64.
Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press
.
51.
Phillips, Peter W.B.
(2001) ‘Food Safety, Trade Policy and
International Institutions’, in
Peter W.B. Phillips
and
Robert Wolfe
(eds) Governing Food: Science, Safety, and Trade, pp.
27-48.
Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s
University Press for the School of Policy Studies
.
52.
Poulin, Denis
and
Attah K. Boame
(2003) ‘Mad Cow Disease and Beef Trade.’Statistics Canada
: Analytical Paper 5 November 2003.
53.
Quick, Reinhard
and
Andreas Bluthner
(1999)
‘Has the Appellate Body Erred? An Appraisal and Criticism of the
Ruling in the WTO Hormones Case’
, Journal of International Economic Law2(4):
603-639
.
54.
Raustiala, Kal
and
Anne-Marie Slaughter
(2002) ‘International Law, International
Relations and Compliance’, in
Walter Carlsnaes
,
Beth A. Simmons
and
Thomas Risse-Kappen
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
538-558.
London: Sage
.
55.
Rose, Andrew K.
(2002) ‘Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases
Trade?’,
Centre for Economic Policy Research
, 2002. http://www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP3538.asp
56.
Ruggie, John Gerard
(1983) ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and
Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’,
in
Stephen D. Krasner
(ed.) International Regimes, pp. 195-231.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
57.
Steinberg, Richard H.
(2002)
‘In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and
Outcomes in the GATT/WTO’
, International Organization56(2):
239-262
.
58.
Subramanian, Arvind
and
Shang-Jin Wei
(2003) ‘The WTO Promotes Trade, Strongly but
Unevenly’, NBER Working Paper No. 10024, October 2003.
59.
Trebilcock, Michael J.
and
Julie A. Soloway
(2002) ‘International Trade Policy and Domestic
Food Safety Regulation: The Case for Substantial Deference by the WTO Dispute
Settlement Body under the SPS Agreement’, in Daniel L.M.
Kennedy and James D. Southwick The Political Economy of International Trade
Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec,
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
.
60.
USITC
(2003) ‘The Impact of Trade Agreements: Effect of
the Tokyo Round, US-Israel FTA, US-Canada FTA, NAFTA, and the Uruguay Round on
the US Economy’,
US International Trade Commission
: Investigation No. TA-2111-1, August 2003.
61.
Victor, David G.
(2000)
‘The Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement of the World Trade
Organization: An Assessment after Five Years’
, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics32(4):
865-937
.
62.
Waincymer, Jeff
(2002) WTO Litigation: Procedural Aspects of Formal Dispute
Settlement.
London: Cameron May
.
63.
Walker, Vern R.
(2003)
‘The Myth of Science as a “Neutral Arbiter”
for Triggering Precautions’
, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review26:
197-228
.
64.
Witteveen, William J.
and
Wibren van der Burg
(eds) (1999) Rediscovering Fuller: Essays on Implicit Law and
Institutional Design.
Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press
.
65.
Wolfe, Robert
(2003)
‘Regulatory Transparency, Developing Countries, and the WTO’
, World Trade Review2(2):
157-182
.
66.
Wolfe, Robert
(2005) ‘Where’s the Beef? Law,
Institutions and the Canada-U.S. Border’, in
Thomas. J. Courchene
,
Donald J. Savoie
and
Daniel Schwanen
(eds) Thinking North America, No. 6, pp.
69-98.
Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy
.
67.
WTO
(1998) WTO Agreement on Sanitary & Phytosanitary
Measures.
Geneva: World Trade Organization
.
68.
WTO
(2000) ‘Summary Report on the SPS Risk Analysis
Workshop, 19-20 June 2000’,
Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, World Trade Organization
: G/SPS/GEN/209, 3 November 2000.
69.
WTO
(2001) ‘International Standard on Bovine Spongiform
Encephalopathy (BSE) — Submission by the Office International Des
Epizooties (OIE)’,
Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, World Trade Organization
: G/SPS/GEN/230, 28 February 2001.
70.
WTO
(2002) ‘Establishment of National WTO TBT/SPS
Enquiry Point’,
Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, World Trade Organization
: G/SPS/ GEN/349, 24 October 2002.
71.
WTO
(2003a) Annual Report 2003.
Geneva: World Trade Organization
.
72.
WTO
(2003b) ‘Implementing the Standards of the OIE:
Communication from the OIE.
Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures’, World
Trade Organization
: G/SPS/GEN/437, 28 October 2003.
73.
WTO
(2003c) ‘“Necessity Tests” in
the WTO’,
Working Party on Domestic Regulation, World Trade Organization
: S/WPDR/W/27, 2 December 2003.
74.
WTO
(2003d) Update of WTO Dispute Settlement Cases.
WT/DS/OV/17, 28 November 2003.
75.
WTO
(2004a) ‘Review of the Agreement on the Application
of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures — Proposal for Consideration:
Submission by the United States’,
Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, World Trade Organization
: G/SPS/W/163, 21 October 2004.
76.
WTO
(2004b) ‘Review of the Operation and Implementation
of the SPS Agreement: Background Document’,
Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, World Trade Organization
: G/SPS/GEN/510, 20 September 2004.
77.
WTO
(2004c) ‘Specific Trade Concerns’,
Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, World Trade Organization
: G/SPS/GEN/204/Rev.4, 2 March 2004.
78.
WTO
(2004d) World Trade Report 2004: Exploring the Linkage
between the Domestic Policy Environment and International Trade.
Geneva: World Trade Organization
.
