Constructivists attack the social theory of Kenneth Waltz’s Theory of
International Politics (TIP), arguing its positions on change,
agent-structure interaction and culture are irrevocably flawed. We argue that many
of these criticisms are mispecified, as they overlook the
structural-functionalist assumptions of Waltz’s theory. Seen in
this light, structural realism specifies mechanisms of change, provides a plausible
account of agent-structure interaction; and is less
‘materialist’ and ‘rationalist’ than its
critics suppose. Most fundamentally, recognizing Waltz’s sociological
commitments reinforces his insight that reductionist theories cannot account for
international order. An appreciation of TIP’s
structural-functionalist sensibilities also helps us to understand the flaws of the
theory, and provides constructivists with a clearer departure point for a
reformulated systems theory of international politics.
Abbott, Andrew
(1996)
‘Things of Boundaries’
, Social Research62:
857-862
.
2.
Adler, Emmanuel
(1997)
‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’
, European Journal of International Relations3(3):
319-363
.
3.
Adler, Emmanuel
(1998) ‘Seeds of Peaceful Change: The
OSCE’s Security Community-Building Model’, in
Emmanuel Adler
and
Michael Barnett
(eds) Security Communities, pp. 119-160.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
4.
Alexander, Jeffrey
(1988) Action and its Environments: Towards a New
Synthesis.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
5.
Alexander, Jeffrey
(1997) Classical Tradition in Sociology: The American
Tradition.
London: Sage
.
6.
Alexander, Jeffrey
(1998) Neofunctionalism and After.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
7.
Allison, Graham
(1971) Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile
Crisis.
Boston: Little, Brown
.
8.
Archer, Margaret
(1988) Culture and Agency.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
9.
Ashley, Richard
(1986) ‘The Poverty of
Neorealism’, in
Robert O. Koehane
(ed.) Neorealism and its Critics, pp.
255-300.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
10.
Banchoff, Thomas
(1999)
‘German Identity and European Integration’
, European Journal of International Relations5(3):
259-289
.
11.
Barber, Bernard
(1956)
‘Structural-Functional Analysis: Some Problems and Misunderstandings’
, American Sociological Review21(2):
129-135
.
12.
Barber, Bernard
(1994)
‘Talcott Parsons on the Social System: An Essay in Clarification
and Elaboration’
, Sociological Theory12(1):
101-105
.
13.
Barnett, Michael
(1999)
‘Culture, Strategy, and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s
Road to Oslo’
, European Journal of International Relations5(1):
5-36
.
14.
Berger, Thomas U.
(1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and National Security
in Germany and Japan’, in
Peter Katzenstein
(ed.) Culture of National Security, pp.
317-356.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
15.
Biersteker, Thomas
and
Cynthia Weber
(1996) State Sovereignty as Social Construct.
London: Cambridge University Press
.
16.
Blyth, M.
(2001) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and
Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
17.
Brown, Michael
,
Sean M. Lynn-Jones
and
Steven E. Miller
(eds) (1996) Debating the Democratic Peace.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
18.
Buckley, Walter
(1967) Sociology and Modern Systems Theory.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
.
19.
Buckley, Walter
(1968) ‘Society as a Complex Adaptive
System’, in
Walter Buckley
(ed.) Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, pp.
490-513.
Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company
.
20.
Bukovansky, Mlada
(2002) Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French
Revolutions in International Political Culture.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
21.
Bull, Hedley
(1977) The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World
Politics.
London: Macmillan
.
22.
Buzan, Barry
,
Charles Jones
and
Richard Little
(1993) The Logic of Anarchy.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
23.
Cederman, Lars-Erik
(2003)
‘Endogenizing Corporate Identities: The Next Step in
Constructivist IR Theory?’
, European Journal of International Relations9(1):
5-36
.
24.
Checkel, Jeffrey T.
(1997)
‘International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the
Rationalist-Constructivist Divide’
, European Journal of International Relations3(4):
473-492
.
25.
Checkel, Jeffrey T.
(1998)
‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’
, World Politics50(2):
324-348
.
26.
Checkel, Jeffrey T.
(1999)
‘Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe’
, International Studies Quarterly43(1):
83-114
.
27.
Chernoff, Fred
(1998)
‘Positional Versus Transformational Theory in International
Relations: Lessons from the Philosophy of Science?’
Manuscript presented at the Annual Meeting of the International
Studies Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
28.
Claude, Inis
(1962) Power and International Relations.
New York: Random House
.
29.
Coleman, James
(1990) Foundations of Social Theory.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
30.
Cox, Robert
(1986) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders:
Beyond International Relations Theory’, in
Robert S. Keohane
(ed.) Neorealism and its Critics, 204-254.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
31.
Christensen, Thomas J.
and
Jack Snyder
(1997)
‘Progressive Research on Degenerate Alliances’The American Political Science Review91(4):
919-922
.
32.
Desch, Michael
(1998)
‘Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies’
, International Security23(1):
141-170
.
33.
Dessler, David
(1989)
‘What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?’International Organization43(3):
441-473
.
34.
Duffield, John
(1999)
‘Political Culture and State Behavior: Why Germany Confounds Neorealism’
, International Organization53(4):
765-803
.
35.
Elman, Colin
(1996)
‘Horses for Courses: Why not Realist Theories of Foreign Policy?’
, Security Studies6(1):
7-53
.
36.
Elman, Colin
(1996)
‘Cause, Effect, and Consistency: A Response to Kenneth Waltz’
, Security Studies6(1):
58-61
.
37.
Elman, Colin
and
Miriam Elman
(1997)
‘Lakatos and Neorealism: A Reply to Vasquez’
, American Political Science Review91(4):
913-918
.
38.
Emirbayer, Mustafa
(1997)
‘Manifesto for a Relational Sociology’
, American Journal of Sociology103(2):
281-317
.
39.
Emirbayer, Mustafa
and
Jeffrey Goodwin
(1994)
‘Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency’
, American Journal of Sociology99(6):
1141-1154
.
40.
Finnemore, Martha
(1996) ‘Constructing Norms of Humanitarian
Intervention’, in
Peter Katzenstein
(ed.) Culture of National Security, pp.
153-185.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
41.
Finnemore, Martha
and
Katherine Sikkink
(1998)
‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’
, International Organization52(4):
887-917
.
42.
Firth, Raymond
(1954)
‘Social Organization and Social Change’
, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland84(1/2):
1-20
.
43.
Fortes, Meyer
(1949) ‘Time and Social Structure: An Ashanti
Case Study’, in
Meyer Fortes
(ed.) Social Structure: Studies Presented to A.R. Radcliffe-Brown,
pp. 1-32.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
44.
Fortes, Meyer
(1966)
‘Totem and Taboo’
, Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great
Britain and Ireland (1966):
5-22
.
45.
Garfinkel, Alan
(1981) Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in
Social Theory.
New Haven, CN: Yale University Press
.
46.
Giddens, Anthony
(1990) The Consequences of Modernity.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
47.
Giddens, Anthony
(1995) A Contemporary Critique of Historical
Materialism, 2nd edition.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
48.
Gilpin, Robert
(1981) War and Change in World Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
49.
Gregor, James
(1968)
‘Political Science and the Use of Functional Analysis’
, American Political Science Review62(2):
425-439
.
50.
Grunberg, Isabelle
(1990)
‘Exploring the “Myth” of Hegemonic Stability’
, International Organization44(4):
431-477
.
51.
Guzzini, Stefanno
(1998). Realism in International Relations and International
Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold, 2nd
edition.
New York: Routledge
.
52.
Haas, Ernst
(1968) The Uniting of Europe.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
53.
Haas, Peter
(1990) Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of
International Environmental Cooperation.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
54.
Hall, Rodney Bruce
(1999) National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and
International Systems.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
55.
Hemmer, Christopher
and
Peter Katzenstein
(2002)
‘Why is there no NATO inAsia? Collective Identity, Regionalism,
and the Origins of Multilateralism’
, International Organization56(3):
575-607
.
56.
Hollis, Martin
and
Steven Smith
(1990) Explaining and Understanding International
Relations.
Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press
.
57.
Hollis, Martin
and
Steven Smith
(1991)
‘Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations’
, Review of International Studies17(4):
393-410
.
58.
Homans, George
(1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms.
New York: Harcourt
.
59.
Hopf, Ted
(2000)
‘Constructivism All the Way Down’
, International Politics37:
369-378
.
60.
Hoppman, P. Terrance
(1998)
‘Complexity and Uncertainty in International Systems’
, Mershon International Studies Review42(2):
313-316
.
61.
Hui, Victoria Tin-bor
(2004)
‘Towards a Dynamic Theory of International Politics: Insights
from Comparing Ancient China and Early Modern Europe’
, International Organization58(1):
175-205
.
62.
Hurd, Ian
(1999)
‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’
, International Organization53(2):
379-408
.
63.
Ikenberry, G. John
(2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and
the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
64.
Jackson, Patrick T.
and
Daniel Nexon
(1999)
‘Relations Before States: Substance, Process, and the Study of
World Politics’
, European Journal of International Relations5(3):
291-332
.
65.
Jackson, Patrick T.
and
Daniel Nexon
(2001)
‘Whence Causal Mechanisms? A Comment on Legro’
, Dialoge-IO1(1):
1-21
. <http://mitpress.mit.edu/journals/Inor/Dialogue_IO/jackson_nexxon.pdf>.
66.
Janowtiz, Morris
(1963)
‘Anthropology and the Social Sciences’
, Current Anthropology4(2):
139, 149-154
.
67.
Jervis, Robert
(1997) Systems Effects: Complexity in Political and Social
Life.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
68.
Kaplan, Morton
(1957) System and Process in International Politics.
New York: Wiley
.
69.
Keck, Margaret
and
Katherine Sikkink
(1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in
International Politics.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
70.
Keohane, Robert O.
(1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World
Political Economy.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
71.
Keohane, Robert O.
(1986) ‘Theory of World Politics: Structural
Realism and Beyond’, in
R. Keohane
(ed.) Neorealism and its Critics, pp.
158-203.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
72.
Keohane, Robert O.
(1989) International Institutions and State Power: Essays in
International Relations Theory.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press
.
73.
Keohane, Robert O.
(1993) ‘Institutional Theory and the Realist
Challenge After the Cold War’, in
David Baldwin
(ed.) Neorealism and Neoliberalism, pp.
269-300.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
74.
Keohane, Robert O.
and
Lisa L. Martin
(1995)
‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’
, International Security20(1):
39-51
.
75.
Keohane, Robert O.
and
Joseph Nye
(1989) Power and Interdependence, 2nd edition.
New York: HarperCollins
.
76.
King, Gary
,
Robert O. Keohane
and
Sidney Verba
(1994) Designing Social Inquiry.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
77.
Krasner, Stephen
(1983) ‘Structural Causes and Regime
Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, in
Stephen Krasner
(ed.) International Regimes, pp. 1-22.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
78.
Krasner, Stephen
(1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
79.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V.
(1993)
‘The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of
Realpolitik without Politics’
, Review of International Studies19(1):
63-80
.
80.
Lake, David
(1999) Entangling Relations: United States Foreign Policy in
its Century.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
81.
Lapid, Yosef
(1996) ‘Culture’s Ship: Returns and
Departures in International Relations Theory’, in
Y. Lapid
and
F. Kratochwil
(eds) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, pp.
3-20.
Boulder, CO: Lynn Reiner
.
82.
Leach, Edmund R.
(1958)
Reviews: 178
. Man58:
132-133
.
83.
Lebow, Richard N.
(1994)
‘The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism’
, International Organization48(2):
249-277
.
84.
Legro, Jeffrey W.
(2000)
‘Whence American Internationalism?’
, International Organization54(2):
253-289
.
85.
Legro, Jeffrey W.
and
Andrew Moravcsik
(1999)
‘Is Anyone Still a Realist?’
, International Security24(2):
5-55
.
86.
Little, Richard
(1999)
‘Historiography and International Relations’
, Review of International Studies25(2):
291-299
.
87.
Markey, Daniel
(1999).
‘Prestige and the Origins of War: Returning to
Realism’s Roots’
, Security Studies8(4):
126-173
.
88.
Mayhew, Leon H.
(1982) ‘Introduction’, in
L. H. Mayhew
(ed.) Talcott Parsons: On Institutions and Social Evolution, pp.
1-62.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
89.
Mearsheimer, John J.
(1990)
‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’
, International Security15(1):
5-56
.
90.
Mearsheimer, John J.
(1994/1995)
‘False Promise of International Institutions’
, International Security19(3):
5-49
.
91.
Mearsheimer, John J.
(2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics.
New York: W.W. Norton
.
92.
Milner, Helen
(1992)
‘International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths
and Weaknesses’
, World Politics44(3):
466-496
.
93.
Milner, Helen
(1993) ‘The Assumption of Anarchy in
International Relations Theory: A Critique’, in
David Baldwin
(ed.) Neorealism and Neoliberalism, pp.
143-169.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
94.
Milner, Helen
(1997) Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic
Politics and International Relations.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
95.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1993)
‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal
Governmentalist Approach’
, Journal of Common Market Studies31(4):
473-452
.
96.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1997)
‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’
, International Organization51(4):
513-554
.
97.
Morgenthau, Hans
(1973) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and
Peace.
New York: Alfred A. Knopf
.
98.
Morrow, James D.
(1988)
‘Social Choice and System Structure in World Politics’
, World Politics41(1):
75-97
.
99.
Nadel, Siegried F.
(1957) The Theory of Social Structure.
Glencoe, IL: Free Press
.
100.
Nagel, Ernest
(1952)
‘Whole, Sums, and Organic Unities’
, Philosophical Studies3(2):
17-32
.
101.
Owen, John M.
(1997) Liberal Peace, Liberal War: American Politics and
International Security.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
102.
Oye, Kenneth
(ed.) (1986) Cooperation Under Anarchy.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
103.
Parsons, Talcott
(1948)
‘The Position of Sociological Theory’
, American Sociological Review13(2):
156-171
.
104.
Parsons, Talcott
(1951) The Social System.
New York: Free Press
.
105.
Parsons, Talcott
(1954) Essays in Sociological Theory, revised
edition.
New York: Free Press
.
106.
Parsons, Talcott
(1968a) The Structure of Social Action: Volume I.
New York: Free Press
.
107.
Parsons, Talcott
(1968b) The Structure of Social Action: Volume II.
New York: Free Press
.
108.
Parsons, Talcott
(1982) On Institutions and Social Evolution,
Leon H. Mayhew
(ed.).
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Press
.
109.
Parsons, Talcott
and
Edward B. Shils
(1951) ‘Values, Motives, and Systems of
Action’, in Toward a General Theory of Action.
New York: Harper and Row
.
110.
Petrova, Margarita H.
(2003)
‘The End of the Cold War: A Battle or Bridging Ground Between
Rationalist and Ideational Approaches to International Relations?’
, European Journal of International Relations9(1):
115-163
.
111.
Philpott, Daniel
(2000)
‘The Religious Roots of Modern International Relations’
, World Politics54:
206-245
.
112.
Philpott, Daniel
(2001) Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern
International Relations.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
113.
Reiss, H. S.
(1970) ‘Introduction’, in
H. S. Reiss
(ed.) Kant: Political Writings, 2nd edition, pp.
1-40.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
114.
Reus-Smit, Christian
. (1997)
‘The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the
Nature of Fundamental Institutions’
, International Organization51(4):
555-589
.
115.
Ringer, Fritz
(1997) Max Weber’s Methodology: The Unification of
the Cultural and Social Sciences.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
116.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas
(1996) ‘Collective Identity in a Democratic
Community: The Case of NATO’, in
Peter Katzenstein
(ed.) Culture of National Security, pp.
357-399.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
117.
Rosecrance, Richard
and
Janice Stein
(1993) The Domestic Bases of Grand Strategy.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
118.
Ruggie, John G.
(1986) ‘Continuity and Transformation in the
World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis’, in
Robert O. Keohane
(ed.) Neorealism and its Critics, pp.
131-157.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
119.
Ruggie, John G.
(1993)
‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in
International Relations’
, International Organization47(1):
139-174
.
120.
Ruggie, John G.
(1998a) Constructing the World Polity.
New York: Routledge
.
121.
Ruggie, John G.
(1998b)
‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the
Social Constructivist Challenge’
, International Organization52(4):
855-885
.
122.
Russett, Bruce
(1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
123.
Schweller, Randall
(1994)
‘Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In’
, International Security19(1):
72-107
.
124.
Schweller, Randall
(1997)
‘ New Realist Research on Alliances: Refining, Not Refuting
Waltz’s Balancing Proposition’
, American Political Science Review91(4):
913-918
.
125.
Scott, John P.
(2000) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.
New York: Sage
.
126.
Sending, Ole Jacob
(2002)
‘Constitution, Choice and Change: Problems with the
“Logic of Appropriateness” and its Use in Constructivist Theory’
, European Journal of International Relations8(4):
443-470
.
127.
Simmel, Georg
(1971) On Individuality and Social Forms.
Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press
.
128.
Snyder, Glenn
(2002)
‘Mearsheimer’s World: Offensive Realism and the
Struggle for Security’
, International Security27(1):
149-173
.
129.
Snyder, Jack L.
(2002)
‘Anarchy and Culture: Insights from the Anthropology of War’
, International Organization56(1):
7-45
.
130.
Spruyt, Hendrik
(1994) The Sovereign State and its Competitors.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
131.
Spruyt, Hendrik
(1998)
‘Historical Sociology and Systems Theory in International Relations’
, Review of International Political Economy5(2):
340-353
.
132.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer
(2002)
‘Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and
Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared’
, International Studies Quarterly44(1):
97-119
.
133.
Taliaferro, Jeffrey
(2000/2001)
‘Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited’
, International Security25(3):
129-161
.
134.
Tellis, A.
(1997)
‘Reconstructing Political Realism: The Long March to Scientific Theory’
, Security Studies5(3):
1-94
.
135.
Tilly, Charles
(1997) Roads from Past to Future.
New York: Rowman & Littlefield
.
136.
Tilly, Charles
(1998) ‘International Communities, Secure or
Otherwise’, in
Emmanuel Adler
and
Michael Barnett
(eds) Security Communities, pp. 397-412.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
137.
Vasquez, John
(1997)
‘The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive
Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on
Waltz’s Balancing Proposition’
, American Political Science Review91(4):
899-912
.
138.
Wæver, Ole
(1998) ‘Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity in
the Western Non-War Community’, in
Emmanuel Adler andMichael Barnett
(eds) Security Communities, pp. 69-118.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
139.
Wallerstein, Immanuel
(1979) The Capitalist World-Economy.
New York: Cambridge University Press
.
140.
Waltz, Kenneth
(1979) Theory of International Politics.
New York: McGraw-Hill
.
141.
Waltz, Kenneth
(1986) ‘Reflections on Theory of International
Politics: A Reply to My Critics’, in
Robert O. Keohane
(ed.) Neorealism and its Critics, pp.
322-346.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
142.
Waltz, Kenneth
(1996)
‘International Politics is not Foreign Policy’
, Security Studies6(1):
54-57
.
143.
Waltz, Kenneth
(1997)
‘Evaluating Theories’
, American Political Science Review91(4):
913-918
.
144.
Waltz, K.
(2002) ‘The Continuity of International
Politics’, in
Ken Booth
and
Tim Dunne
(eds) Worlds in Collision, pp. 348-353.
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
145.
Watzlawick, P.
,
J. Beavin
and
D. Jackson
(1967) Pragmatics of Human Communication.
New York: Norton
.
146.
Weber, Max
(1949) ‘ “Objectivity” in
Social Science and Social Policy’, in
Edward A. Shils
and
Henry A. Finch
(eds) Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences,
50-84.
New York: Free Press
.
147.
Weiner, N.
(1961) Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the
Animal and Machine, 2nd edition.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
148.
Wendt, Alexander
(1987)
‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’
, International Organization41(3):
335-370
.
149.
Wendt, Alexander
(1991)
‘Bridging the Theory/Meta-Theory Gap in International Relations’
, Review of International Studies17(4):
383-392
.
150.
Wendt, Alexander
(1992)
‘Anarchy is What States Make of it’
, International Organization46(2):
391-425
.
151.
Wendt, Alexander
(1994)
‘Collective Identity Formation and the International State’
, American Political Science Review88:
384-396
.
152.
Wendt, Alexander
(1996) ‘Identity and Structural Change in
International Politics’, in
Yosef Lapid
and
Freidrich V. Kratochwil
(eds) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, pp.
47-64.
Boulder, CO: Lynn Reiner
.
153.
Wendt, Alexander
(1999) Social Theory of International Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
154.
Wendt, Alexander
(2003)
‘Why a World State is Inevitable’
, European Journal of International Relations9(4):
491-542
.
155.
White, Harrison
(1992) Identity and Control.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
156.
Wohlforth, William C.
(1999)
‘The Stability of a Unipolar World’
, International Security24(1):
5-41
.
157.
Wohlforth, William C.
(2001)
‘The Russian-Soviet Empire: A Test of Neorealism’
, Review of International Studies27:
213-235
.
158.
Wohlforth, William C.
(2002)
‘Hierarchy, Status and War’
, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political
Science Association, 29 August-11 September,
Boston, MA.
159.
Wrong, Denis
(1961)
‘The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology’
, American Sociological Review26(2):
183-193
.
