The agent-structure debate has proceeded in International Relations for some time now. Within an initial `first wave' of debate, this revolved around proposing various `solutions' to the problem of how to appreciate the mutually constitutive relationship between agency and structure. The ensuing debate was then characterized by an apparent intellectual cul-de-sac. There were always `two stories to tell' about agency and structure — one an explanatory account, the other an interpretative account. More recently, a `second wave' of agent-structure debate is under way in which the stakes have been raised. Yet throughout the various waves of debate it seems that the contributions of an historicist neo-Gramscian perspective developed by Robert Cox have been overlooked. This article explores some of the issues raised by such an approach. Attention is drawn to the many issues developed by neo-Gramscian perspectives that combine accounts of agency-structure as well as modes of explanation and understanding. We remain sceptical about whether the dualism of agency-structure can be successfully transcended by combining accounts that both explain and understand the social world. As such, the problem of agency-structure may well be a Gordian knot that cannot be unravelled or solved. Yet, by starting to take seriously the approaches to agency-structure within various neo-Gramscian perspectives, we aim to propel discussion into further avenues within the second wave of the agent-structure debate.
Amoore, Louise
, Richard Dodgson, Randall Germain, Barry Gills, Paul Langley and Iain Watson (2000) `Paths to a Historicized International Political Economy', Review of International Political Economy7(1): 53-71.
2.
Archer, Margaret
(1982) `Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action', British Journal of Sociology33(4): 455-483.
3.
Archer, Margaret
(1990) `Human Agency and Social Structure: A Critique of Giddens', in Jon Clark, Celia Modgil and Sohan Modgil (eds) Anthony Giddens: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press.
4.
Archer, Margaret
(1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bieler, Andreas
(2000) Globalization and Enlargement of the EU: Austrian and Swedish Social Forces in the Struggle over Membership. London: Routledge.
6.
Bieler, Andreas
and Adam David Morton (eds) (2001, forthcoming) Social Forces in the Making of the New Europe: The Restructuring of European Social Relations in the Global Political Economy. London: Palgrave.
7.
Burch, Kurt
and Robert A. Denemark (eds) (1997) Constituting International Political Economy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
8.
Carlsnaes, Walter
(1992) `The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis', International Studies Quarterly36(3): 245-270.
9.
Carlsnaes, Walter
and Steve Smith (eds) (1994) European Foreign Policy: The EC and Changing Perspectives in Europe. London: Sage.
10.
Chan, Stephen
(1998) `An Ontologist Strikes Back: A Further Response to Hollis and Smith', Review of International Studies24(3): 441-443.
11.
Clark, William Roberts
(1998) `Agents and Structures: Two Views of Preferences, Two Views of Institutions', International Studies Quarterly42(2): 245-270.
12.
Cox, Robert W.
(1976/1996) `On Thinking About Future World Order', in Robert W. Cox with Timothy J. Sinclair, Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Cox, Robert W.
(1981) `Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations', Millennium10(2): 126-155.
14.
Cox, Robert W.
(1983) `Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method', Millennium, 12(2): 162-175.
15.
Cox, Robert W.
(1985/1996) `Realism, Positivism and Historicism', in Robert W. Cox with Timothy J. Sinclair, Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Cox, Robert W.
(1987) Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
Cox, Robert W.
(1989) `Production, the State and Change in World Order', in Ernst-Otto Czempiel and James N. Rosenau (eds) Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
18.
Cox, Robert W.
(1992a) `Global Perestroika', in Ralph Miliband and Leo Panitch (eds) Socialist Register 1992: New World Order?London: Merlin Press.
19.
Cox, Robert W.
(1992b/1996) `Towards a Posthegemonic Conceptualization of World Order: Reflections on the Relevancy of Ibn Khaldun', in Robert W. Cox with Timothy J. Sinclair, Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Cox, Robert W.
(1992c/1996) `Multilateralism and World Order', in Robert W. Cox with Timothy J. Sinclair, Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Cox, Robert W.
(1995) `Critical Political Economy', in Björn Hettne (ed.) International Political Economy: Understanding Global Disorder. London: Zed Books.
22.
Cox, Robert W.
with Timothy J. Sinclair (1996) Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Davies, Matt
(1999) International Political Economy and Mass Communication in Chile: National Intellectuals and Transnational Hegemony. London: Macmillan.
24.
Dessler, David
(1989) `What's At Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?', International Organization43(3): 441-473.
25.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn
(1997) `Aporia: A Critical Exploration of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory', European Journal of International Relations3(3): 365-392.
26.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn
(1999) `A Reply to Colin Wight', European Journal of International Relations5(3): 387-390.
27.
Femia, Joseph V.
(1998) The Machiavellian Legacy: Essays in Italian Political Thought. London: Macmillan.
28.
Germain, Randall D.
and Michael Kenny (1998) `Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians', Review of International Studies24(1): 3-21.
29.
Giddens, Anthony
(1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
Gill, Stephen
(1990) American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Gill, Stephen
(ed.) (1993) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Gill, Stephen
(1995) `Globalization, Market Civilization and Disciplinary Neoliberalism', Millennium24(3): 399-423.
33.
Gill, Stephen
and David Law (1988) The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems and Policies. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
34.
Gill, Stephen
and David Law (1989) `Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital', International Studies Quarterly33(4): 475-499.
35.
Gould, Harry D.
(1998) `What Is at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?', in Vendulka Kubálková, Nicholas Onuf and Paul Kowert (eds) International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
36.
Gramsci, Antonio
(1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey-Nowell Smith. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
37.
Gramsci, Antonio
(1977) Selections from Political Writings, 1910-1920, ed. Quintin Hoare, trans. John Matthews. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
38.
Gramsci, Antonio
(1978) Selections from Political Writings, 1921-1926, ed. and trans. Quintin Hoare. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
39.
Gramsci, Antonio
(1994) Letters from Prison, Vol. 1, ed. Frank Rosengarten, trans. Raymond Rosenthal. New York: Columbia University Press.
40.
Gramsci, Antonio
(1995) Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. Derek Boothman. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
41.
Hall, Stuart
(1986) `The Problem of Ideology — Marxism Without Guarantees', Journal of Communication Inquiry10(2): 28-44.
42.
Hay, Colin
(1995) `Structure and Agency', in David Marsh and Gerry Stoker (eds) Theory and Methods in Political Science. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
43.
Hay, Colin
and David Marsh (1999) `Introduction: Towards a New (International) Political Economy', New Political Economy4(1): 5-22.
44.
Hollis, Martin
and Steve Smith (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
45.
Hollis, Martin
and Steve Smith (1991) `Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations', Review of International Studies17(4): 393-410.
46.
Hollis, Martin
and Steve Smith (1992) `Structure and Action: Further Comment', Review of International Studies18(2): 187-188.
47.
Hollis, Martin
and Steve Smith (1994) `Two Stories About Structure and Agency', Review of International Studies20(3): 241-251.
48.
Hollis, Martin
and Steve Smith (1996) `A Response: Why Epistemology Matters in International Theory', Review of International Studies22(1): 111-116.
49.
Holman, Otto
(1996) Integrating Southern Europe: EC Expansion and the Transnationalization of Spain. London: Routledge.
50.
Jabri, Vivienne
and Stephen Chan (1996) `The Ontologist Always Rings Twice: Two More Stories About Structure and Agency in Reply to Hollis and Smith', Review of International Studies22(1): 107-110.
51.
Jacobitti, Edmund E.
(1983) `From Vico's Common Sense to Gramsci's Hegemony', in Giorgio Tagliacozzo (ed.) Vico and Marx: Affinities and Contrasts. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
52.
Katzenstein, Peter J.
, Robert O. Keohane and Stephen D. Krasner (1998) `International Organization and the Study of World Politics', International Organization52(4): 645-685.
53.
Keohane, Robert O.
(1989) `International Institutions: Two Approaches', in Robert O. Keohane (ed.) International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
54.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V.
(1989) Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Kubálková, Vendulka
, Nicholas Onuf and Paul Kowert (eds) (1998) International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
56.
Lee, Kelly
(1995) `A neo-Gramscian Approach to International Organization: An Expanded Analysis of Current Reforms to UN Development Agencies', in John Macmillan and Andrew Linklater (eds) Boundaries in Question: New Directions in International Relations. London: Pinter.
57.
McSweeney, Bill
(1999) Security, Identity and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Mittelman, James H.
(1998) `Coxian Historicism as an Alternative Perspective in International Studies', Alternatives23(1): 63-92.
59.
Morton, Adam David (2000) `Mexico in the Global Political Economy: Contesting the Construction of Hegemony', PhD dissertation, University of Wales, Aberystwyth.
60.
Onuf, Nicholas
(1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
61.
Onuf, Nicholas
(1997) `A Constructivist Manifesto', in Kurt Burch and Robert A. Denemark (eds) Constituting International Political Economy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
62.
Robinson, William I.
(1996) Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, US Intervention and Hegemony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Ruggie, John Gerard
(1998) Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.
64.
Rupert, Mark
(1995a) Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
Rupert, Mark
(1995b) `(Re)Politicizing the Global Economy: Liberal Common Sense and Ideological Struggle in the US NAFTA Debate', Review of International Political Economy2(4): 658-692.
66.
Smith, Steve
(2000) `Wendt's World', Review of International Studies26(1): 151-163.
67.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer
(2000) `Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared', International Studies Quarterly44(1): 97-119.
68.
Stienstra, Deborah
(1994) Women's Movements and International Organizations. London: Macmillan.
69.
Suganami, Hidemi
(1999) `Agents, Structures, Narratives', European Journal of International Relations5(3): 365-386.
70.
Taylor, Ian (1999) `Hegemony, “Common Sense” and Compromise: A neo-Gramscian Analysis of Multilateralism in South Africa's Post-Apartheid Foreign Policy.' PhD dissertation, University of Stellenbosch.
71.
Tooze, Roger
and Craig N. Murphy (1996) `The Epistemology of Poverty and the Poverty of Epistemology: Mystery, Blindness and Invisibility', Millennium25(3): 681-707.
72.
van Apeldoorn, Bastian
(1997) `Structure and Agency in the Construction of European Order: Gramscian Transnationalism as an Approach to the Study of European Integration', mimeo, paper prepared for the 22nd Annual Conference of the British International Studies Association, Leeds, 15-17 December.
73.
van der Pijl, Kees
(1998) Transnational Classes and International Relations. London: Routledge.
74.
Vico, Giambattista
(1744/1984) The New Science of Giambattista Vico, trans. from the Third Edition (1744) with the addition of `Practic of the New Science' by Thomas Goddard Bergin and Max Harold Fisch. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
75.
Wallerstein, Immanuel
(1974) The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the Modern World Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
76.
Waltz, Kenneth N.
(1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
77.
Wendt, Alexander
(1987) `The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations', International Organization41(3): 335-370.
78.
Wendt, Alexander
(1991) `Bridging the Theory/Meta-Theory Gap in International Relations', Review of International Studies17(4): 383-392.
79.
Wendt, Alexander
(1992a) `Levels of Analysis vs Agents and Structures: Part III', Review of International Studies18(2): 181-185.
80.
Wendt, Alexander
(1992b) `Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics', International Organization46(2): 393-425.
81.
Wendt, Alexander
(1994) `Collective Identity Formation and the International State', American Political Science Review88(2): 384-396.
82.
Wendt, Alexander
(1995a) `Constructing International Politics', International Security20(1): 71-81.
83.
Wendt, Alexander
(1995b) `Identity and Structural Change in International Politics', in Yosef Lapid and Friedrich Kratochwil (eds) The Return of Culture and Identity in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
84.
Wendt, Alexander
(1998) `On Constitution and Causation in International Relations', Review of International Studies24(Special Issue): 101-117.
85.
Wendt, Alexander
(1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86.
Wendt, Alexander
(2000) `On the Via Media: A Response to the Critics', Review of International Studies26(1): 165-180.
87.
Wendt, Alexander
and Daniel Friedheim (1995) `Hierarchy Under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State', International Organization49(4): 689-721.
88.
Wendt, Alexander
and Ian Shapiro (1997) `The Misunderstood Promise of Realist Social Theory', in Kristen Renwick Monroe (ed.) Contemporary Empirical Political Theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
89.
Whitworth, Sandra
(1994) Feminism and International Relations: Towards a Political Economy of Gender in Interstate and Non-Governmental Institutions. London: Macmillan.
90.
Wight, Colin
(1999) `They Shoot Dead Horses Don't They? Locating Agency in the Agent-Structure Problematique', European Journal of International Relations5(1): 109-142.
91.
Wight, Colin
(2000) `Interpretation All the Way Down? A Reply to Roxanne Lynn Doty', European Journal of International Relations6(3): 423-430.
