Differential Validity in the Written,Oral,and Electronic SDMT in Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract

Background:

Cognitive decline in multiple sclerosis (MS) is commonly assessed using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). However, the written (wSDMT), oral (oSDMT), and electronic (eSDMT) versions may display differing psychometric properties, despite often being used interchangeably.

Objective:

The objective of the study is to compare the wSDMT, oSDMT, and eSDMT, including inter-test reliability, and to assess demographic and motor disability influences on test performance.

Methods:

In this within-subjects study, 85 participants with MS completed all three SDMT versions. Statistical analyses included assessment of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and sequential multiple regression modeling.

Results:

The three SDMT versions demonstrated good inter-test reliability (ICC = 0.77) and similar mean scores (range: 53.5–56.2). Scores on all three test versions declined with age (p < 0.05), but the decline was significantly steeper in the eSDMT. Education correlated with eSDMT but not wSDMT or oSDMT scores. Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) scores predicted performance across all versions, while 9HPT times predicted only wSDMT and eSDMT scores (p < 0.01).

Conclusion:

The wSDMT and eSDMT show signs of motor disability influence, while the eSDMT displays the greatest sensitivity to the influences of age and education. This differential construct validity necessitates SDMT version-specific normative data and motor-adjustments for accurate cognitive assessment in MS.

Keywords

SDMT multiple sclerosis cognition processing speed aging education outcome measurement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sumowski

Benedict

Enzinger

, et al. Cognition in multiple sclerosis: State of the field and priorities for the future. Neurology 2018; 90: 278–288.

Nabizadeh

Balabandian

Rostami

, et al. Association of cognitive impairment and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional study. Curr J Neurol 2022; 21: 144–150.

Costa

Genova

DeLuca

, et al. Information processing speed in multiple sclerosis: Past, present, and future. Mult Scler 2017; 23(6): 772–789.

Benedict

DeLuca

Phillips

, et al. Validity of the symbol digit modalities test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2017; 23(5): 721–733.

Lopez-Gongora

Querol

Escartin

. A one-year follow-up study of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: An appraisal of comparative longitudinal sensitivity. BMC Neurol 2015; 15: 40.

Sandry

Simonet

Brandstadter

, et al. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is sensitive but non-specific in MS: Lexical access speed, memory, and information processing speed independently contribute to SDMT performance. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 51: 102950.

Meca-Lallana

Gascón-Giménez

Ginestal-López

, et al. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: Diagnosis and monitoring. Neurol Sci 2021; 42(12): 5183–5193.

Chen

Chiaravalloti

Genova

, et al. Visual and motor confounds on the symbol digit modalities test. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 45: 102436.

Low

Crewther

Ong

, et al. Compromised motor dexterity confounds processing speed task outcomes in stroke patients. Front Neurol 2017; 8: 484.

10.

Bruce

Arnett

. Mild visual acuity disturbances are associated with performance on tests of complex visual attention in MS. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2007; 13(3): 544–548.

11.

Smith

. Symbol digit modalities test. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services, 1973.

12.

Strober

Bruce

Arnett

, et al. A new look at an old test: Normative data of the symbol digit modalities test - Oral version. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2020; 43: 102154.

13.

Pham

Harris

Varosanec

, et al. Smartphone-based symbol-digit modalities test reliably captures brain damage in multiple sclerosis. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4: 36.

14.

Middleton

Pearson

Ingram

, et al. A rapid electronic cognitive assessment measure for multiple sclerosis: Validation of cognitive reaction, an electronic version of the symbol digit modalities test. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e18234.

15.

De Meo

Portaccio

Giorgio

, et al. Identifying the distinct cognitive phenotypes in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2021; 78: 414–425.

16.

Landmeyer

Burkner

Wiendl

, et al. Disease-modifying treatments and cognition in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis. Neurology 2020; 94: e2373–e2383.

17.

Hochstrasser

Rieder

Jufer-Riedi

, et al. Computerized symbol digit modalities test in a Swiss pediatric cohort part 1: Validation. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 631536.

18.

van Oirschot

Heerings

Wendrich

, et al. Symbol digit modalities test variant in a smartphone app for persons with multiple sclerosis: Validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8: e18160.

19.

Messinis

Bakirtzis

Kosmidis

, et al. Symbol digit modalities test: Greek normative data for the oral and written version and discriminative validity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2021; 36: 117–125.

20.

Costa

Schwizer Ashkenazi

Strober

, et al. The adapted symbol digit modalities test: Examining the impact of response modality. Neurorehabilitation 2021; 49(2): 215–220.

21.

Kiely

Butterworth

Watson

, et al. The symbol digit modalities test: Normative data from a large nationally representative sample of Australians. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2014; 29(8): 767–775.

22.

Kurtzke

. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33(11): 1444–1452.

23.

Thompson

Banwell

Barkhof

, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 162–173.

24.

Rao

Losinski

Mourany

, et al. Processing speed test: Validation of a self-administered, iPad((R))-based tool for screening cognitive dysfunction in a clinic setting. Mult Scler 2017; 23: 1929–1937.

25.

Koo

. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155–163.

26.

R and Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2023.

27.

Strober

DeLuca

Benedict

, et al. Symbol digit modalities test: A valid clinical trial endpoint for measuring cognition in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2019; 25(13): 1781–1790.

28.

Ryan

Woods

Britt

, et al. Normative data for the symbol digit modalities test in older white Australians and Americans, African-Americans, and Hispanic/Latinos. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 2020; 4: 313–323.

29.

Borrelli

Pereira Lima

Dachy

. The relation between the symbol digit modalities test, fatigue, depression, and anxiety symptoms in a Belgian MS cohort. Acta Neurol Belg 2023; 123(6): 2147–2153.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.15 MB

0.23 MB