People living with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) are at risk of experiencing communication difficulties that can limit their vocational outcomes.
Objective:
To investigate clinical and cognitive variables that may contribute to communication restrictions in PwMS, and to evaluate how these factors affect vocational status.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study, 502 PwMS underwent clinical and cognitive assessment tasks and were administered self-reported measures assessing fatigue and mood. The communication and language assessment questionnaire for persons with multiple sclerosis (CLAMS) was also administered.
Results:
Performance in information processing speed (p < 0.001), the presence of dysarthria (p < 0.001) and levels of self-reported fatigue (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of communication difficulties. Higher levels of communication difficulties were associated with a higher risk of unemployment and allowance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.649, p < 0.001 and 0.749, p < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion:
Cognitive deficits, high levels of fatigue and the presence of dysarthria may independently contribute to communication difficulties in PwMS regardless of disease type or disability levels. These factors are associated with poorer vocational outcomes, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to support effective communication and improve employment prospects for this population.
El-WahshSBogaardtHKumforF, et al. Development and validation of the communication and language assessment questionnaire for persons with multiple sclerosis (CLAMS). Mult Scler Relat Disord2020; 43: 102206.
2.
SmithKMCaplanDN. Communication impairment in Parkinson’s disease: Impact of motor and cognitive symptoms on speech and language. Brain Lang2018; 185: 38–46.
3.
PlotasPNanousiVKantanisA, et al. Speech deficits in multiple sclerosis: A narrative review of the existing literature. Eur J Med Res2023; 28(1): 252.
4.
De BiagiFHeikkolaLMNordioS, et al. Update on recent developments in communication and swallowing in multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care2020; 22(6): 270–275.
5.
DuffyJR. Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. 4th ed.Edinburgh; London; New York; Oxford: Elsevier, 2020.
6.
AkmajianADemerRFarmerA, et al. Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication. 5th ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001.
7.
ChiaravallotiNDDeLucaJ. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol2008; 7(12): 1139–1151.
8.
HalsteadEJStanleyJFioreD, et al. Impact of cognitive impairment on adults with multiple sclerosis and their family caregivers. Int J MS Care2021; 23(3): 93–100.
9.
KhanFAmatyaBGaleaM. Management of fatigue in persons with multiple sclerosis. Front Neurol2014; 5: 177.
10.
BlaneyBELowe-StrongA. The impact of fatigue on communication in multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil2009; 31(3): 170–180.
11.
SilveiraCGuedesRMaiaD, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms of multiple sclerosis: State of the art. Psychiatry Investig2019; 16(12): 877–888.
12.
PolychroniadouEBakirtzisCLangdonD, et al. Validation of the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) in Greek population with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord2016; 9: 68–72.
13.
VlahouCHKosmidisMHDardaganiA, et al. Development of the Greek Verbal Learning Test: Reliability, construct validity, and normative standards. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2013; 28(1): 52–64.
14.
DimitriouNNasiosGNousiaA, et al. Adaptation and validation of the Greek version of the communication and language assessment questionnaire for persons with multiple sclerosis (CLAMS). Arch Clin Neuropsychol2024; 2024: acae015.
15.
BakalidouDVoumvourakisKTsourtiZ, et al. Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale in multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Rehabil Res2014; 37(3): 271–276.
16.
BeckATSteerRABrownGK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory: Fast screen for medical patients. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2003.
El-WahshSHeardRBogaardtH, et al. Variables associated with self-reported language impairment in multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care2021; 23(2): 85–92.
19.
YorkstonKMBaylorCAmtmannD. Communicative participation restrictions in multiple sclerosis: Associated variables and correlation with social functioning. J Commun Disord2014; 52: 196–206.
20.
DemirS. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in multiple sclerosis. Cam Sakura Med J2022; 2(3): 82–89.
21.
RodgersJDTjadenKFeenaughtyL, et al. Influence of cognitive function on speech and articulation rate in multiple sclerosis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2013; 19(2): 173–180.
22.
FriedovaLRuszJMotylJ, et al. Slowed articulation rate is associated with information processing speed decline in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. J Clin Neurosci2019; 65: 28–33.
23.
GrotheMDominMHoffeldK, et al. Functional representation of the symbol digit modalities test in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord2020; 43: 102159.
24.
FeenaughtyLTjadenKWeinstock-GuttmanB, et al. Separate and combined influence of cognitive impairment and Dysarthria on functional communication in multiple sclerosis. Am J Speech Lang Pathol2018; 27(3): 1051–1065.
25.
HarteliusLBurge JohanssonÅA, et al. How does fatigue affect communication?Int J MS Care2004; 6(2): 39–51.
26.
YorkstonKMKlasnerERSwansonKM. Communication in context: A qualitative study of the experiences of individuals with multiple sclerosis. Am J Speech Lang Pathol2001; 10(2): 126–137.
27.
KobeltGThompsonABergJ, et al. New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe. Mult Scler J2017; 23(8): 1123–1136.
28.
ClemensLLangdonD. How does cognition relate to employment in multiple sclerosis? A systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord2018; 26: 183–191.
29.
KavaliunasADanylaite KarrenbauerVGyllenstenH, et al. Cognitive function is a major determinant of income among multiple sclerosis patients in Sweden acting independently from physical disability. Mult Scler2019; 25(1): 104–112.
30.
BaylorCYorkstonKBamerA, et al. Variables associated with communicative participation in people with multiple sclerosis: A regression analysis. Am J Speech Lang Pathol2010; 19(2): 143–153.
31.
van der HieleKSpliethoff-KammingaNGRuimschotelRP, et al. The relationship between self-reported executive performance and psychological characteristics in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol2012; 19(4): 562–569.
32.
NtoskouKMessinisLNasiosG, et al. Cognitive and language deficits in multiple sclerosis: Comparison of relapsing remitting and secondary progressive subtypes. Open Neurol J2018; 12: 19–30.
33.
El-WahshSLayfieldCBogaardtH, et al. Perspectives from the patient: A content analysis of communication changes, impact, and strategies to facilitate communication in multiple sclerosis. Int J Speech Lang Pathol2022; 24(2): 173–189.
34.
MackenzieCKellySPatonG, et al. The living with Dysarthria group for post-stroke dysarthria: The participant voice. Int J Lang Commun Disord2013; 48(4): 402–420.
