We need to engage representative patients’ community rather than “expert patients” to increase impact of research in the era of personalized medicine: No
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2025
We need to engage representative patients’ community rather than “expert patients” to increase impact of research in the era of personalized medicine: No
BrettJStaniszewskaSMockfordC, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: A systematic review. Health Expect2014; 17(5): 637–650.
2.
EsmailLMooreEReinA. Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: Moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res2015; 4(2): 133–145.
3.
DonisiVPoliSMazziMA, et al. Promoting participatory research in chronicity: The ESPRIMO biopsychosocial intervention for young adults with multiple sclerosis. Front Psychol2022; 13: 1042234.
4.
OclooJMatthewsR. From tokenism to empowerment: Progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf2016; 25(8): 626–632.
5.
KlingmannIHeckenbergAWarnerK, et al. EUPATI and patients in medicines research and development: Guidance for patient involvement in ethical review of clinical trials. Front Med2018; 5: 251.
6.
SudauFFriedeTGrabowskiJ, et al. Sources of information and behavioral patterns in online health forums: Observational study. J Med Internet Res2014; 16(1): e10.
7.
ErdmannARehmann-SutterCBozzaroC. Patients’ and professionals’ views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: A mixed research synthesis. BMC Med Ethics2021; 22(1): 116.
8.
Robles-SanchezMACruz-DíazVAmil-BujanP, et al. An expert patient program as a tool to empower people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs2020; 52(4): 166–171.
9.
Robles-SanchezMAAmil-BujanPBosch-FarréC, et al. An expert patient program to improve the empowerment and quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis: Protocol for a multicenter pre-post intervention study. Front Neurol2023; 14: 1172640.
