SeglenPO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ1997; 314: 498–502.
5.
IoannidisJPABerkwitsMFlanaginA, et al. Tenth International Congress on peer review and scientific publication: Call for abstracts. JAMA2024; 332: 1434–1436.
6.
HansonMABarreiroPGCrosettoP, et al. The strain on scientific publishing. arXiv [preprint], 2024. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.15884.
7.
GrudniewiczAMoherDCobeyKD, et al. Predatory journals: No definition, no defence. Nature2019; 576(7786): 210–212.
8.
BergJMBhallaNBournePE, et al. SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY. Preprints for the life sciences. Science2016; 352: 899–901.
9.
ConroyG. How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing. Nature2023; 622(7982): 234–236.
10.
DrozdzJALadomeryMR. The peer review process: Past, present, and future. Br J Biomed Sci2024; 81: 12054.