LamersIFeysPSwinnenE. Robot-assisted rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Overview of approaches, clinical outcomes, and perspectives. In: ColomboRSanguinetiV (eds) Rehabilitation robotics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018, pp. 253–266.
2.
BowmanTGervasoniEAmicoAP, et al. What is the impact of robotic rehabilitation on balance and gait outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis? A systematic review of randomized control trials. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2021; 57(2): 246–253.
3.
CalabroRSCassioAMazzoliD, et al. What does evidence tell us about the use of gait robotic devices in patients with multiple sclerosis? A comprehensive systematic review on functional outcomes and clinical recommendations. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2021; 57(5): 841–849.
4.
LefeberNDe BuyzerSDassenN, et al. Energy consumption and cost during walking with different modalities of assistance after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil2020; 42(12): 1650–1666.
5.
DuddyDDohertyRConnollyJ, et al. The effects of powered exoskeleton gait training on cardiovascular function and gait performance: A systematic review. Sensors2021; 21(9): 3207.
6.
WeeSKHoCYTanSL, et al. Enhancing quality of life in progressive multiple sclerosis with powered robotic exoskeleton. Mult Scler2021; 27(3): 483–487.
7.
FeysPSwinnenE. Powered exoskeletons for walking in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2021; 27(3): 487–488.
8.
De KeersmaeckerELefeberNGeysM, et al. Virtual reality during gait training: Does it improve gait function in persons with central nervous system movement disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroRehabilitation2019; 44(1): 43–66.
9.
SwinnenELefeberNWillaertW, et al. Motivation, expectations, and usability of a driven gait orthosis in stroke patients and their therapists. Top Stroke Rehabil2017; 24(4): 299–308.
10.
Fernandez-VazquezDCano-de-la-CuerdaRGor-Garcia-FogedaMD, et al. Wearable robotic gait training in persons with multiple sclerosis: A satisfaction study. Sensors2021; 21(14): 4940.
