SparacoMLavorgnaLConfortiR, et al. The role of wearable devices in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Int2018; 2018: 7627643.
2.
BrichettoGPedullàLPoddaJ, et al. Beyond center-based testing: understanding and improving functioning with wearable technology in MS. Mult Scler2019; 25(10): 1402–1411.
3.
MarziniakMBrichettoGFeysP, et al. The use of digital and remote communication technologies as a tool for multiple sclerosis management: narrative review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol2018; 5(1): e5.
4.
WitchelHJOberndorferCNeedhamR, et al. Thigh-derived inertial sensor metrics to assess the sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transitions in the timed up and go (TUG) task for quantifying mobility impairment in multiple sclerosis. Front Neurol2018; 9: 684.
5.
BrichettoGZaratinP.Measuring outcomes that matter most to people with multiple sclerosis: the role of patient-reported outcomes. Curr Opin Neurol2020; 33(3): 295–299.
6.
GreinerPSawkaAImisonE.Patient and physician perspectives on MSdialog, an electronic PRO diary in multiple sclerosis. Patient2015; Dec8(6): 541–550.
7.
YousefAJonzzonSSuleimanL, et al. Biosensing in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Med Devices2017; 14(11): 901–912.
8.
MajumderSMondalTDeenMJ.Wearable sensors for remote health monitoring. Sensors (Basel)2017; 17(1): 130.
9.
StaffordISKellermannMMossottoE, et al. A systematic review of the applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in autoimmune diseases. NPJ Digit Med2020; 3: 30.
10.
BlockVJLizéeACrabtree-HartmanE, et al. Continuous daily assessment of multiple sclerosis disability using remote step count monitoring. J Neurol2017; 264(2): 316–326.
