Impaired mobility is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Changes in gait have different causes and require individualised gait rehabilitation. A common and often early cause of mobility impairment is footdrop, inability to lift the foot during the swing phase of gait, with increased risk of falls, effortful walking and fatigue. Using literature review, we have characterised published data on footdrop treatment in MS, specifically functional electrical stimulation (FES) to better understand the reported outcomes relevant to the user. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of FES and how far it meets the needs of people with footdrop. Physiotherapy combined with FES may further enhance the benefits of FES. MS studies emphasise the value of maintaining activity levels in early MS but discussion on how to achieve this is lacking. We emphasise the value of qualitative measures to broaden our understanding and improve treatment and adherence and identify areas for further research. Supplementary video material illustrates key features of MS gait and its correction using FES and physiotherapy.
CooteSHoganNFranklinS. Falls in people with multiple sclerosis who use a walking aid: Prevalence, factors, and effect of strength and balance interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2013; 94(4): 616–621.
2.
PauMPMPilloniGCogheG, et al. What gait features influence the amount and intensity of physical activity in people with multiple sclerosis?BMC Neurology. Epub ahead of print 28January2020. DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.22011/v1.
3.
LaroccaNG. Impact of walking impairment in multiple sclerosis. Patient2011; 4(3): 189–201.
4.
GulickEEGoodmanS. Physical activity among people with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care2006; 8: 121–129.
5.
PetersonECChoCFinlaysonML. Fear of falling and associated activity curtailment among middle aged and older adults with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2007; 13: 1168–1175.
6.
BregmanDJHarlaarJMeskersCG, et al. Spring-like Ankle Foot Orthoses reduce the energy cost of walking by taking over ankle work. Gait Posture2012; 35(1): 148–153.
7.
ShefflerLRBaileySNChaeJ. Spatiotemporal and kinematic effect of peroneal nerve stimulation versus an ankle-foot orthosis in patients with multiple sclerosis: A case series. PM R2009; 1(7): 604–611.
8.
TaylorPNWilkinson HartIAKhanMS, et al. Correction of Footdrop Due to Multiple Sclerosis Using the STIMuSTEP Implanted Dropped Foot Stimulator. Int J MS Care2016; 18(5): 239–247.
9.
RenfrewLMPaulLMcFadyenA, et al. The clinical- and cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses for foot drop in Multiple Sclerosis: A multicentre randomized trial. Clin Rehabil2019; 33(7): 1150–1162.
10.
Miller RenfrewLLordACMcFadyenAK, et al. A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng2018; 5: 2055668318755071.
11.
KhuranaSRBerangerAGFelixER. Perceived Exertion Is Lower When Using a Functional Electrical Stimulation Neuroprosthesis Compared With an Ankle-Foot Orthosis in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Preliminary Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2017; 96(3): 133–139.
12.
MotlRWSandroffBM. Exercise as a Countermeasure to Declining Central Nervous System Function in Multiple Sclerosis. Clin Ther2018; 40(1): 16–25.
13.
BarrettCTaylorP. The effects of the odstock drop foot stimulator on perceived quality of life for people with stroke and multiple sclerosis. Neuromodulation2010; 13(1): 58–64.
14.
BulleyCMercerTHHooperJE, et al. Experiences of functional electrical stimulation (FES) and ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) for foot-drop in people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2015; 10(6): 458–467.
15.
DowningAVan RynDFeckoA, et al. Effect of a 2-week trial of functional electrical stimulation on gait function and quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care2014; 16(3): 146–152.
16.
EsnoufJETaylorPNMannGE, et al. Impact on activities of daily living using a functional electrical stimulation device to improve dropped foot in people with multiple sclerosis, measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Mult Scler2010; 16(9): 1141–1147.
17.
MayerLWarringTAgrellaS, et al. Effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait function and quality of life for people with multiple sclerosis taking dalfampridine. Int J MS Care2015; 17(1): 35–41.
18.
TaylorPBarrettCMannG, et al. A feasibility study to investigate the effect of functional electrical stimulation and physiotherapy exercise on the quality of gait of people with multiple sclerosis. Neuromodulation2014; 17(1): 75–84; discussion 84.
19.
van der LindenMLHooperJECowanP, et al. Habitual functional electrical stimulation therapy improves gait kinematics and walking performance, but not patient-reported functional outcomes, of people with multiple sclerosis who present with foot-drop. PLoS ONE2014; 9(8): e103368.
20.
Dixon-WoodsMCaversDAgarwalS, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology2006; 6: 35.
21.
MillerLRaffertyDPaulL, et al. The impact of walking speed on the effects of functional electrical stimulation for foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2016; 11(6): 478–483.
22.
DapulGBethouxF.Functional electrical stimulation for foot drop in multiple sclerosis. US Neurology2015; 11(1): 10–18.
23.
BarrettCLMannGETaylorPN, et al. A randomized trial to investigate the effects of functional electrical stimulation and therapeutic exercise on walking performance for people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2009; 15(4): 493–504.
24.
BurridgeJTaylorPHaganS, et al. Experience of clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator. Artif Organs1997; 21(3): 254–260.
25.
BurridgeJHElessiKPickeringRM, et al. Walking on an uneven surface: The effect of common peroneal stimulation on gait parameters and relationship between perceived and measured benefits in a sample of participants with a drop-foot. Neuromodulation2007; 10(1): 59–67.
26.
ShefflerLRHennesseyMTKnutsonJS, et al. Neuroprosthetic effect of peroneal nerve stimulation in multiple sclerosis: A preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2009; 90(2): 362–365.
27.
SteinRBEveraertDGThompsonAK, et al. Long-term therapeutic and orthotic effects of a foot drop stimulator on walking performance in progressive and nonprogressive neurological disorders. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2010; 24(2): 152–167.
28.
StreetTTaylorPSwainI. Effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation on walking speed, functional walking category, and clinically meaningful changes for people with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015; 96(4): 667–672.
29.
StreetTSingletonC. Five-year follow-up of a longitudinal cohort study of the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation for people with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care2018; 20(5): 224–230.
30.
TaylorPBurridgeJDunkerleyA, et al. Clinical audit of 5 years provision of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator. Artif Organs1999; 23(5): 440–442.
31.
HausmannJSweeney-ReedCMSobierayU, et al. Functional electrical stimulation through direct 4-channel nerve stimulation to improve gait in multiple sclerosis: A feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil2015; 12: 100.
32.
van der LindenMLScottSMHooperJE, et al. Gait kinematics of people with multiple sclerosis and the acute application of functional electrical stimulation. Gait Posture2014; 39(4): 1092–1096.
33.
SpringerSKhamisS. Effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord2017; 13: 4–12.
34.
MillerLRaffertyDPaulL, et al. A comparison of the orthotic effect of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator and the Walkaide functional electrical stimulation systems on energy cost and speed of walking in Multiple Sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2015; 10(6): 482–485.
35.
MillerLMcFadyenALordAC, et al. Functional electrical stimulation for foot drop in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect on gait speed. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2017; 98(7): 1435–1452.
36.
D’OrioVLFoleyFWArmentanoF, et al. Cognitive and motor functioning in patients with multiple sclerosis: Neuropsychological predictors of walking speed and falls. J Neurol Sci2012; 316(1-2): 42–46.
37.
AllaliGLaidetMAssalF, et al. Walking while talking in patients with multiple sclerosis: The impact of specific cognitive loads. Neurophysiol Clin2014; 44(1): 87–93.
38.
LeoneCPattiFFeysP. Measuring the cost of cognitive-motor dual tasking during walking in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2015; 21(2): 123–131.
39.
KempenJCde GrootVKnolDL, et al. Community walking can be assessed using a 10-metre timed walk test. Mult Scler2011; 17(8): 980–990.
40.
GervasoniEParelliRUszynskiM, et al. Effects of functional electrical stimulation on reducing falls and improving gait parameters in multiple sclerosis and stroke. PM R2017; 9(4): 339–347.
41.
ForsbergAAMNilsagårdY. The functional gait assessment in people with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care2017; 19(2): 66–72.
42.
ChangYJHsuMJChenSM, et al. Decreased central fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients after 8 weeks of surface functional electrical stimulation. J Rehabil Res Dev2011; 48(5): 555–564.
43.
PaulLRaffertyDYoungS, et al. The effect of functional electrical stimulation on the physiological cost of gait in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2008; 14(7): 954–961.
44.
Miller RenfrewLLordACWarrenJ, et al. Evaluating the effect of functional electrical stimulation used for foot drop on aspects of health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care2019; 21(4): 173–182.
45.
ProkopiusováTPavlikovaMMarkovaM, et al. Randomized comparison of functional electric stimulation in posturally corrected position and motor program activating therapy: Treating foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. Epub ahead of print 8 May 2020. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06104-3.
46.
RasovaKProchazkovaMTinteraJ, et al. Motor programme activating therapy influences adaptive brain functions in multiple sclerosis: Clinical and MRI study. Int J Rehabil Res2015; 38(1): 49–54.
47.
IbrahimITinteraJSkochA, et al. Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity in the corpus callosum of patients with multiple sclerosis: The effect of physiotherapy. Neuroradiology2011; 53(11): 917–926.
48.
RasovaKKrasenskyJHavrdovaE, et al. Is it possible to actively and purposely make use of plasticity and adaptability in the neurorehabilitation treatment of multiple sclerosis patients? A pilot project. Clin Rehabil2005; 19(2): 170–181.
49.
MatthewsPMJohansen-BergHReddyH. Non-invasive mapping of brain functions and brain recovery: Applying lessons from cognitive neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. Restor Neurol Neurosci2004; 22(3–5): 245–260.
50.
MorgenKKadomNSawakiL, et al. Training-dependent plasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain2004; 127(Pt. 11): 2506–2517.
51.
EveraertDGThompsonAKChongSL, et al. Does functional electrical stimulation for foot drop strengthen corticospinal connections. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2010; 24(2): 168–177.
52.
HeesenCBruceJGearingR, et al. Adherence to behavioural interventions in multiple sclerosis: Follow-up meeting report (AD@MS-2). Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin2015; 1: 2055217315585333.
53.
Latimer-CheungAEPiluttiLAHicksAL, et al. Effects of exercise training on fitness, mobility, fatigue, and health-related quality of life among adults with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review to inform guideline development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2013; 94(9): 1800–1828.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
