Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Several natural history studies on primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) patients detected a consistent heterogeneity in the rate of disability accumulation.

Objectives:

To identify subgroups of PPMS patients with similar longitudinal trajectories of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) over time.

Methods:

All PPMS patients collected within the MSBase registry, who had their first EDSS assessment within 5 years from onset, were included in the analysis. Longitudinal EDSS scores were modeled by a latent class mixed model (LCMM), using a nonlinear function of time from onset. LCMM is an advanced statistical approach that models heterogeneity between patients by classifying them into unobserved groups showing similar characteristics.

Results:

A total of 853 PPMS (51.7% females) from 24 countries with a mean age at onset of 42.4 years (standard deviation (SD): 10.8 years), a median baseline EDSS of 4 (interquartile range (IQR): 2.5–5.5), and 2.4 years of disease duration (SD: 1.5 years) were included. LCMM detected three different subgroups of patients with a mild (n = 143; 16.8%), moderate (n = 378; 44.3%), or severe (n = 332; 38.9%) disability trajectory. The probability of reaching EDSS 6 at 10 years was 0%, 46.4%, and 81.9% respectively.

Conclusion:

Applying an LCMM modeling approach to long-term EDSS data, it is possible to identify groups of PPMS patients with different prognosis.

Keywords

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis disability long-term trajectories clinical trials heterogeneity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lublin

Miller

Freedman

et al . Oral fingolimod in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (INFORMS): A phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 1075–1084.

Montalban

Hemmer

Rammohan

et al . Efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: Results of the phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled ORATORIO study. Neurology 2016; 86(Suppl. 16): S49.001.

Wolinsky

Narayana

O’Connor

et al . Glatiramer acetate in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: Results of a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo- controlled trial. Ann Neurol 2007; 61: 14–24.

Tremlett

Paty

Devonshire

. The natural history of primary progressive MS in British Columbia, Canada. Neurology 2005; 65: 1919–1923.

Confavreux

Vukusic

. Natural history of multiple sclerosis: A unifying concept. Brain 2006; 129: 606–616.

Koch

Kingwell

Rieckmann

et al . The natural history of primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2009; 73: 1996–2002.

Leray

Yaouanq

Le Page

et al . Evidence for a two-stage disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2010; 133: 1900–1913.

Stellmann

J-P

Neuhaus

Lederer

et al . Validating predictors of disease progression in a large cohort of primary-progressive multiple sclerosis based on a systematic literature review. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e92761.

Harding

Wardle

Moore

et al . Modelling the natural history of primary progressive multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015; 86: 13–19.

10.

Koch

Greenfield

Javizian

et al . The natural history of early versus late disability accumulation in primary progressive MS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015; 86: 615–621.

11.

Raghavan

Healy

Carruthers

et al . Progression rates and sample size estimates for PPMS based on the CLIMB study population. Mult Scler 2015; 21: 180–188.

12.

Butzkueven

Chapman

Cristiano

et al . MSBase: An international, online registry and platform for collaborative outcomes research in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 12: 769–774.

13.

Lublin

Reingold

Cohen

et al . Defining the clinical course of Multiple Sclerosis. The 2013 Revisions. Neurology 2014; 83: 278–286.

14.

Jung

Wickrama

. An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2008; 2: 302–317.

15.

Royston

Altman

. Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. Appl Stat 43: 429–467.

16.

Lawton

Tilling

Robertson

et al . A longitudinal model for disease progression was developed and applied to multiple sclerosis. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 1355–1365.

17.

Chio

Logroscino

Hardiman

et al . Prognostic factors in ALS: A critical review. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2009; 10: 310–323.

18.

Kremenchutzky

Rice

GPA

Baskerville

et al . The natural history of multiple sclerosis: A geographically based study 9: Observations on the progressive phase of the disease. Brain 2006; 129: 584–594.

19.

Wolinsky

Ponnada

O’Connor

et al . Glatiramer acetate in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: Results of a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Neurol 2007; 61: 14–24.

20.

Hawker

O’Connor

Freedman

et al . Rituximab in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: Results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Ann Neurol 2009; 66(4): 460–471.

21.

Khaleeli

Ciccarelli

Manfredonia

et al . Predicting progression in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: A 10-year multicenter study. Ann Neurol 2008; 63: 790–793.

22.

Kalincik

Vivek

Jokubaitis

et al . Sex as a determinant of relapse incidence and progressive course of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2013; 136(12): 3609–3617.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.37 MB

Long-term disability trajectories in primary progressive MS patients: A latent class growth analysis

Abstract

Background:

Objectives:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material