SimpsonSJrBlizzardLOtahalP. Latitude is significantly associated with the prevalence of multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2011; 82: 1132–1141.
2.
AlonsoAHernánMA. Temporal trends in the incidence of multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Neurology2008; 71: 129–135.
3.
RosatiG. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the world: An update. Neurol Sci2001; 22: 117–139.
4.
MelconMOGoldLCarraA. Argentine Patagonia: prevalence and clinical features of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2008; 14: 656–662.
5.
TaylorBVPearsonJFClarkeG. MS prevalence in New Zealand, an ethnically and latitudinally diverse country. Mult Scler2010; 16: 1422–1431.
6.
KurtzkeJF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology1983; 33: 1444–1452.
7.
RichardsonAKClarkeGSabelCE. Method for identifying eligible individuals for a prevalence survey in the absence of a disease register or population register. Intern Med J 20128; 42: 1207–1212.
8.
PolmanCHReingoldSCEdanG. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 Revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol2005; 58: 840–846.
9.
RoxburghRHSRSeamanSRMastermanT. Multiple sclerosis severity score: Using disability and disease duration to rate disease severity. Neurology2005; 64: 1144–1151.
10.
Lechner-ScottLKapposLHofmanM. Can the Expanded Disability Status Scale be assessed by telephone?Mult Scler2003; 9: 154–159.
