ScottTF. Multiple sclerosis relapse phenotype is an important, neglected, determinant of disease outcome. Yes. Mult Scler J2015; xx: xxx–x.
2.
LublinFD. Relapses do not matter in relation to long-term disability: no (they do). Mult Scler J2011; 17: 1415–1416.
3.
ConfavreuxCVukusicSAdeleineP. Early clinical predictors and progression of irreversible disability in multiple sclerosis: an amnesic process. Brain2003; 126: 770–782.
4.
ScalfariANeuhausADegenhardtA. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study 10: relapses and long-term disability. Brain2010; 133: 1914–1929.
5.
SkoogBTedeholmHRunmarkerB. Continuous prediction of secondary progression in the individual course of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord2014; 3: 584–592.
6.
Paz SoldánMMNovatnaMAbou ZeidN. Relapses and disability accumulation in progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurology2015; 84: 81–88.
7.
PortaccioEStromilloMLGorettiB. Neuropsychological and MRI measures predict short-term evolution in benign multiple sclerosis. Neurology2009; 73: 498–503.
8.
LangdonDWAmatoMPBoringaJ. Recommendations for a Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Mult Scler J2012; 18: 891–898.
9.
HutchinsonM. There is no such thing as a mild MS relapse. The mild relapse is an Anglo-Saxon delusion – commentary. Mult Scler J2012; 18: 930–931.
