FilippiMRoccaMABarkhofF. Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol2012; 11: 349–360.
2.
PetkauJReingoldSHeldU. Magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate outcome for multiple sclerosis relapses. Mult Scler2008;14: 770–778.
3.
SormaniMPBonzanoLRoccatagliataL. Magnetic resonance imaging as a potential surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis: A meta-analytic approach. Ann Neurol2009; 65: 268–275.
4.
SormaniMPBruzziP. Validation of MRI as a surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Lancet Neurol2013; 12: 669–676.
5.
SormaniMPStubinskiBCornelisseP. Magnetic resonance active lesions as individual-level surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2011; 17: 541–549.
6.
VerheyLHSignoriAArnoldDL. Clinical and MRI activity as determinants of sample size for pediatric multiple sclerosis trials. Neurology2013. [Epub ahead of Print; August 21, 2013 as 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a6cb9b].
7.
SormaniMPBonzanoLRoccatagliataL. Surrogate endpoints for EDSS worsening in multiple sclerosis: A meta-analytic approach. Neurology2010; 75: 302–309.
8.
BarkhofFCalabresiPMillerDH. Imaging outcomes for neuroprotection and repair in multiple sclerosis trials. Nat Rev Neurol2009; 5: 256–266.
9.
SormaniMPArnoldDLDe StefanoN. Treatment effect on brain atrophy correlates with treatment effect on disability in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol2013. doi: 10.1002/ana.24018.