Neuropsychological rehabilitation does not improve cognitive performance but reduces perceived cognitive deficits in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomised,controlled,multi-centre trial

Abstract

Background:

There is preliminary evidence on the positive effects of neuropsychological rehabilitation on cognition in multiple sclerosis (MS), but the generalisability of the findings is limited by methodological problems.

Objective:

The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of strategy-oriented neuropsychological rehabilitation on MS.

Methods:

A total of 102 relapsing–remitting MS patients with subjective and objective attentional deficits were randomised into an intervention and a control group. Neuropsychological assessments were performed at baseline, at three months immediately after the intervention, and at six months. Patients in the intervention group received neuropsychological rehabilitation once a week in 60-minute sessions for 13 consecutive weeks. The control group received no intervention.

Results:

Neuropsychological rehabilitation including computer-based attention and working memory retraining, psychoeducation, strategy learning and psychological support did not improve cognitive performance but had a positive effect on perceived cognitive deficits. The intervention group perceived significantly fewer deficits than the control group both immediately after the intervention and at six months. The personal rehabilitation goals were also well achieved.

Conclusions:

Strategy-oriented neuropsychological rehabilitation did not improve cognitive performance but reduced perceived cognitive deficits in MS.

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis MS neuropsychological rehabilitation attention perceived cognitive deficits effects

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Glanz

Holland

Gauthier

. Cognitive dysfunction in patients with clinically isolated syndromes or newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2007; 13: 1004–1010.

Chiaravalloti

DeLuca

Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 1139–1151.

Langdon

Cognition in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 2011; 24: 244–249.

DeLuca

Nocentini

Neuropsychological, medical and rehabilitative management of persons with multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabil 2011; 29: 197–217.

O’Brien

Chiaravalloti

Goverover

. Evidenced-based cognitive rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis: A review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 761–769.

Rosti-Otajärvi

Hämäläinen

Neuropsychological rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 11: 1–107.

Plohmann

Kappos

Ammann

. Computer assisted retraining of attentional impairments in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 64: 455–462.

Solari

Motta

Mendozzi

. Computer-aided retraining of memory and attention in people with multiple sclerosis: A randomized, double-blind controlled trial. J Neurol Sci 2004; 222: 99–104.

Vogt

Kappos

Calabrese

. Working memory training in patients with multiple sclerosis – comparison of two different training schedules. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2009; 27: 225–235.

10.

Mattioli

Stampatori

Zanotti

. Efficacy and specificity of intensive cognitive rehabilitation of attention and executive functions in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2010; 288: 101–105.

11.

Filippi

Riccitelli

Mattioli

. Multiple sclerosis: Effects of cognitive rehabilitation on structural and functional MR imaging measures – an explorative study. Radiology 2012; 262: 932–940.

12.

Brenk

Laun

Haase

Short-term cognitive training improves mental efficiency and mood in patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol 2008; 60: 304–309.

13.

Chiaravalloti

DeLuca

Moore

. Treating learning impairments improves memory performance in multiple sclerosis: A randomized clinical trial. Mult Scler 2005; 11: 58–68.

14.

Hildebrandt

Lanz

Hahn

. Cognitive training in MS: Effects and relation to brain atrophy. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007; 25: 33–43.

15.

Sastre-Garriga

Alonso

Renom

. A functional magnetic resonance proof of concept pilot trial of cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2011; 17: 457–467.

16.

Jonsson

Korfitzen

Heltberg

. Effects of neuropsychological treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1993; 88: 394–400.

17.

Tesar

Bandion

Baumhackl

Efficacy of a neuropsychological training programme for patients with multiple sclerosis – a randomised controlled trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2005; 117: 747–754.

18.

Barker-Collo

Feigin

Lawes

. Reducing attention deficits after stroke using attention process training. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2009; 40: 3293–3298.

19.

Couillet

Soury

Lebornec

. Rehabilitation of divided attention after severe traumatic brain injury: A randomised trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2010; 20: 321–339.

20.

Cicerone

Langenbahn

Braden

. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 519–530.

21.

Higgins

JPT

Green

(eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011, www.cochrane-handbook.org Updated 20 March 2011, accessed October 2012.

22.

van Tulder

Furlan

Bombardier

. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 2003; 28: 1290–1299.

23.

Poser

Paty

Scheinberg

. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983; 13: 227–231.

24.

Kurtzke

Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurol 1983; 33: 1444–1452.

25.

Benedict

Munschauer

Linn

. Screening for multiple sclerosis cognitive impairment using a self-administered 15-item questionnaire. Mult Scler 2003; 9: 95–101.

26.

Smith

The symbol-digit modalities test: A neuropsychologic test of learning and other cerebral disorders. In: Helmuth

(ed.) Learning disorders. Seattle: Special Child Publications, 1968, pp.83–91.

27.

Rao

(ed.) A Manual for the brief repeatable battery of neuropsychological tests in multiple sclerosis. New York, NY: National Multiple Sclerosis Society, 1990.

28.

Sullivan

JJL

Edgley

Dehoux

A survey of multiple sclerosis: Part I: Perceived cognitive problems and compensatory strategy use. Can J Rehabil 1990; 4: 99–105.

29.

Kiresuk

Sherman

Goal attainment scaling: A general method of evaluating comprehensive mental health programmes. Community Ment Health J 1968; 4: 443–453.

30.

Benedict

Duquin

Jurgensen

. Repeated assessment of neuropsychological deficits in multiple sclerosis using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test and the MS Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire. Mult Scler 2008; 14: 940–946.

31.

Drake

Weinstock-Guttman

Morrow

. Psychometrics and normative data for the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite: Replacing the PASAT with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Mult Scler 2010; 16: 228–237.

32.

Fischer

LaRocca

Miller

. Recent developments in the assessment of quality of life in multiple sclerosis (MS). Mult Scler 1999; 5: 251–259.

33.

Marrie

Miller

Chelune

. Validity and reliability of the MSQLI in cognitively impaired patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2003; 9: 621–626.

34.

Lincoln

Dent

Harding

. Evaluation of cognitive assessment and cognitive intervention for people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 93–98.

35.

Wilson

Neuropsychological rehabilitation. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 2008; 4: 141–162.

36.

Turner-Stokes

Williams

Johnson

Goal attainment scaling: Does it provide added value as a person-centred measure for evaluation of outcome in neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury?

J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 528–535.

37.

Khan

Pallant

Turner-Stokes

Use of goal attainment scaling in inpatient rehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 652–659.

38.

Hurn

Kneebone

Cropley

Goal setting as an outcome measure: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 756–772.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB