Abstract
Objective:
Changing trends in multiple sclerosis (MS) epidemiology may first be apparent in the childhood population affected with first onset acquired demyelinating syndromes (ADSs). We aimed to determine the incidence, clinical, investigative and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of childhood central nervous system ADSs in the British Isles for the first time.
Methods:
We conducted a population active surveillance study. All paediatricians, and ophthalmologists (
Results:
Card return rates were 90%, with information available for 200/222 positive notifications (90%). After exclusion of cases, 125 remained (age range 1.3–15.9), with CIS in 66.4%, ADEM in 32.0% and NMO in 1.6%. The female-to-male ratio in children older than 10 years (
Conclusions:
We report the highest surveillance incidence rates of childhood ADS. Paediatric MS diagnosis at first ADS presentation has implications for clinical practice and clinical trial design.
Keywords
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disabling and costly neurodegenerative disorder. Incidence of MS appears to be increasing worldwide with a rising female-to-male sex ratio, 1,2 and with approximately 5% of adults who develop MS having first symptoms in childhood. 3,4 Some epidemiological evidence suggests early environmental exposures may influence MS risk. 5,6 Hence, any epidemiological change in MS may be evident first in a paediatric population.
Diagnosis of MS in children, as in adults, is first heralded by onset of a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), or more rarely acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). Children diagnosed with relapsing–remitting MS present with one of the central nervous system (CNS) acquired demyelinating syndromes (ADS) followed by a second event usually within 2 years. 7 Childhood CIS presentations with an abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain (i.e. more than one high T2 signal) compared with ADEM are more likely to have relapsing disease. 8-12 Recently, the new MRI McDonald 2010 MS criteria have been recommended for use in children presenting with a CIS, 13 potentially allowing for MS diagnosis at first presentation of a CIS. 14 There is no biomarker that differentiates between monophasic ADEM, monophasic CIS, or MS, hence a combination of clinical, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) positive oligoclonal bands and MRI features is suggested. 12, 15 MRI differences, in particular between ADEM and polyfocal CIS, are also not well recognized. 16 The differential diagnosis of ADS is complex and wide, especially so in childhood. 17
The International Paediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (IPMSSG) have published consensus definitions (2007) of paediatric CNS ADS and MS to facilitate uniformity in clinical practice and future epidemiological research. 4 Two previous surveillance studies in Canada (2004–2007) and Germany (1997–1999) revealed an incidence ranging from 3.7 18 to 9.0 per million children per year. 19 The incidence of childhood ADS remains largely unknown worldwide, and as the incidence of these disorders based on the epidemiology of MS in adults is likely to differ geographically, estimates are needed from multiple geographical regions.
We report a multinational multisource 20 prospective active surveillance study in the British Isles (latitudes 50–59°N) to ascertain incidence, clinical, investigative and MRI features of childhood (age <16 years) ADS using panel review to apply IPMSSG consensus definitions (including the incorporated McDonald MRI 2001 and Barkhof space diagnostic criteria). 4, 21 We also apply the newly revised 2010 McDonald space and time diagnostic criteria at first ADS presentation; 13 and the recent Verhey MRI prognostic MS criteria. 22
Methods
Study design
We carried out a prospective active surveillance study of first episode ADS in children aged between 1 and 15 years 11 months of age, in the British Isles. We used multisource ascertainment via two well-established surveillance units in order to establish incidence of new cases.
The British Paediatric Surveillance Unit (BPSU), the primary source of data
The British Paediatric Surveillance Unit (BPSU) facilitates epidemiological surveillance of childhood diseases of public health importance in the UK and Republic of Ireland. The BPSU, launched in 1986, has helped initiate over 80 studies with a card return rate consistently higher than 93%.
The British Ophthalmological Surveillance Unit (BOSU), the alternative source of data for optic neuritis cases
The British Ophthalmological Surveillance Unit (BOSU) enables ophthalmologists to participate in the nationwide surveillance of uncommon ophthalmological conditions. The BOSU card return rate is consistently higher than 75%.
Case ascertainment via active surveillance
One month before commencing the study, a protocol card and letter was sent to all clinicians informing them of the study. Monthly notification cards (mean 4095/month) were sent by the BPSU (mean 2945/month) to all registered certified consultant paediatricians and paediatric neurologists and BOSU (mean 1150/month) to all registered ophthalmologists (between September 2009 and September 2010). In the British Isles, these clinicians are likely to see all cases of childhood ADS. Clinicians returned the card to the surveillance units notifying any cases or confirming ‘nothing to report’. Upon receipt of a positive notification the surveillance units provided the investigating team with a BPSU/BOSU case number and clinician contact details. The study team contacted the clinician directly, sending a detailed data collection form and a blank CD for an anonymized MRI. As more than one clinician might notify the same patient seen in different settings, minimal identifiers (National Health Service [NHS] number, district postcode, sex and date of birth) were used for record linkage and to exclude duplicates with a high level of certainty (http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/bpsu).
Initial surveillance reports
Using the IPMSSG consensus definitions for classification of paediatric ADS, 4 we asked clinicians to report children experiencing clinical neurological events consistent with a first episode ADS and confirmed with white matter changes (except in optic neuritis) on MRI (Table 1).
Summarized inclusion definitions for CNS acquired demyelinating syndromes.
Data collection
A condition specific targeted neurological history was collected at the time of first demyelinating event. Data collected included: basic demographic data; demyelinating symptoms and signs; CSF findings, serological and microbiological results; timing of MRI being carried out and whether abnormal; and treatment given.
MRI imaging review
MRI scans were reviewed blinded to clinical features by MA and one of five neuroradiologists (KC, KF, RG, ML, NS). A standardized proforma was completed utilizing previously described nomenclature (supplementary material appendix 1). 10, 23, 24 McDonald 2001 dissemination in space criteria (as recommended by the current IPMSSG criteria), 4, 21 McDonald 2010 dissemination in space and time (if a gadolinium-enhanced scan was available) criteria and Verhey prognostic criteria were classified by MA according to the MRI variables and associated panel review. 13 Features of ADEM and CIS scans were compared. Although a single MRI protocol was not feasible as this was a national population based study collecting data from established clinical practice from all centres, all MRI brain scans were performed on 1.5 T scanners and had a minimum of a T1-weighted and a T2-weighted or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence in two different planes. Additional sequences included gadolinium-enhanced T1, diffusion weighted and spine images. MRI slice thickness varied from 3–5 mm.
Panel classification and agreement for inclusion
The co-investigators met quarterly as a panel to review reported cases (at least four members present at each meeting). The panel consisted of paediatric neurologists (
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the key components of the dataset. Estimates of national incidence with confidence intervals (Byar’s approximation of the exact Poisson) for the 13-month study was annualized using mid-2010 UK and 2010 Republic of Ireland population estimates. 25,26 Mid-2009 population estimates by ethnicity for England and Wales were used to evaluate rates of childhood ADS by ethnicity (Table 2). A sensitivity analysis was conducted on a worst-case scenario that all reported cases with missing clinical histories were actually cases of ADS to assess the potential impact on estimated incidence of ADS. We used a two source case capture–recapture analysis to estimate missed cases of optic neuritis on the assumption of independence, 27 but did not carry out capture–recapture analysis for other ADS, as referral networks mean that the assumption of independence was violated. The England 2010 index of multiple deprivation was used to derive the percentage of cases in England living in the 20% most deprived districts. 28 Parametric or non-parametric statistical tests (Kruskal–Wallis tests) were used for continuous distributions as appropriate given normality and χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests for nominal data. Agreement between reporters and the panel was measured using the Kappa statistic. Statistical analysis was performed using PASW Statistics for Windows version 17.0 (© SPSS, Inc., 2009, Chicago, IL, www.spss.com) and the openepi software (version 2.3.1, www.openepi.com). 29
Incidence of childhood CNS acquired demyelinating syndromes by country, sensitivity analysis and ethnic group in England and Wales.
Approvals
The study was approved by the BPSU and BOSU executive committees. Data handling was restricted to those with direct involvement in the project. To comply with collection of minimal identifier information regulations without patient consent as in Section 251 of the NHS Act 2006, the study has approval from the National Information Governance Board’s Ethics & Confidentiality Committee (ECC/BPSU 4-03[FT1]/2009) and the UK Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (09/H1202/92).
Results
Card return rate, expert review and record linkage outcome
Card return rate was 94% from the BPSU and 78% from the BOSU (total 47,910 from 53,235 cards returned including negative reports). There were 222 positive notifications (197 BPSU and 25 BOSU) with insufficient information for review of 22 notifications (6 Scotland, 12 England and Wales, and 4 Ireland and Northern Ireland). In the remaining 200 (90%), 41 duplicate notifications were identified. Cases where the event was outside the inclusion dates, September 2009 to September 2010 (

Study flow chart showing panel review and record linkage outcome.
Incidence of childhood CNS inflammatory demyelination in the British Isles
The minimum incidence of first onset ADS in children aged 1–15 years old in the British Isles is 9.83 per million children per year (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.18–11.71). Incidence was highest in England and Wales (Table 2). A sensitivity analysis showed no significant difference in incidence rates within countries in the British Isles.
Demographic characteristics
Median age was 10.0 years (range 1.3–15.9; mean 9.74 years, SD 4.34) and 51.2% (
Clinical, demographic, and phenotypic expert panel classification of the childhood CNS acquired demyelinating syndromes.
ADEM, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; ON, optic neuritis; TM, transverse myelitis; CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; NMO, neuromyelitis optica; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; IQR, interquartile range.
Results of panel review and clinical classification
Childhood ADS were classified as CIS in 66.4%, ADEM in 32.0% and neuromyelitis optic (NMO) in 1.6%. Of the CIS cases, optic neuritis (ON) represented 37.4%, transverse myelitis (TM) 31.3% and other CIS 31.3% (Table 3). The majority (70%) of the other CIS cases were polysymptomatic. Children with ADEM were younger than cases presenting with CIS (

Childhood acquired demyelinating syndromes by age (younger and greater than 10 years old) and sex.
Deaths
Clinicians reported three deaths in the initial hospital admission, one in a child with ADEM and two in cases which proved not to have ADS (post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and hypereosinophilic syndrome).
Capture–recapture analysis
Capture–recapture analysis for ON cases (
MRI features
More CIS cases fulfilled MRI McDonald 2010 dissemination in space criteria (42%) compared with the 2001 criteria (28%; Table 4). Of the CIS cases which had contrast-enhanced scans (
MRI criteria fulfilled.
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MS, multiple sclerosis; ON, optic neuritis; TM, transverse myelitis; CIS, clinically isolated syndrome.
ADEM cases compared with CIS cases with abnormal MRI (supplementary material appendix 2) were more likely to have more deep grey nuclei (
Investigative features
Children with ADEM more commonly had CSF lymphocytosis (
Investigative features.
ADEM, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; ON, optic neuritis; TM, transverse myelitis; CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; NMO, neuromyelitis optica; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid RANBP2, Ran Binding Protein 2 gene; IQR, interquartile range; WBC, white blood cell.
Treatment
The majority (89%) received either intravenous corticosteroids (84%) and/or oral prednisolone in the first instance. A higher proportion of children with ADEM were required intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and four children (two ADEM and two TM) received plasma exchange. Intravenous immunoglobulin was administered to 11% of the cohort (Table 3).
Discussion
The minimum incidence of first onset childhood ADS in the British Isles is 9.83 per million (95% CI 8.18–11.71) children per year aged 1–15 years. This is the highest reported incidence of childhood ADS from a prospective childhood surveillance study. To date, there have been two surveillance studies studying ADS. A Canadian surveillance study (2004–2007) estimated the incidence of childhood ADS to be 9.0 per million people aged less than 18 years old, 19 with 22% classified as ADEM and 78% as CIS. Although this study did not have MRI review and was conducted prior to the IPMSSG consensus definitions, it is unlikely that these factors would have had a major influence on classification. An earlier surveillance study from Germany (1997–1999) estimated the incidence of MS in children <16 years as 3.0 per million children, and that of ADEM as only 0.7 per year per million children aged less than 16 years old. 18 This study asked clinicians to report new cases of definite or suspected MS or ADEM cases, and did not include other ADS. Diagnosis of MS and ADS depends on clinical definitions and MRI criteria used, and hence it may be that these ascertainment estimates would change with current definitions and criteria (supplementary material appendix 3).
The mean age of onset (9.7 years) was similar to the Canadian incidence study (mean 10.5 years) and a French
9
(children <16 years, 1985-2001) first episode ADS retrospective cohort study (mean 9.9 years), but older than a Dutch
10
(children <16 years, 1990–2010) retrospective cohort study (8.5 years). A recent retrospective study from the USA (
This study is not without limitations. As with other epidemiological studies, some cases may not have been reported or have had sub-clinical presentations, and it is plausible that children in our study who met McDonald 2010 criteria for MS at first clinical presentation may have had previous symptoms not identified as ADS. This was addressed as far as was possible by using clear consensus case definitions and multiple sources of case ascertainment. A capture–recapture analysis estimated that a possible 16 ON cases were missed out of a potential 47, although this relies on assumptions of complete independence that may not hold in practice.
Our study shows that childhood CIS occurs more often than ADEM (ratio 2.1:1) and also confirms a previous report that ADEM can be a severe disease with one death and one in five requiring intensive care admission. 37 The proportion of children with ADEM in our cohort (32%) was slightly higher than French 9 (29%), Canadian (22%), and Dutch 10 cohorts (termed polyfocal ADS with encephalopathy, not ADEM).
We found that 43% of CIS patients had one or more asymptomatic brain lesion. Previous studies have shown that children with CIS with abnormal brain scans are at a higher risk of relapse than those without asymptomatic brain lesions. 11,12 Also it is of interest that a number of MRI measures significantly helped differentiate ADEM from CIS cases. For example, ADEM cases compared with CIS had more deep grey nuclei and cortical grey matter high T2 signal lesions. CIS cases had more periventricular, deep white matter, corpus callosum high T2 signal lesions and black holes.
CSF lymphocytosis and negative oligoclonal bands were associated with an ADEM diagnosis, in contrast to a previous study. 16 It is of interest that one case was reported as positive for the common mutation in the RANBP2 gene, which has been recently described in familial or recurrent acute necrotizing encephalopathy (ANE). 30 With the increasing recognition of the overlap between the MRI and clinical features of ADEM and ANE, and further reports of other genetically predetermined encephalopathies, 38 this potential novel group of genetic determinant(s) of encephalopathy in demyelination requires exploration.
A total of 26% of CIS cases who had gadolinium given scans (
The potential to diagnose MS at disease onset has implications for MRI protocols for children with suspected ADS, and individual patient treatment decisions. This may be particularly important as new MS drugs are emerging with reported better efficacy in adults than current injectables, and the simultaneous requirement for new drugs to undergo testing in children with the aim of ensuring robust evidence to support authorization by regulatory agencies. To date, eight new MS drugs have been recommended for a Paediatric Investigation Plan, 39 hence earlier diagnosis may increase the eligible clinical trial population. Prognostic and outcome data are needed to inform these decisions. A prospective 2-year follow up of this patient cohort is under way and a further multicentre cohort study with detailed outcome measurements and a biobank have been established. 40 These should yield prognostic information and aid validation of consensus definitions, and the clinical utility of the new McDonald and Verhey proposed MRI criteria for early diagnosis of MS in children.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
The funding bodies of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. MA, CC and EW had full access to all data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. We also acknowledge the BPSU, supported by the Department of Health (DH), for facilitating the data collection and the reporting clinicians, particularly those who completed the questionnaires. Any views expressed (in publications) are those of the investigator and not necessarily those of the BPSU or DH. We are very grateful to all paediatricians, paediatric neurologists and ophthalmologists who have completed monthly cards, particularly those who have notified cases and returned completed questionnaires and MRI copies to us. We wish to thank all of the secretaries and radiology departments who have assisted with administrative procedures such as posting case report forms and anonymized copies of MRI scans. We are grateful for the laboratory support from Professor Angela Vincent. We also wish to thank Sagar Sedani for help with data collection from the England 2010 index of multiple deprivation database.
Funding
This study was funded by the Multiple Sclerosis Society UK (grant number 893/08) and Action Medical Research (grant number SP4472). The study also received support from the Wellcome Trust (grant number GN79832) which funded the BCH research facility.
Conflict of interest statement
MA is funded by the MS Society and Action Medical Research charities. CC has been an investigator on research with unrestricted research funding from Eli Lilly, Wyeth and SHS. WKC has nothing to disclose. CDG has attended the Teva Global MS symposium supported by Teva. KF has nothing to disclose. RG has nothing to disclose. CH has received travel grants from Merck Serono and Bayer. PJ has nothing to disclose. RK has nothing to disclose. ML has nothing to disclose. MJL has received educational grants to organise a meeting from Novartis, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono and Bayer. KN has nothing to disclose. MGP has received a meeting support grant from Euroimmun. WPW has nothing to disclose. EW has received travel grants from UCB, Shire and Biogen Idec, educational grants to organize meetings from Merck Sereno, Novartis, Bayer and Biogen Idec, speaker’s fees from Merck Sereno and consultancy fees from Genzyme. All authors are members of the UK & Ireland Childhood CNS Inflammatory Demyelination Working Group.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
