Background: Telemedicine carries the potential of improving accessibility to health services, especially for disabled people.
Objective: To assess the health-related outcomes of short-term implementation of telemedicine (telemed) for MS patients.
Methods: A prospective study of 40 MS patients divided into a control group and a telemed group was conducted, in two stages: A. Six months’ follow-up for measurement of baseline health-related variables; B. Implementation stage, adding home telecare to the telemed group. A Health Value Compass was applied to assess the outcomes of home telecare implementation. Clinical status, cost data, patients’ self-assessment of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and satisfaction with telecare were studied.
Results: Patients in the telemed group demonstrated improved clinical outcome measured by symptoms severity. There was a decrease of at least 35% in the medical costs for 67% of the telemed group patients. Satisfaction with telecare was high and most patients would recommend this service to others.
Conclusions: The present pilot study, applying Health Value Compass-based analysis, suggests that telecare is a powerful tool for monitoring MS patients at home, carries the potential to improve health care while reducing costs, and should be considered for implementation as part of the management of chronic neurological diseases.
O’ConnorP. Key issues in the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis. An overview. Neurology2002; 59 (6 Suppl 3): S1–33.
2.
SteinmanLMartinRBernardCConlonPOksenbergJR. Multiple sclerosis: Deeper understanding of its pathogenesis reveals new targets for therapy. Annu Rev Neurosci2002; 25: 491–505.
3.
FinchTMayCMairFMortMGaskL. Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: An ethnographic study. Bmj2003; 327(7425): 1205–9.
HatzakisMHaselkornJWilliamsRTurnerANicholP. Telemedicine and the delivery of health services to veterans with multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil Res Dev2003; 40(3): 265–82.
6.
EgnerAPhillipsVLVoraRWiggersE. Depression, fatigue, and health-related quality of life among people with advanced multiple sclerosis: Results from an exploratory telerehabilitation study. NeuroRehabilitation2003; 18(2): 125–33.
7.
FinkelsteinJWoodJ. Design and implementation of home automated telemanagement system for patients with multiple sclerosis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2009; 2009: 6091–4.
8.
FinkelsteinJLapshinOCastroHChaEProvancePG. Home-based physical telerehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev2008; 45(9): 1361–73.
9.
DavalosMEFrenchMTBurdickAESimmonsSC. Economic evaluation of telemedicine: Review of the literature and research guidelines for benefit-cost analysis. Telemed J E Health2009; 15(10): 933–48.
10.
NelsonECMohrJJBataldenPBPlumeSK. Improving health care, part 1: The clinical value compass. Jt Comm J Qual Improv1996; 22(4): 243–58.
11.
McDonaldWICompstonAEdanGGoodkinDHartungHPLublinFD. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol2001; 50(1): 121–7.
12.
KurtzkeJF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (edss). Neurology1983; 33(11): 1444–52.
13.
VickreyBGHaysRDHarooniRMyersLWEllisonGW. A health-related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis. Qual Life Res1995; 4(3): 187–206.
14.
MahoneyFIBarthelDW. Functional evaluation: The barthel index. Md State Med J1965; 14: 61–5.
15.
MillerADishonS. Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Psychometric analysis of inventories. Mult Scler2005; 11(4): 450–8.
16.
BrunetDGHopmanWMSingerMAEdgarCMMacKenzieTA. Measurement of health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients. Can J Neurol Sci1996; 23(2): 99–103.
17.
PfenningsLEVan der PloegHMCohenLBramsenIPolmanCHLankhorstGJ. A health-related quality of life questionnaire for multiple sclerosis patients. Acta Neurol Scand1999; 100(3): 148–55.
18.
KruppLBLaRoccaNGMuir-NashJSteinbergAD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol1989; 46(10): 1121–3.
19.
WebsterKCellaDYostK. The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (facit) measurement system: Properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcomes2003; 1: 79.
20.
MenckeNMAlleyLGEtchasonJ. Application of hedis measures within a veterans affairs medical center. Am J Manag Care2000; 6(6): 661–8.
NortvedtMWRiiseTMyhrKMNylandHI. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Measuring the disease effects more broadly. Neurology1999; 53(5): 1098–103.
23.
KlauerTZettlUK. Compliance, adherence, and the treatment of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol2008; 255 Suppl 6: 87–92.
24.
LejbkowiczIPapernaTSteinNDishonSMillerAInternet usage by patients with multiple sclerosis: Implications to participatory medicine and personalized healthcare. Multiple Sclerosis International2010; 2010 vol. 2010, Article ID 640749, 7 pages. doi:10.1155/2010/64074910.1155/2010/640749
