Background: Cognitive impairment is frequent in multiple sclerosis (MS) and lacks effective treatment. Cognitive rehabilitation is widely applied in neurorehabilitation settings. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) may help in investigating changes in brain activity and provide a tool to assess the efficacy of rehabilitation.
Aim: To investigate the effect on brain activity as measured by fMRI of a cognitive rehabilitation programme in patients with MS and cognitive impairment.
Method: Fifteen patients with MS and cognitive impairment and five healthy subjects were recruited. Neuropsychological assessments were performed in patients with MS at study entry and after rehabilitation to assess cognitive changes. fMRI scans were performed at week −5 (baseline), week 0 (immediately before rehabilitation) and week 5 (immediately after rehabilitation). The fMRI paradigm was the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). The cognitive rehabilitation programme was composed of 15 computer-aided drill and practice sessions and five non-computer-aided cognitive stimulation group sessions (over 5 weeks). Strict guidelines ensured comparability of all rehabilitation interventions.
Results: Patients had increased brain fMRI activity after rehabilitation in several cerebellar areas when compared with healthy subjects. After rehabilitation, patients had significantly improved their performance on the backward version of the Digit Span Test (p = 0.007) and on a composite score of neuropsychological outcomes (p = 0.009).
Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate that this cognitive rehabilitation programme increases brain activity in the cerebellum of cognitively impaired patients with MS. The role of fMRI in the assessment of neurorehabilitation schemes warrants further investigation.
AmatoMPZipoliVPortaccioE. Multiple sclerosis-related cognitive changes: a review of cross-sectional and longitudinal studie?J Neurol Sci2006; 245: 41–46.
2.
RaoSMLeoGJBernardinLUnverzagtF. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and predictio?Neurology1991; 41: 685–691.
3.
RaoSMLeoGJEllingtonLNauertzTBernardinLUnverzagtF. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II. Impact on employment and social functionin?Neurology1991; 41: 692–696.
4.
DemareeHADeLucaJGaudinoEADiamondBJ. Speed of information processing as a key deficit in multiple sclerosis: implications for rehabilitatio?J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1999; 67: 661–663.
5.
LangdonDWThompsonAJ. Multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study of selected variables affecting rehabilitation outcom?Mult Scler1999; 5: 94–100.
6.
FischerJSPrioreRLJacobsLDCookfairDLRudickRAHerndonRM. Neuropsychological effects of interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosi?Ann Neurol2000; 48: 885–892.
7.
KruppLBChristodoulouCMelvillePScherlWFMacAllisterWSElkinsLE. Donepezil improved memory in multiple sclerosis in a randomized clinical tria?Neurology2004; 63: 1579–1585.
8.
CiceroneKDDahlbergCMalecJFLangenbahnDMFelicettiTKneippS. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 200?Arch Phys Med Rehabil2005; 86: 1681–1692.
9.
PennerIKKapposLRauschMOpwisKRadüEW. Therapy-induced plasticity of cognitive functions in MS patients: insights from fMR?J Physiol Paris2006; 99: 455–462.
10.
BelliveauJWKennedyDNJrMcKinstryRCBuchbinderBRWeisskoffRMCohenMS. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imagin?Science1991; 254: 716–719.
11.
RomboutsSALazeronRHScheltensPUitdehaagBMSprengerMValkJ. Visual activation patterns in patients with optic neuritis: an fMRI pilot stud?Neurology1998; 50: 1896–1899.
12.
WerringDJBullmoreETToosyATMillerDHBarkerGJMacManusDG. Recovery from optic neuritis is associated with a change in the distribution of cerebral response to visual stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging stud?J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2000; 68: 441–449.
13.
RoccaMAMezzapesaDMFaliniAGhezziAMartinelliVScottiG. Evidence for axonal pathology and adaptive cortical reorganization in patients at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosi?Neuroimage2003; 18: 847–855.
14.
MaineroCPantanoPCaramiaFPozzilliC. Brain reorganization during attention and memory tasks in multiple sclerosis: insights from functional MRI studie?J Neurol Sci2006; 245: 93–98.
15.
StaffenWMairAZaunerHUnterrainerJNiederhoferHKutzelniggA. Cognitive function and fMRI in patients with multiple sclerosis: evidence for compensatory cortical activation during an attention tas?Brain2002; 125: 1275–1282.
16.
AudoinBIbarrolaDRanjevaJPConfort-GounySMalikovaIAli-ChérifA. Compensatory cortical activation observed by fMRI during a cognitive task at the earliest stage of M?Hum Brain Mapp2003; 20: 51–58.
17.
HillaryFGChiaravallotiNDRickerJHSteffenerJBlyBMLangeG. An investigation of working memory rehearsal in multiple sclerosis using fMR?J Clin Exp Neuropsychol2003; 25: 965–978.
18.
MaineroCCaramiaFPozzilliCPisaniAPestalozzaIBorrielloG. fMRI evidence of brain reorganization during attention and memory tasks in multiple sclerosi?Neuroimage2004; 21: 858–867.
19.
WishartHASaykinAJMcDonaldBCMamourianACFlashmanLASchuschuKR. Brain activation patterns associated with working memory in relapsing–remitting M?Neurology2004; 62: 234–238.
20.
SweetLHRaoSMPrimeauMMayerARCohenRA. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of working memory among multiple sclerosis patient?J Neuroimaging2004; 14: 150–157.
21.
FornCBarros-LoscertalesAEscuderoJBellochVCamposSParcetMA. Cortical reorganization during PASAT task in MS patients with preserved working memory function?Neuroimage2006; 31: 686–691.
22.
RachbauerDKronbichlerMRopeleSEnzingerCFazekasF. Differences in cerebral activation patterns in idiopathic inflammatory demyelination using the paced visual serial addition task: an fMRI stud?J Neurol Sci2006; 244: 11–16.
23.
LaatschLKThulbornKRKriskyCMShobatDMSweeneyJA. Investigating the neurobiological basis of cognitive rehabilitation therapy with fMR?Brain Inj2004; 18: 957–974.
24.
ParryAMScottRBPalaceJSmithSMatthewsPM. Potentially adaptive functional changes in cognitive processing for patients with multiple sclerosis and their acute modulation by rivastigmin?Brain2003; 126: 2750–2760.
25.
PennerIKOpwisKKapposL. Relation between functional brain imaging, cognitive impairment and cognitive rehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosi?J Neurol2007; 254(Suppl 2): II53–II57.
26.
Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis (RIMS). Recommendations on rehabilitation services for persons with multiple sclerosis in Europe2004; Genoa (Italy): Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, 63–63.
27.
McFarlandHFBarkhofFAntelJMillerDH. The role of MRI as a surrogate outcome measure in multiple sclerosi?Mult Scler2002; 8: 40–51.
28.
PolmanCHReingoldSCEdanGFilippiMHartungHPKapposL. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”?Ann Neurol2005; 58: 840–846.
29.
KurtzkeJF. Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS?Neurology1983; 33: 1444–1452.
30.
LublinFDReingoldSC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international surve?Neurology1996; 46: 907–911.
31.
SolariARadiceDManneschiLMottiLMontanariE. The multiple sclerosis functional composite: different practice effects in the three test component?J Neurol Sci2005; 228: 71–74.
32.
AudoinBIbarrolaDAu DuongMVPelletierJConfort-GounySMalikovaI. Functional MRI study of PASAT in normal subject?MAGMA2005; 18: 96–102.
33.
RenomMGaroleraMSastre-GarrigaJGonzálezIFaixaCAugéL. Effects of cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosi?Mult Scler2006; 12(Suppl 1): S116–S117.
34.
LuriaAR. Comprensión de Estructuras Sintáctica?In Fundamentos de Neurolingüística1980; Barcelona: Toray-Masson,
35.
SchmahmannJDShermanJC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrom?Brain1998; 121: 561–579.
36.
RapoportMvan ReekumRMaybergH. The role of cerebellum in cognition and behavior: a selective revie?J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci2000; 12: 193–198.
37.
RivaDGiorgiC. The cerebellum contributes to higher functions during development: evidence from a series of children surgically treated for posterior fossa tumour?Brain2000; 123: 1051–1061.
38.
TavanoAGrassoRGagliardiCTriulziFBresolinNFabbroF. Disorders of cognitive and affective development in cerebellar malformation?Brain2007; 130: 2646–2660.
39.
GottwaldBWildeBMihajlovicZMehdornHM. Evidence for distinct cognitive deficits after focal cerebellar lesion?J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2004; 75: 1524–1531.
40.
KonczakJTimmannD. The effect of damage to the cerebellum on sensorimotor and cognitive function in children and adolescent?Neurosci Biobehav Rev2007; 31: 1101–1113.
41.
AllenGBuxtonRBWongECCourchesneE. Attentional activation of the cerebellum independent of motor involvemen?Science1997; 275: 1940–1943.
42.
DesmondJEFiezJA. Neuroimaging studies of the cerebellum: language, learning and memor?Trends Cogn Sci1998; 2: 355–362.
43.
PennerIKRauschMKapposLOpwisKRadüEW. Analysis of impairment related functional architecture in MS patients during performance of attentional task?J Neurol2003; 250: 461–471.
44.
LiYChiaravallotiNDHillaryFGDelucaJLiuWCKalninAJ. Differential cerebellar activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging during working memory performance in persons with multiple sclerosi?Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85: 635–639.
45.
Johansen-BergHDawesHGuyCSmithSMWadeDTMatthewsPM. Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therap?Brain2002; 125: 2731–2742.
46.
StrangmanGO’Neil-PirozziTMBurkeDCristinaDGoldsteinRRauchSL. Functional neuroimaging and cognitive rehabilitation for people with traumatic brain injur?Am J Phys Med Rehabil2005; 84: 62–75.
47.
NudoRJWiseBMSiFuentesFMillikenGW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarc?Science1996; 272: 1791–1794.
48.
CardinalKSWilsonSGiesserBSDrainAESicotteNL. A longitudinal fMRI study of the paced auditory serial addition tas?Mult Scler2008; 14: 465–471.
49.
MorgenKKadomNSawakiLTessitoreAOhayonJMcFarlandH. Training-dependent plasticity in patients with multiple sclerosi?Brain2004; 127: 2506–2517.
50.
KhanFTurner-StokesLNgLKilpatrickT. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosi?Cochrane Database Syst Rev2007; 2: CD006036–CD006036.
51.
ThompsonAJ. The effectiveness of neurological rehabilitation in multiple sclerosi?J Rehab Res Dev2000; 37: 455–461.
