Real-life walking impairment in multiple sclerosis: preliminary comparison of four methods for processing accelerometry data

Abstract

This study further validates accelerometers as a measure of walking impairment in persons with multiple sclerosis. We examined total movement counts and three novel methods of processing accelerometer data (i.e. standard deviation, approximate entropy and detrended fluctuation analysis) for quantifying real-life walking impairment in this population. A total of 70 individuals with a definite diagnosis of multiple sclerosis completed a battery of patient-rated measures of walking impairment and then wore an ActiGraph accelerometer for 7 days. The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance and bivariate correlation analysis. The results indicated that total daily movement counts and standard deviation of daily movement counts differed between groups of persons with mild, moderate, and severe self-reported disability status and who were independently ambulatory or ambulatory with assistance. Those two metrics for the accelerometer data further demonstrated strong correlations with patient-rated measures of walking impairment. By comparison, there were smaller and often non-significant differences in approximate entropy and detrended fluctuation analysis metrics for the accelerometer data as a function of disability and ambulatory status, and only moderate correlations with patient-rated measures of walking impairment. The results confirm that the metric of total daily movement counts correlates with level of disability, ambulatory status, and patient reports of walking impairment in persons with multiple sclerosis. We further demonstrate that variability, indexed by the standard deviation of daily movement counts, correlates with multiple sclerosis-related disability, ambulatory status, and self-reported walking impairment. Such results provide preliminary evidence that variability in accelerometer counts is not simply noise and may provide important information about multiple sclerosis-related walking impairment.

Keywords

Mobility gait outcome measurement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Goldman MD , Marrie RA and Cohen JA Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls. Mult Scler 2008; 14: 383-390.

Hobart J. , Freeman J. and Thompson A. Kurtzke scales revisited: The application of psychometric methods to clinical intuition. Brain 2000; 123: 1027-1040.

Hoogervorst EL , Eikelenboom MJ , Uitdehaag BM and Polman CH One year changes in disability in multiple sclerosis: Neurological examination compared with patient self report. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 439-442.

Kragt JJ , van der Linden FA , Nielsen JM , Uitdehaag BM and Polman CH Clinical impact of 20% worsening on Timed 25-foot Walk and 9-hole Peg Test in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2006; 12: 594-598.

Noseworthy JH Clinical scoring methods for multiple sclerosis . Ann Neurol 1994; 36(Suppl): S80-S85.

Hobart JC , Riazi A. , Lamping DL , Fitzpatrick R. and Thompson AJ Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: The 12-item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Neurology 2003; 60: 31-36.

Motl RW and Snook EM Confirmation and extension of the validity of the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12). J Neurol Sci 2008; 268: 69-73.

Pearson OR , Busse ME , van Deursen RW and Wiles CM Quantification of walking mobility in neurological disorders. QJM 2004; 97: 463-475.

Servais SB , Webster JG and Montoye HJ Estimating human energy expenditure using an accelerometer device. J Clin Eng 1984; 9: 159-170.

10.

Dishman RK , Washburn RA and Schoeller DA Measurement of physical activity. Quest 2001 ; 53: 295-309.

11.

Corder K. , Ekelund U. , Steele RM , Wareham NJ and Brage S. Assessment of physical activity in youth. J Appl Physiol 2008; 105: 977-987.

12.

Snook EM , Motl RW and Gliottoni RC The effect of walking mobility on the measurement of physical activity using accelerometry in multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23: 248-258.

13.

Motl RW , Snook EM , Wynn DR and Vollmer T. Physical activity correlates with neurological impairment and disability in multiple sclerosis. J Nerv Ment Dis 2008; 196: 492-495.

14.

Motl RW , Schwartz C. and Vollmer T. Continued validation of the Symptom Inventory in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2009; 285: 134-136.

15.

Stergiou N. Innovative analysis of human movement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2004.

16.

Goldberger AL , Amaral LA , Hausdorff JM , Ivanov, PCh , Peng CK and Stanley HE Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with disease and aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99 Suppl 1: 2466-2472.

17.

Newell KM and Corcos DM Variability and motor control. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1993.

18.

Lipsitz LA and Goldberger AL Loss of ‘complexity’ and aging. Potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence. JAMA 1992; 267: 1806-1809.

19.

Lipsitz LA Dynamics of stability: The physiologic basis of functional health and frailty . J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002; 57: B115-125.

20.

Sosnoff JJ , Valantine AD and Newell KM Independence between the amount and structure of variability at low force levels. Neurosci Lett 2006; 392: 165-169.

21.

Ho KK , Moody GB , Peng CK , et al. Predicting survival in heart failure case and control subjects by use of fully automated methods for deriving nonlinear and conventional indices of heart rate dynamics. Circulation 1997; 96: 842-848.

22.

Vaillancourt DE and Newell KM Changing complexity in human behavior and physiology through aging and disease. Neurobiol Aging 2002; 23: 1-11.

23.

Mayr WT , Pittock SJ , McClelland RL , Jorgensen NW , Noseworthy JH and Rodriguez M. Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Olmstead County, Minnesota, 1985-2000. Neurology 2003; 61: 1373-1377.

24.

Goodin DS A questionnaire to assess neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 1998; 4: 444-451.

25.

Confavreux C. , Vukusic S. and Adeline P. Early clinical predictors and progression of irreversible disability in multiple sclerosis: An amnesic process. Brain 2003; 126: 770-782.

26.

Schwartz CE , Vollmer T. and Lee H. Reliability and validity of two self-report measures of impairment and disability for MS. Neurology 1999; 52: 63-70.

27.

Marrie RA and Goldman M. Validity of performance scales for disability assessment in multiple sclerosis . Mult Scler 2007; 13: 1176-1182.

28.

McAuley E. , Konopack JF , Motl RW , Rosengren K. and Morris KS Measuring disability and function in older women: Psychometric properties of the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60: 901-909.

29.

Motl RW , McAuley E. and Suh Y. Validity, invariance, and responsiveness of a self-report measure of functional limitations and disability in multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2010; in press.

30.

Peng CK , Havlin S. , Stanley HE and Goldberger AL Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. Chaos 1995; 5: 82-87.

31.

Pincus SM Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 1991; 88: 2297-2301.

32.

Cavanaugh JT , Coleman KL , Gaines JM , Laing L. and Morey MC Using step activity monitoring to characterize ambulatory activity in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55: 120-124.

33.

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum , 1988.

34.

Mackey AH , Hewart P. , Walt SE and Stott NS The sensitivity and specificity of an activity monitor in detecting functional activities in young people with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 1396-1401.

35.

Schwid SR , Goodman AD , Apatoff BR , et al. Are quantitative functional measures more sensitive to worsening MS than are traditional measures? Neurology 2000; 55: 1901-1903.

36.

Nieuwenhuis MM , Van Tongeren H. , Sørensen PS and Ravnborg M. The Six Spot Step Test: A new measurement for walking ability in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2006; 12: 495-500.

37.

Ytternerg C. , Johansson S. , Andersson M. , Holmqvist LW and von Koch L. Variations in function and disability in multiple sclerosis: A two year prospective study. J Neurol 2008; 255: 967-973.

38.

Sosnoff JJ , Shin S. and Motl RW Multiple sclerosis and postural control: the role of spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 93-99.